Does anyone else have information on Global Rylaties or this BCI or its owner? I lost a lot of money with these clowns. For the longest time there was no website or information on Global. I got a call from Dominic character and he told me they had a cyber attack!
Now they have a website again and a new facebook page. There was nothing on them for over 15 months. There is no address listed for them .
I have been doing a little digging and it looks like they now call themself BCI Ltd or Benchmark Conversion Ltd. They are in Missisaugi Ontario Canada. On Kittimat Road? Anyone have information on this?
I have been trying to sell my Emeralds for a long time and have not been helped at all. In the past I have dealt with a Dale and then David Becker?. Then David brooks who sold me the stones! Then William for two years. He just pushed me away. Another guy I cant remember called Craig or greg? Then a Dominic! No one has helped and I am positive I have been scammed by this company.
I am reching out to the police or DA here in Illionois and have a meeting for the first week of Decmber to discuss what I can do with lawyer.
Is there anyone who can recommend what police people in Canada to work with?
Does anyone have any information on this Brandon Hall ? Where he lives? Other business he may own?
It says on his website that his daugther Karen works there. Anyone dealt with her? Is this another lie?
If it is even his real name ? I was told this company was over 40 years old. I think that is bullshit. If anyone in America or Canada have information on this Brandon Hall please post it. If anyone is working with law enforcement please share as well and we can put this guy where he belongs.
I will check other message boards for information and will be sharing everything I find out on Global, BCi and this Hall guy
Akward
Mississauga,#2General Comment
Thu, October 12, 2017
Global Royalties has an on going lawsuit right now because David Brook was working for another company secretly on the side and was essentially undercutting all of Global Royalties customers and stole their list of customers to obviously benefit from in another company. Apparently this company operates out of Hamilton, Ontario. My mother's name is Diane McCrae and she is an employee for Global Royalties or Benchmark Conversions, same s*** storm different name. She has been working for Brandon or Branden Hall for 16 years and she now might not be getting a much deserved severance pay out or retirement payout, I dont know what to call it, because of all the secrets behind the industry she is employed by. Controversial subjectivity precious gems and stones are I would assume. Aside from slavery in mines and potential foreign laws with corruption and the potential for blackmailing being a possibility, I would say my mom has me as her son which does nothing but bring the worlds controversial subjects to the forefront of social media, like Facebook... But I can't bring this subject to the forefront because my mom asked me not too and its hard enough living with me already. So I think that David Brook the guy who now associated with the people whom f**ked over my mother's employer should be either paying out my mother's employer to even things up to alleviate all the stress that Brandon or Branden Hall is taking on that my mom absorbs instinctively like a babysitter and brings home to me so that I dont have to nurse my mother when she gets old and I have to be a nanny. My mom works hard and deserves a fair payout when she retires because it is not her fault or the owner's that his employee stole his customers and left their company in lawsuit s*** storm that eventually they will not be able to afford because lawyers do not work for free and corruption and controversial subjects might make destroy a lawyers reputation. Money works with corruption and away from controversial subjects. Deny that and your a b****! Thank you for listening, I hope you help my mom.
Curious1
Las Vegas,#3General Comment
Tue, November 22, 2016
ONTARIO
Court File No.: r /VV"'"" L
Cv-\.5 - \ \CX) 0 -c_j_J.-
( Commercial List )
GLOBAL ROYALTIES LIMITED AND BENCHMARK CONVERSION INTERNATIONAL LIMITED 0/A BCI
Plaintiffs
- and -
DAVID BROOK , ANNA BROOK , 2323593 ONTARIO INC., GEOFFREY BLACK aka GEOFF BLACK , GRIFFIN & IDGHBURY INC., DARIO BERIC aka DARIO BERIC - MASKAREL , DIKRAN KHATCHERIAN aka DIKO KHATCHERIAN aka DANNY MATAR , LESLIE FROHLINGER aka LES FROHLINGER , DIVERSITY WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC. and DIVERSITY WEALTH MANAGEMENT HOLDINGS INC.
Defendants
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
TO THE DEFENDANTS
A LEGAL PROCEEDING HAS BEEN COMMENCED AGAINST YOU by the
plaintiff. The claim made against you is set out on the following pages.
