Complaint Review: ceramic performance Inc. - Internet Texas

Hello,
As of june 2010 Federal court has awarded Motor Works LLC back the ownership of Cermax Trademark, as well as the web site www.cermatechnology.com Putting to an end the confusion of who and what is correct as it pertains to Cermax products.

Consumer notice: George akerson, Nick, are no longer offering cermax branded products
or in control of Cermax branded products as per federal court order that found them not to be the legal owners of the trademark of Cermax oil additives. The court found Motor Works llc to be the original manufacturer of cermax, and founder of all cermax branded products.

To find the original products that have been represented in 5 years of official testing, and 10 years of real sales and represented in Testimonials from clients. please visit the inventors of Cermax products at www.cermastore.com with the knowledge that you will be getting the real formulation as represented in test data.

it took 3 years and a lot of money for Motor Works LLC and Cerma Organic Inc. to be vindicated and get back what was ours all along

I do not have any personal vendetta other than this guy is bad news, and is a Felon Claiming to be Honest, While saying everyone else is a crook. So I am doing this for one reason only! To set the record straight as George is hurting honest hard working people that due to legal matters cannot stand up for themselves here. So I will do it!
As far as anyone saying this is slanderous, lies, etc.   Well last time i checked The Truth is not considered Slander. Like I said George is out there slandering the people he is trying to rip off, yet he has not one piece of paper or real documentation to back up his lies, Where as I will post everything I can find on this guy (documentation) not lies or he said-she said Trash, as George seems to be good at.

Here is a link to search George Ackersons  Federal release date from prison, where he was serving time for Counterfeiting. I will publish the news paper reports of his arrest and trial regarding this, shortly. www.bop.gov  search George Ackerson  omit the middle name in the search, it will show when the results appear  

Also as soon as the information concerning Georges dishonorable discharge from the Army comes in. I will also Post that.

Again Facts are Facts. Truth is Truth. and nothing you have to say in rebuttal without documentation to back up your claims is worth reading, and in fact supports my claim that George Ackerson is nothing more than a lier, saying defamatory things about people without any documentation to support his libelous assertions.  Typical con man tactics same as always with George Ackerson and any fool he is able to pull into his lies.

Hey George, Your time is short. Soon everyone will have the documents supporting each and every claim here, plus more! What will you do then George?  I think once Dr. Mary is in receipt of all the documents (sent out to her 3 days ago) of who you really are, She will drop you like a bad habit, George what will you do when your money pit is gone? What will you do? O-did I say DOCUMENTS can you say that word George? Documents. Irrefutable documentation, What will your words be worth then? NOTHING!

To the writer from Irvine, Sir you are sadly incorrect on your reporting here
George S. Ackerson DBA Safer Medical, Cermax, Cerbond  is not sueing anyone! He is being sued by Cerma Organic/Motor works  for taking their trade name, and in fact Goerge just lost his motion for summery judgment in this case.
Here is a copy of the ruling (exerpts)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
Motor Works, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
Safer Technologies, Inc., et al.,
Defendants.

In this case, there was no written agreement between Plaintiff manufacturer and Defendant Cerma (Defendant Safers predecessor). Thus, under Sengoku, Plaintiff is entitled to a presumption of ownership of the CERMAX mark. However, in applying the Sengoku factors to rebut the presumption, the Court finds triable issues of fact. For example, although the evidence shows that Plaintiff mentioned the term CERMAX in its October 31, 2006 email to Defendant Cerma, the first production labels with the CERMAX mark show only Defendant Cermas name on the label. (See
Case5:08-cv-03608-JW Document45 Filed11/13/09 Page7 of 11 United States District Court For the Northern District of California
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 8
Murray Decl., Exs. 1, 2.) On the other hand, the evidence shows that Plaintiff retained exclusive control over all advertising materials bearing the CERMAX mark. (Murray Decl., 4, Ex. 3.) There is no evidence for the Court to examine regarding the fourth factor. Thus, the Court finds a triable issue of fact as to the ownership of the CERMAX mark.

Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendants Motion as to this ground.
2. Likelihood of Confusion
Defendants move for summary judgment on the ground that Plaintiff cannot show a
likelihood of confusion. (Motion at 9-11.)
The test for likelihood of confusion is whether a reasonably prudent consumer in the
marketplace is likely to be confused as to the origin of the good or service bearing one of the
marks. Dreamwerks Prod. Group, Inc. v. SKG Studio, 142 F.3d 1127, 1129 (9th Cir. 1998). The
following factors are relevant to determining likelihood of confusion: (1) strength of the mark; (2)
proximity of the goods; (3) similarity of the marks; (4) evidence of actual confusion; (5) marketing
channels used; (6) type of goods and the degree of care likely to be exercised by the purchaser; (7)
defendants intent in selecting the mark; and (8) likelihood of expansion of the product lines. AMF
Inc. v. Sleekcraft Boats, 599 F.2d 341, 348-49 (9th Cir. 1979) overruled on other grounds by Mattel,
Inc. v. Walking Mountain Productions, 353 F.3d 792 (9th Cir. 2003). The most important factors
are the similarity of the marks, the relatedness of the services, and the use of a common marketing
channel. Res. Lenders, Inc. v. Source Solutions, Inc., 404 F. Supp. 2d 1232, 1240 (E.D. Cal. 2005).
Here, Plaintiffs mark appears on its website as follows:
(Streit Decl., Ex. E.)
Case5:08-cv-03608-JW Document45 Filed11/13/09 Page8 of 11
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5 Since the parties have not submitted a picture of Defendant Safers mark as used on its
products currently, the Court uses the mark as it appeared on the first production labels. (See Streit
Decl. 3.)
9
Defendant Safers mark appears on the first production labels5 as follows:
(Streit Decl., Ex. B.)
The Court finds a triable issue of fact as to likelihood of confusion. First, based on the visual
appearance of the marks, a reasonable jury could find that the marks are highly similar in
appearance. Second, the parties compete directly in sales of the same productsceramic lubrication
oil additives, and thus, a finding could be made that a reasonably prudent consumer in the
marketplace is likely to be confused as to the origin of the good or service bearing one of the marks.
Finally, neither party has produced evidence of likelihood of confusion through market tests or
expert reports.
Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendants Motion as to this ground. In sum, the Court
DENIES Defendants Motion as to the First Cause of Action.__________________________________________________________

As for georges dishonorable discharge from the army, the freedom of information act is how to get his information. Not an internet search! George sylvester Ackerson, Was dishonorably discharged from the army. Not to mention he is a convicted Felon who has served time in federal prison for Counterfiting 100.00 Bills I will post the news paper reports of this shortlly.


So please Get your fact right before stading up for George, as it just exposes your ignorance about this situation.

This report is titled as an "Update" yet the most recent date of activity is stated to be 2003.  It sounds more like the author has a personal vendetta.  Please update with an update.

On Cermax, I found that Ackerson has a suit in the Federal Court of CA against this group.  I couldn't access the PACER files, but it appears that the reporter here is simply using this venue to slander his/her opponent.

The military discharge is re someone of the same name but in 1890.  So, unless this Ackerson is over 100 years old, I think that the reporter is simply creating an air of discredit.

Please use this site for real issues and not as a way to promote your own war.

