Paul
Marshall,#2Author of original report
Wed, November 16, 2005
What is really sad about this experience is the loss of trust. It's something a kin to catching your wife or girlfriend in bed with a neighbor. The trust is gone and nothing can retrieve it. Maybe that's why I never heard from Holmes. I've dealt with Japanese companies in my professional life and was impressed with their emphasize on partnership and relationships. Price is important, but a fair, honest relationship is worth sometime. It has real value. I laugh as I look back remembering the many surveys and telephone calls I received from Honda and Holmes after having my two Hondas serviced. (Of course, they didn't call this time). I naively believed these were sincere efforts on the part of Honda and Holmes to hold and maintain customer loyalty. I now view those contacts as hypocrisy. It was just PR. I love my Hondas. Honda makes a great car. Drive great - few problems. Why they would jeopardize customer loyalty for $300 is beyond me. Buyer beware!
Mike
Radford,#3Consumer Suggestion
Wed, November 16, 2005
You need to be specific. If you said "replace the seal on the left side," (the Lynchburg dealer's recommendation) then they shouldn't have touched the other one. If you just said "the transmission is leaking" it's not unreasonable for them to replace both seals to avoid future problems with the other one. You need to talk about the cost of the job upfront. Ask for an "out the door" price on the replacement of the one leaky seal. This will make it clear to them that you're only willing to pay for the one seal. The person checking you in is the service writer, not necessarily a tech. He's more of a salesman than a mechanic. They should have sold the flush job (and the replacement of the other seal) in advance rather than just doing it. Especially since you didn't talk price at the outset, they assumed you would be willing to just do it. If you were pouring in ordinary ATF instead of Honda spec in order to get home, it was well worth it to flush it all out and refill with the right stuff, regardless of how dirty it may have been.
Paul
Marshall,#4Author of original report
Tue, November 15, 2005
Response to Cory's rebuttal - Cory makes an apparent valid point that the second seal might be expected to fail soon after the first. I would have accepted that argument if Holmes had used that logic. They didn't and they didn't know of the documented problem/estimate provided by the Lynchburg dealer. There was no 'maybe'! Both seals needed replacement. Regarding the flush - This car has been maintained as suggested by the manufacturer recommendation. The transmission fluid was changed at 90K - When the service tech was questioned, he said the oil was dirty. I know this to be untrue as I checked the transmission level regularly on my journey back to Texas. When challenged, the tech changed his story saying the oil should have been dark red (not clear). After these repairs were made, I could see not difference in oil color though I'll admit I was more interested in level not color as I drove home. The issue that goes to the core of this complaint is Holmes' policy of paying techs (the guy that checks you in) on commission. How can this be to the customer's advantage? What controls are in place to prevent a tech from inflating repair needs to their financial advantage? When challenged, the tech said, 'he just wouldn't do that.' Sadly, I don't believe him. Regard Holmes policy of paying techs on commission. I know it's true. When the car was brought in at 101K for serving, another tech informed me that I would need to replace the timing belt at 105K. She asked if I wanted to have that repair made at that time. When I said I'd wait, she asked that I ask for her as 'we are paid on commission'. Like a good loyal customer, I did.
Paul
Marshall,#5Author of original report
Tue, November 15, 2005
Response to Cory's rebuttal - Cory makes an apparent valid point that the second seal might be expected to fail soon after the first. I would have accepted that argument if Holmes had used that logic. They didn't and they didn't know of the documented problem/estimate provided by the Lynchburg dealer. There was no 'maybe'! Both seals needed replacement. Regarding the flush - This car has been maintained as suggested by the manufacturer recommendation. The transmission fluid was changed at 90K - When the service tech was questioned, he said the oil was dirty. I know this to be untrue as I checked the transmission level regularly on my journey back to Texas. When challenged, the tech changed his story saying the oil should have been dark red (not clear). After these repairs were made, I could see not difference in oil color though I'll admit I was more interested in level not color as I drove home. The issue that goes to the core of this complaint is Holmes' policy of paying techs (the guy that checks you in) on commission. How can this be to the customer's advantage? What controls are in place to prevent a tech from inflating repair needs to their financial advantage? When challenged, the tech said, 'he just wouldn't do that.' Sadly, I don't believe him. Regard Holmes policy of paying techs on commission. I know it's true. When the car was brought in at 101K for serving, another tech informed me that I would need to replace the timing belt at 105K. She asked if I wanted to have that repair made at that time. When I said I'd wait, she asked that I ask for her as 'we are paid on commission'. Like a good loyal customer, I did.
Robert
Jacksonville,#6Consumer Comment
Tue, November 15, 2005
I will assume the "seals" you refer to are the axle seals. These are where the CV Axles go into the transaxle. The $100 price to do one is about right for that, so figure double that for two, and add another $100 for a flush. All automatic transmissions/transaxles should be flushed at least every 100K miles. This is what is known as preventive maintenance. Honda requires the use of special friction modifiers in their fluid, so it is priced a bit higher than regular Dexron3. If one axle seal is bad, the other one is on it's way. Compare it to a headlight. They both have the same time on them. When one burns out, you'll replace the other within a few weeks. $318 from a dealership sounds like a very good price. They did you a favor. As for the theory that you were going to sell the car soon, nope. I hear that every day. It's always when someone wants to be CHEAP, instead of being right. Go back to the dealership and thank the mechanic for saving you the expense of being broken down in the near future. Honda trannies are very expensive. Figure to spend about $3000 to replace one.
Cory
San Antonio,#7Consumer Comment
Tue, November 15, 2005
You bring up an interesting point. The first dealer was going to replace one seal. The second was going to replace both seals AND flush the transmission. You don't say if the first was going to do any other work. I don't know much about vehicles but, to my way of thinking, if one of the seals was bad, there's a fair chance the second could be right behind it. Also if you have to drain the trans fluid out of the transmission, I'd either flush(clean) it or replace it. Your vehicle has 116,000 miles on it, so they seem to have been doing something right. Maybe I'm wrong. Let's hear from Robert in FL. I have an indepandant mechanic that I've used for 15+ years, that I trust and refer many people to. They are hard to come by, Burt's the best.