IF YOU WISH TO DEFEND TIDS PROCEEDING, you or an Ontario lawyer acting for you must prepare a statement of defence in Form 18A prescribed by the Rules of Civil Procedure, serve it on the plaintiff s lawyer or, where the plaintiff does not have a lawyer, serve it on the plaintiff, and file it, with proof of service, in this court office, WITHIN TWENTY DAYS after this statement of claim is served on you, ifyou are served in Ontario.
If you are served in another province or territory of Canada or in the United States of America, the period for serving and filing your statement of defence is forty days. If you are served outside Canada and the United States of America, the period is sixty days.
Instead of serving and filing a statement of defence, you may serve and file a notice of intend to defend in the Form 18B prescribed by the Rules of Civil Procedure. This will entitle you to ten more days within which to serve and file your statement of defence.
IF YOU FAIL TO DEFEND TIDS PROCEEDING, JUDGMENT MAY BE GIVEN AGAINST YOU IN YOUR ABSENCE AND WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO YOU. IF YOU WISH TO DEFEND THIS PROCEEDING BUT ARE UNABLE TO PAY LEGAL FEES, LEGAL AID MAY BE AVAILABLE TO YOU BY CONTACTING A LOCAL LEGAL AID OFFICE.
|
IF YOU PAY THE PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM, and $1,500.00 for costs, within the time for serving and filing your statement of defence, you may move to have this proceeding dismissed by the court. Ifyou believe the amount claimed for costs is excessive, you may pay the plaintiff's claim and $400.00 for costs and have the costs assessed by the court.
Date: Jun:fo s Issued by ....· ·......... 0.0.......
Lo al Registrar
TO:
AND TO:
AND TO:
AND TO:
AND TO:
'
Geoffrey Black c/o Griffin & Highbury Inc.
1100 Central Parkway West, Suite 37 Mississauga, Ontario
L5C 4E5
Dario Berle c/o
Griffin & Highbury Inc.
1100 Central Parkway West, Suite 37 Mississauga, Ontario
L5C 4E5
Griffin & Highbury Inc.
1100 Central Parkway West, Suite 37
Mississauga, Ontario
L5C 4E5
Anna Brook
3880 Duke of York Blvd., Suite 2909
Mississauga, Ontario
L5B 4M7
David Brook
3880 Duke of York Blvd., Suite 2909
Mississauga, Ontario
L5B 4M7
AND TO:
AND TO:
AND TO:
AND TO:
AND TO:
2323593 Ontario Inc. c/o Anna Brook
3880 Duke of York Blvd., Suite 2909 Mississauga, Ontario
L5B 4M7
Dikran Khatcherian c/o
Diversity Wealth Management Inc. 3550 Victoria Park Avenue, Suite 309 Toronto, Ontario
M2H 2N5
Diversity Wealth Management Inc. 3550 Victoria Park Avenue, Suite 309 Toronto, Ontario
M2H 2N5
Leslie Frohlinger c/o
Diversity Wealth Management Holdings Inc.
66 Nuggett Court Brampton, Ontario L6T 5A9
Diversity Wealth Management Holdings Inc. 66 Nuggett Court
Brampton, Ontario L6T 5A9
CLAIM
(a) a declaration that at all material times David Brook ("Brook") was a fiduciary of and owed fiduciary duties to Global and BCI, including the duties of honesty, loyalty, avoidance of conflicts of interest, utmost good faith and to at all material times act in the best interests of Global and BCI;
(b) a declaration that Brook breached his fiduciary duties by, inter alia, establishing Griffin & Highbury Inc. ("Griffin") a competing business, while in the employ of or under retainer by Global and BCI and stealing proprietary information and diverting sales, clients, revenues and business opportunities for the benefit of himself, Griffin and all other defendants;
(c) a declaration that Brook defrauded Global and BCI and or misappropriated sales, clients, revenue and business opportunities belonging to Global and or BCI while acting in a fiduciary capacity;
(d) a declaration that the defendants knowingly assisted and or participated with Brook in his dishonest and fraudulent breach of fiduciary duty;
(e) a declaration that the defendants were unjustly enriched by reason of Brook's breach of his fiduciary and or contractual duties to Global and BCI;
(f) a declaration that any funds directly or indirectly obtained or derived from Brook's breaches of his fiduciaries duties and or contractual duties are impressed with a constructive trust for the benefit of Global and or BCI;
(g) an order requiring the defendants to disgorge any and all funds, directly or indirectly obtained from Brook's breaches of his fiduciary and or contractual duties;
(h) an accounting of any and all funds directly or indirectly obtained or derived from Brook's breaches of his fiduciaries duties;
(i) an order allowing the plaintiffs to trace and recover any and all of the funds directly or indirectly obtained or derived from Brook's breaches of his fiduciaries duties and or contractual duties;
G) if necessary and to the extent it is necessary an order, granted nunc pro tune, authorizing the commencement and continuance of this action as against Brook, an undischarged bankrupt who was deemed to be assigned into bankruptcy on or about February 27, 2015;
