Michael
Barnegat,#2Consumer Comment
Tue, November 09, 2004
With $3690.00 additional cost there is NO way the Finance Manager actually disclosed the Federal Truth in Lending Statement. On the top of the Finance Contract there is, depending on the bank, either a box or a seperate section which breaks down the Interest Rate, Finance Penalty, Amount Financed, Total of Payments, and Total Investment (total of payments plus downpayment). This must be not only printed for you, but demonstrated to you as well. If the Manager who disclosed your contract to you didn't go over this with you, you might have an out on the contract. I've been a Finance Manager for the auto industry for 13 years, and I absolutely cannot believe some of the things I've read about on this site. Really is unfortunate poeple who do my job in other stores feel the need harm their customers. Profit is acceptable, but taking advantage of someone who is placing trust in you is completely different. As an aside- Stick, if you're still an active poster here- the 'Shotgun' concept you keep referring to is taken slightly out of context, and you're not exactly correct in how you use the term. To 'Shotgun' an application means to call it in to a great many lenders in the hopes someone is 'asleep at the wheel' and approves someone for a better deal than they actually qualify for normally. The 'shotgun' isn't fired at the credit report, per se, the 'shotgun' is the application itself, insofar as it's fired at a great many different lenders, kind of like buckshot- hence the term 'Shotgunning an app'. It's a terrible way to get deals approved and with the upcoming changes to Dealertrack, won't be something which many Finance Managers will be able to continue to do. The scuttlebutt is Dealertrack will be implementing a system by which a credit analyst will not only be able to see an inquiry from another lender, but also the decision status of the application. Shotgunning, as it should be, may become a thing of the past.