Cory
San Antonio,#2Consumer Comment
Tue, February 28, 2006
1) You said you were going to recarpet your entire household. I don't think carpeteria would have bought and paid for, 100 yard of carpet if all they needed was 30 yards. It doesn't make good business sense. I think you just changed your mind, or got it cheaper someplace else. 2) Because of that, they sued you and went to court. You had your chance to tell the judge your side of the story. The judge found in favor of Carpeteria. A lien was placed on your house which you ignored for 13 years, until it was time to redo your flooring, again. 3) You got Carpeteria's installers to do a job, "on the side", "off the books", cutting them out of the loop. Which is unethical, but saves you a few dollars. You don't say where the "rose pink cut pile" came from. Did you get that from the same installers, off the books, at a cheaper price? Is that why you didn't need the extra 70 yards of carpet? You use all the right words to attack Carpeteria but, by your actions and in your own words, they sure don't apply to you. The interesting part about this post is any carpet/foor covering company is going to think twice about doing any business with you. If they do, they'll make you pay upfront, in cash and add 50% to adjust for all the extra BS.
Cory
San Antonio,#3Consumer Comment
Tue, February 28, 2006
1) You said you were going to recarpet your entire household. I don't think carpeteria would have bought and paid for, 100 yard of carpet if all they needed was 30 yards. It doesn't make good business sense. I think you just changed your mind, or got it cheaper someplace else. 2) Because of that, they sued you and went to court. You had your chance to tell the judge your side of the story. The judge found in favor of Carpeteria. A lien was placed on your house which you ignored for 13 years, until it was time to redo your flooring, again. 3) You got Carpeteria's installers to do a job, "on the side", "off the books", cutting them out of the loop. Which is unethical, but saves you a few dollars. You don't say where the "rose pink cut pile" came from. Did you get that from the same installers, off the books, at a cheaper price? Is that why you didn't need the extra 70 yards of carpet? You use all the right words to attack Carpeteria but, by your actions and in your own words, they sure don't apply to you. The interesting part about this post is any carpet/foor covering company is going to think twice about doing any business with you. If they do, they'll make you pay upfront, in cash and add 50% to adjust for all the extra BS.
Cory
San Antonio,#4Consumer Comment
Tue, February 28, 2006
1) You said you were going to recarpet your entire household. I don't think carpeteria would have bought and paid for, 100 yard of carpet if all they needed was 30 yards. It doesn't make good business sense. I think you just changed your mind, or got it cheaper someplace else. 2) Because of that, they sued you and went to court. You had your chance to tell the judge your side of the story. The judge found in favor of Carpeteria. A lien was placed on your house which you ignored for 13 years, until it was time to redo your flooring, again. 3) You got Carpeteria's installers to do a job, "on the side", "off the books", cutting them out of the loop. Which is unethical, but saves you a few dollars. You don't say where the "rose pink cut pile" came from. Did you get that from the same installers, off the books, at a cheaper price? Is that why you didn't need the extra 70 yards of carpet? You use all the right words to attack Carpeteria but, by your actions and in your own words, they sure don't apply to you. The interesting part about this post is any carpet/foor covering company is going to think twice about doing any business with you. If they do, they'll make you pay upfront, in cash and add 50% to adjust for all the extra BS.
Cory
San Antonio,#5Consumer Comment
Tue, February 28, 2006
1) You said you were going to recarpet your entire household. I don't think carpeteria would have bought and paid for, 100 yard of carpet if all they needed was 30 yards. It doesn't make good business sense. I think you just changed your mind, or got it cheaper someplace else. 2) Because of that, they sued you and went to court. You had your chance to tell the judge your side of the story. The judge found in favor of Carpeteria. A lien was placed on your house which you ignored for 13 years, until it was time to redo your flooring, again. 3) You got Carpeteria's installers to do a job, "on the side", "off the books", cutting them out of the loop. Which is unethical, but saves you a few dollars. You don't say where the "rose pink cut pile" came from. Did you get that from the same installers, off the books, at a cheaper price? Is that why you didn't need the extra 70 yards of carpet? You use all the right words to attack Carpeteria but, by your actions and in your own words, they sure don't apply to you. The interesting part about this post is any carpet/foor covering company is going to think twice about doing any business with you. If they do, they'll make you pay upfront, in cash and add 50% to adjust for all the extra BS.
Trish
Pebble Beach,#6Author of original report
Sun, February 26, 2006
After my report was made to the Rip-off Report, when I refinanced, it was not necessary to pay-off the bogus lien. It appears that Carpeteria realized that they made a mistake, and I was not going to let them keep the carpet and lien me for it too.
Trish
Pebble Beach,#7Author of original report
Sun, February 26, 2006
After my report was made to the Rip-off Report, when I refinanced, it was not necessary to pay-off the bogus lien. It appears that Carpeteria realized that they made a mistake, and I was not going to let them keep the carpet and lien me for it too.
Trish
Pebble Beach,#8Author of original report
Sun, February 26, 2006
After my report was made to the Rip-off Report, when I refinanced, it was not necessary to pay-off the bogus lien. It appears that Carpeteria realized that they made a mistake, and I was not going to let them keep the carpet and lien me for it too.
Trish
Pebble Beach,#9Author of original report
Sun, February 26, 2006
After my report was made to the Rip-off Report, when I refinanced, it was not necessary to pay-off the bogus lien. It appears that Carpeteria realized that they made a mistake, and I was not going to let them keep the carpet and lien me for it too.