(k) in addition and or in the alternative and as against Brook, damages in the amount of
$1,000,000.00 , or such other amounts as may be proven at trial, for breach of fiduciary duty and or breach of contract;
(1) as against all defendants such orders including equitable orders as are necessary to restore Global and or BCI to the position they would have been in or would be in but for the breaches of fiduciary and or contractual and or common law duties of the defendants; including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, a permanent and interlocutory injunction:
(i) restraining the defendants, their agents and representatives, from directly or indirectly soliciting orders from any present clients or customers of Global and or BCI or endeavoring to solicit, or gain the custom of, canvass or interfere with any person or entity who is a current client or customer including a prospective customer of Global and or BCI;
(ii) restraining the defendants, their agents and representatives, from directly or indirectly communicating or dealing with any person or entity who is a current client or customer of Global and or BCI for the purposes of selling, servicing, marketing or promoting any products or services that are the same as or similar to the products and services currently offered by Global and or BCI;
(iii) restraining the defendants, their agents and representatives, from directly or indirectly communicating or dealing with any person or entity who is a current supplier of services, products, or materials that Global and or BCI needs or uses in its business for the purpose of attempting to persuade or entice such supplier to supply such services, products or materials to any business operating or planning to operate in competition with or similar to the current business of Global and or BCI;
(iv) restraining the defendants, their agents and representatives, from directly or indirectly interfering with Global and or BCI's business relationships generally, and with its employees which, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, shall include any attempt to induce such employees to leave their employment with Global and or BCI;
(v) restraining the defendants, their agents and representatives, from directly or indirectly making use of any confidential or proprietary information of Global and or BCI; and
(vi) requiring the defendants, their agents and representatives to immediately return to Global and or BCI any and all property including intellectual property of Global and or BCI.
(m) as against all defendants other than Brook, damages in the amount of $1,000,000.00, or such other amounts as may be proven at trial, for knowingly assisting Brook in breaching his fiduciary duties;
(n) as against all of the defendants, jointly and severally, special damages in an amount to be specified on or before trial and as may be proven at trial, for unlawful conspiracy;
(o) as against all defendants, jointly and severally, damages in the amount of $1,000,000.00 or such other amounts as may be proven at trial, for loss of business and injury to reputation;
(p) in the alternative and or in addition, as against all defendants, damages in an amount to be specified on or before trial and as may be proven at trial, for breach of contract or for inducing breach of contract;
(q) as against all defendants, jointly and severally, punitive damages in the amount of
$200,000.00 or such other amount as, in its discretion, this Honourable Court deems just;
(r) pre-judgment interest, compounded, pursuant to the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.0. 1990, and amendments thereto;
(s) post-judgment interest, compounded, pursuant to the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, and amendments thereto;
(t) costs of this action on a substantial indemnity basis plus H.S.T.; and
(u) such further and other relief as this Court may deem just.
I. OVERVIEW
(b) BCI
(c) Brook
a) stealing and using confidential information of Global or BCI;
b) supplying confidential information to any unauthorized person let alone a competitor;
c) directly and or indirectly competing with Global or BCI;
d) assisting, directly or indirectly any competitor of Global or BCI; and
e) appropriating any sales, revenue or clients of Global or BCI.
a) In section 2.3 a comprehensive full and faithful service provision;
b) In section 5.1 a comprehensive confidentiality provision;
c) In section 6.1 a six month non-competition provision;
d) In section 7.1 a comprehensive one year non-solicitation of clients, suppliers and employee provision; and
e) In section 9.1 a non-disparagement provision.