The company Cerma technology,Ceramic performance worldwide Inc. selling the product called Cermax  and "Cerbond"  . Also Safer medical inc, as both companies are owned by "George S. Ackerson" and resellers of the products are Ceramic Performance Inc.  product called Cerbond ,This person is known for impersonating other companies products by taking their company trade names or product data, trademarks  then pushing the original companies to the breaking point with lies and treats to their clients, or turning them into some government agency in an effort to take over there market. as he has done to the company Cerma Organic in Texas, The original makers and rightful owners of the products that george is claiming as his. Just read Below... as this is not George S. Ackersons First rodeo ! And if you perform a search ie Google his name you will find things about this guy and his companies. Follow this link to the federal corrections web site to see Georges  release date from the prison (reportadlly for Counterfitting?)(http://www.bop.gov/iloc2/InmateFinderServlet?Transaction=NameSearch&needingMoreList=false&FirstName=george&Middle=&LastName=ackerson&Race=U&Sex=U&Age=&x=66&y=16) Truth is truth . Here is  quote from the last companies owner that George Ackerson has had dealings with. {Critical to the destruction of AO Labs in the United States was the coordinated involvement of my former associate, Kevin Trudeau -- of late-night informercial fame -- and George Ackerson, a former associate who bragged to associates about his role after my imprisonment. (Additionally, the DOJ prosecutor in my case, Larry Regan, identified George Ackerson to me in language so descriptive that his identity was unmistakable.) After my imprisonment in September, 2003, Ackerson went about the business of setting up imitation Alpha Omega Labs companies with two of our former distributors -- first, in the form of working with Toby McAdams to copy all of our materials; and then working with Jennifer Wilson of Drake, Australia, to copy our company name and all our materials. To this day, Jennifer Wilson produces Cansema with the same name, same material -- even the type style of Cansema (i.e. Cooper Black) is identical. To help identify the source of the counterfeit materials she is producing with George Ackerson's aid." George S. Ackerson -- FDA informant who has worked with and supplied stolen material from AO to give to other entities -- including Jennifer Wilson and Toby McAdams. His primary residence is in Fort Benton, Montana." This guy is a great con man Although never has Anything to backup his lies , Now that the truth about this guy is coming to light, I hope his days of taking the work of others is over! Be forewarned! he is not who he says he is! Here is the writing of a 11 year friend of George Ackerson the owner of all the above companies.. The Hidden Dangers of Angering Pedophiles Who Work for the Federal Government In early October, 2007, Cathryn flew back to Lake Charles to take care of a handful of remnant issues. In the course of her three day stay, she visited our attorney, Mike Wright, who had startling revelations of a most unusual nature -- much of it confirming what we had already heard from these other emerging sources. Before our family permanently moved to Ecuador in the summer of 2007, we had Mike file the necessary paperwork to complete our civil lawsuit that we had filed against George Ackerson and J. Michael Overton in 2003. We were simply attempting to bring closure to something that Federal agents had aborted in September, 2003, with my arrest. Mike revealed to Cathryn that George Ackerson had called HIM and said that he was working with the U.S. Attorney General on my case. The threat was clear and unmistakeable: "If you proceed with your case against me, I'll use the Federal Agents that are in my back pocket to put your client back in prison." George Ackerson's anger was understandable and requires some background explanation. For many years following the Carl Hubert fiasco, I remained out of contact with George. Some time in 1999, George contacted me again just to chat. Cathryn and I eventually visited him at his apartment in San Antonio -- coincidentally, the same city I had first met George back in January, 1987. George even stayed over our home on December 31, 1999 with is ex-wife, Dotty, to see if anything would materialize with Y2K. At that time, George was working for company called Ozel Pharmaceutical. They had patented a drug called Amversel, raised millions of dollars to get approved by the FDA. (Like most small drug companies who don't know how the game is played, they ran out of money before they could get approval -- a quite predictable outcome if you know how the FDA works). In late 2000, Cathryn and I got an unexpected phone call from George. He'd been fired. I had never forgotten that George had acted as a money broker for Lumen Foods in its early days. Despite the fact that he was well paid in commissions for his work, I had always felt a certain indebtedness. It is in that spirit that we asked George -- who now was in a financial bind -- if he wanted to move into our home. It goes without saying that you uncover entirely different attributes in a person when they live with you -- versus communicating with them from a distance. I had known, for instance, that George had an issue with children. He had been dishonorably discharged from the U.S. Army after the Vietnam War for improper activities involving his "volunteer work at an orphanage." When I asked George about this, he said he'd been falsely accused of stealing a stereo and some periphenalia. The response seemed bizarre, but I failed to press further. I should have. On November 18, 2001 -- (and I only know this because I made a notation in my U.S. passport) -- while in Nassau, Bahamas, attending to Alpha Omega Labs' business, I got a frantic call from Cathryn. Apparently, she had invited George and a few friends to have lunch at one of the local casino restaurants in Westlake (across the bridge from Lake Charles). The casino (Isle of Capri) has an expansive buffet downstairs, which we used to visit quite regularly. At the time, our son, Myron, was just five years old. He and a friend were playing with the soft, red, velvet ropes between the metal polls which are used to guide the waiting line that leads to the cash register -- where you pay before you eat. In other words, he was being a little kid. He was a little kid. Unexpectedly -- and out of no where -- George "cold cocked" our son. He didn't slap him. He didn't reprimand him. He didn't push him. He punched him in the head with a closed fist. There were over a half dozen witnesses to the act. Myron immediately started screaming in pain and ran to Cathryn for protection. Amazingly, this party of "friends" and kids went and ahead and attempted to have a meal anyway. To this day, I think my wife was in too much shock to know what to do in that situation. Upon returning home, Cathryn immediately called me and asked me to come home immediately. My return air ticket was scheduled for the following day -- so I convinced her to let me come home and we made plans on how she should protect the household and our son until I got home. Once I got home, I got an expanded version of what happened. I also learned that George had been asking if Myron could take a shower with him . . . naked. I had heard enough at that point, and I put an end to our relationship in short order. I told him the relationship was over -- had a friend come over with a loaded revolver (inside a newspaper) -- had him collect his belongings -- and sent him packing back to his father's ranch in Fort Benton, Montana. Upon getting rid of George, we went through the computer terminal he used at Lumen Foods to see if he had been doing anything that could get us in trouble. We found nothing illegal financially . . . only a load of gay pornography, some involving children, too numerous to count. Not knowing if this would ever get us in trouble now that it was sitting on one of our computers, we promptly erased all the offending material. We notified our attorney, Mr. Richard Moreno of Lake Charles, of what had happened. On his advice, we called the Lake Charles Police Department, which has a division that deals with child rape. Myron was interviewed by their specialists and we were told that it was unlikely that George had had any sex with Myron . . . yet.} Just thought you may want to know!