(d) Anna Brook
(e) 2323593 Ontario Inc.
(t) Geoffrey Black
$550,000.00 in salary and commissions.
a) In section 2.3 a comprehensive full and faithful service provision;
b) Insection 5.1 a comprehensive confidentiality provision;
c) Insection 6.1 a six month non-competition provision;
d) In section 7.1 a comprehensive one year non-solicitation of clients, suppliers and employee provision; and
e) Insection 9.1 a non-disparagement provision.
(g) Dario Berle
a) In section 2.3 a comprehensive full and faithful service provision;
b) In section 5.1 a comprehensive confidentiality provision;
c) In section 6.1 a six month non-competition provision;
d) In section 7.1 a comprehensive one year non-solicitation of clients, suppliers and employee provision; and
e) In section 9.1 a non-disparagement provision.
(h) Griffin & Highbury Inc.
(j) Diversity Wealth Management Inc.
(1) Diversity Wealth Management Holdings Inc.
a) In section 2.3 a comprehensive full and faithful service provision;
b) In section 5.1 a comprehensive confidentiality provision;
c) In section 6.1 a six month non-competition provision;
d) In section 7.1 a comprehensive one year non-solicitation of clients, suppliers and employee provision; and
e) In section 9.1 a non-disparagement provision.
a) Brook was wrongfully copying client files into hard copy and removing client files from the office;
b) regularly communicating with Black with respect to the confidential business of Global and BCI;
c) diverting sales, revenues and clients of Global/BC!to Griffin;
d) Black and Brook were using Global's/BCI's gemstone/diamond suppliers to affect the sales;
e) Brook and Black were organizing some of those sales as cash sales;
f) that the fraudulent misappropriation of clients, sales and revenue had been extensive and had generated no less than $200,000.00 in profits for Black and $200,000.00 in profits for Brook in the period of eight months; and
g) Brook was diverting his profits to the benefit of his wife and or his alter ego company.
a) the defendant Anna Brook had incorporated Griffin on November 22, 2013;
b) Anna Brook and Black were officers and directors of Griffin but her purported involvement in Griffin was a sham designed to cover Brook's involvement and ownership in Griffin;
c) the defendant Berle had joined Griffin after leaving Global and was selling gemstones/coloured diamonds on behalf of Griffin in contravention of his employment agreement with Global;
d) Griffin was operating at a time when the defendants Berle, Black, Brook and 2323593 Ontario Inc. were under contract with and employed by Global and they continued to operate Griffin immediately after leaving Global;
e) Brook was operating Griffin at a time when he was also under contract with BCI;
f) Brook joined Griffin immediately after his termination of employment with BCI and Global;
g) Brook was continuing to solicit customers and suppliers of BCI after the termination of his employment;
h) Brook was also supplying confidential information, including names of BCI/Global client to the defendants Khatcherian and Diversity and was arranging to be paid in cash in respect of sales regarding said clients; and
i) Brook was also supplying confidential information, including names of BCI/Global client to the defendants Frohlinger and Diversity Holdings and was arranging to be paid in cash in respect of sales regarding said clients.
OF EMPLOYMENT
(a) Brook
a) not to unfairly compete with Global/BC!;
b) not to directly or indirectly seek to obtain the custom of Global/BCI's customers;
c) not to use confidential and proprietary information of Global/BC!; and
d) not to appropriate Global/BCI's business opportunities.
a) a comprehensive duty of confidentiality prohibiting any use or disclosure of confidential information;
b) a duty not to compete with BCI for six months;
c) a comprehensive duty not to solicit any clients, suppliers and employees for a period of one year; and
d) a comprehensive non-disparagement provision.
(a) conspiring to and establishing a competing business while employed by Global and BCI;
(b) continuing to compete with Global and BCI;
(c) accepting business from clients of Global and BCI;
(d) stealing and using confidential and proprietary information of Global and BCI to establish and operate the competing business and to obtain revenue, sales and clients from Global and BCI;
(e) defrauding Global and BCI and misappropriating sales, revenues and clients for his benefit and the benefit of the other defendants;
(f) directly and or indirectly communicating with Global and BCI customers for the purposes of obtaining their custom for his competing business;
(g) soliciting and communicating with suppliers of Global and BCI for the purpose of competing with BCI;
(h) misappropriating for the benefit of himself and the defendants or some of them, the business opportunities of Global and BCI;
(i) conspiring with Black and others to avoid liability to Global/BC!or the authorities by failing to record or disclose cash sales transactions; and
G) disparaging Global and BCL
(b) Black
a) a comprehensive duty of confidentiality prohibiting any use or disclosure of confidential information;
b) a duty not to compete with Global for six months;
c) a comprehensive duty not to solicit any clients, suppliers and employees for a period of one year; and
d) a comprehensive non-disparagement provision.
(a) conspiring to and establishing a competing business while employed by Global;
(b) conspiring with Brook and others in establishing and operating a competing business while Brook was employed by Global/BC!and a fiduciary of Global/BC!;
(c) conspiring with Brook and others in stealing and using confidential and proprietary information of Global and BCI to establish and operate the competing business and to obtain revenue, sales and clients from Global and BCI;
(d) conspiring with Brook in defrauding Global and BCI and misappropriating sales, revenues and clients for his benefit and the benefit of the other defendants;
(e) establishing and operating a competing business with Brook while Brook was employed by Global/BC! and a fiduciary of Global/BC!;
(t) breaching the full and faithful service provision in his employment agreement;
(g) competing with Global while employed by Global;
(h) breaching his employment agreement by immediately competing with Global after res1grung;
(i) breaching his employment agreement by using/accepting confidential Global information;
G) breaching his employment agreement by soliciting and accepting business from clients of Global;
(k) breaching his employment agreement by soliciting and communicating with suppliers of Global for the purpose of competing with Global;
(1) misappropriating for the benefit of himself and the defendants or some of them, the business opportunities of Global and BCI;
(m) conspiring with Brook and others to avoid liability to Global/BC!or the authorities by failing to record or disclose cash sales transactions; and
(n) disparaging Global and BCI.
(c) Anna Brook
(a) establishing and operating a competing business in concert with Brook while Brook was employed by Global/BC! and a fiduciary of Global/BC!;
(b) conspiring with Brook and others in establishing and operating a competing business while Brook was employed by Global/BC!and a fiduciary of Global/BC!;
(c) conspiring with Brook and others in stealing and using confidential and proprietary information of Global and BCI to establish and operate the competing business and to obtain revenue, sales and clients from Global and BCI;
(d) conspiring with Brook in defrauding Global and BCI and misappropriating sales, revenues and clients for his benefit and the benefit of the other defendants; and
(e) conspiring with Brook and others to avoid liability to Global/BC! or the authorities by failing to record or disclose cash sales transactions.
a) a comprehensive duty of confidentiality prohibiting any use or disclosure of confidential information;
b) a duty not to compete with Global for six months;
c) a comprehensive duty not to solicit any clients, suppliers and employees for a period of one year; and
d) a comprehensive non-disparagement provision.
(a) conspiring to and establishing a competing business while employed by Global;
(b) conspiring with Brook and others in establishing and operating a competing business while Brook was employed by Global/BC! and a fiduciary of Global/BC!;
(c) conspiring with Brook and others in stealing and using confidential and proprietary information of Global and BCI to establish and operate the competing business and to obtain revenue, sales and clients from Global and BCI;
(d) conspiring with Brook in defrauding Global and BCI and misappropriating sales, revenues and clients for his benefit and the benefit of the other defendants;
(e) establishing and operating a competing business with Brook while Brook was employed by Global/BC! and a fiduciary of Global/BC!;
(f) breaching the full and faithful service provision in his employment agreement;
(g) competing with Global while employed by Global;
(h) breaching his employment agreement and immediately competing with Global after res1gmng;
(i) breaching his employment agreement and using and accepting confidential Global information;
(j) breaching his employment agreement by soliciting and accepting business from clients of Global;
(k) misappropriating for the benefit of himself and the defendants or some of them, the business opportunities of Global and BCI; and
(1) disparaging Global and BCI.
(t) Griffin
(g) Khatcherian
a) competing with GlobaVBCI;
b) using and or disclosing confidential information;
c) soliciting clients of GlobaVBCI; and
d) soliciting suppliers of Global/BC!.
(a) conspiring with Brook and others in establishing and operating a competing business while Brook was a fiduciary of Global/BC! and prohibited by contract from doing so;
(b) conspiring with Brook and others in stealing and using confidential and proprietary information of Global and BCI to establish and operate the competing business and to obtain revenue, sales and clients from Global and BCI;
(c) conspiring with Brook in defrauding Global and BCI and misappropriating sales, revenues and clients for his benefit and the benefit of himself, Brook, Diversity and the other defendants;
(d) inducing Brook into competing with Global while employed by Global;
(e) inducing Brook into breaching his employment agreement and immediately competing with Global/BC!after resigning;
(f) inducing Brook into breaching his employment agreement and using and accepting confidential GlobaVBCI information;
(g) inducing Brook into breaching his employment agreement by soliciting and accepting business from clients of Global/BCI;
(h) inducing Brook into misappropriating for the benefit of the defendants or some of them including Brook, Khatcherian and Diversity the business opportunities of Global and BCI;
(i) conspiring with Brook to avoid liability to Global/BC! or the authorities by failing to record or disclose cash sales transactions; and
G) disparaging Global and BCI.
(h) Diversity
(i) Leslie Frohlinger
a) competing with Global/BC!;
b) using and or disclosing confidential information;
c) soliciting clients of Global/BC!; and
d) soliciting suppliers of Global/BCI.
(a) conspiring with Brook and others in establishing and operating a competing business;
(b) conspiring with Brook and others in stealing and using confidential and proprietary information of Global and BCI to establish and operate the competing . business and to obtain revenue, sales and clients from Global and BCI;
(c) conspiring with Brook in defrauding Global and BCI and misappropriating sales, revenues and clients for his benefit and the benefit of himself, Brook, Diversity, Diversity Holdings and the other defendants;
(d) inducing Brook into competing with BCI;
(e) inducing Brook into breaching his employment agreement;
(f) inducing Brook into breaching his employment agreement and using and accepting confidential Global/BC! information;
(g) inducing Brook into breaching his employment agreement by soliciting and accepting business from clients of Global/BC!;
(h) inducing Brook into misappropriating for the benefit of the defendants or some of the including Brook, Khatcherian, Diversity and Diversity Holdings the business opportunities of Global and BCI;
(i) conspiring with Brook to avoid liability to Global/BC! or the authorities by failing to record or disclose cash sales transactions.
G) disparaging Global and BCI.
(j) Diversity Wealth Management Holdings Inc.
(a) they agreed to and did establish a competing business while Brook, Black and Beric were employed by Global;
(b) they agreed to and did operate a competing business while Brook, Black and Beric were employed by Global;
(c) they agreed to and did operate a competing business while Brook was employed by and was a fiduciary of both Global and BCI;
(d) they agreed to and did steal confidential proprietary documentation and information from Global/BC!;
(e) they agreed to and did use that confidential proprietary documentation and information for their own benefit;
(f) they agreed to and had Brook breach his fiduciary and contractual duties to Global/BC!;
(g) they agreed to and did solicit clients, sales and revenue from Global/BC!;
(h) they agreed to and did accept business from clients of Global/BC!;
(i) they agreed to and did defrauding Global/BC! by misappropriating sales, revenues and clients for their own benefit;
G) they agreed to and did misappropriate business opportunities belonging to Global/BC!.
(k) they agreed to and did structure cash sales to clients of Global/BC!to avoid liability to Global/BC! or the authorities by failing to record or disclose cash sales transactions; and
(k) they agreed to and did disparage Global and BCI.
The plaintiffs propose that this action be tried at Toronto, Ontario.
Date: June 22 , 2015
HARVEY STONE
Barrister & Solicitor
LSUC No.32071U
124 Downing Blvd. Thornhill, Ontario L4J 7M2
Harvey Stone
Telephone (416) 318-6544
Fax (905) 709-9202
Lawyer for the Plaintiffs
Global Royalties Limited et al V. David Brook et al
Plaintiffs Defendants
Court File No.
|
::::> - l I b--c«l-
ONTARIO
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
Proceedings Commenced at Toronto, Ontario
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
Harvey Stone Barrister & Solicitor LSUC No.32071 U
124 Downing Blvd. Thornhill, Ontario L4J 7M2
Tel :(416)318-6544
Fax : (905)709-8202
Lawyer for the Plaintiffs