;
  • Report:  #441056

Complaint Review: Humane Society - Baytown Humane Society - Rescue Group - BACCR.org Member Of TARPA - Baytown Texas

Reported By:
- Houston, Texas,
Submitted:
Updated:

Humane Society - Baytown Humane Society - Rescue Group - BACCR.org Member Of TARPA
www.baccr.org Baytown, Texas, U.S.A.
Web:
N/A
Categories:
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good? What's this?
Potential Adopters Beware -

According to the State Attorney General's Office Website: Identity Theft occurrs when someone uses your information without your permission which can be your name, your phone number, your address, your DL#, your SS#.

A certain person that will remain nameless has blatently admitted that my information was used in a background check without any prior disclosure to do so. You see reviewing an application and doing a background check are two different things one needs permission and full disclosure. Surely we can follow the letter of the law or is it just for certain persons...

My information was floating around like a ping pong ball without blocking any personal information. I think we would all like a little respect with our personal information in this day in age.

If you see red flags such as stated on the title above steer clear.

I was yelled at in all caps in 2 different emails. Then the person insinuated I had not been truthful, when in fact I had.

She wrote I was not suited to "owning a dog". Notice her word choice "own" not a very pet friendly chairperson. The correct term is adopt a pet.

She tried to defend herself by stating to me she didn't violate my privacy by doing a public information search ...but in reality she did commit identity theft according to the Texas Attorney General's Office Web Site definition.

I requested she backspace over my information before deleting it and shred any paper regarding myself or family member. I have not seen a response to this request yet.

I requested that her organization include a statement of disclosure on the e-application which would read something to the effect of The information on this form will be verified in a background check , criminal check, credit check, etc. and will be held securely on file for such and such time or shreded if rejected. Any personal information will be encrypted for your security when used in e-mails.

Hopefully all rescue groups will respect our information and disclose to us what they intend to do with our informtion in writing on the form.

We feel violated. We would not have filled and application had there been disclosure up front on the application, every time someone searches you you become more searchable and the more credit reports done on you your credit score goes down. It would have been okay had they encrypted our personal information and made a privacy statement on their site. It would have been okay had she not been rude and yelled at me in caps and insinuated I was untruthful and better off not "owning a dog".

I reminded her that for every pet/dog they hang onto one dies that could have been saved.

Another case of Ego over Priorities--pretty sad to be petty over miscommunications or have to deal with God complexes of non-profit.

If I don't get my request fulfilled, then I will do it through the Attorney General's Office through a formal complaint against the non-profit for deceptive trade practices. I'm going to give it a grace period of 3 business days. Today is 4/5/09.

Texastexter

Houston, Texas

U.S.A.


1 Updates & Rebuttals

Animal Advocate

Baytown,
Texas,
U.S.A.
YOU be the judge!

#2REBUTTAL Individual responds

Fri, May 01, 2009

Everyone can come to their own conclusion about the validity of this woman's complaint against our organization. I'm posting the correspondence thread between the 'complainant' and myself about her application to adopt a dog from Baytown Humane Society. This organization is considering legal action against the complainant for her libelous attack on a highly regarded group that for 10 years has done excellent work on behalf of homeless, helpless animals. There are important bits of information that the complainant failed to share with everyone! For example, The reason she gave for applying to adopt this particular dog is: "He is small and the color of hotchocolate. It is hard to find a hotchocolate colored small dog." Is this to be considered a valid reason for taking on the financial, emotional and time expenditure for another living creature over the next 8 to 10 years?? Also, the complainant said that she owns her own home, and the public records said otherwise. The question is posed because often renters will adopt pets and then have to give them up because the landlord won't allow them. The poor animal then winds up who knows where. We try to insure that the applicant owns the home, or if they are renters, that the landlord is OK with a pet living in the residence. The reports of Yelling in two different emails are ridiculous. The name of the true owner of the home is in all caps on the record. I literally copied and pasted it from the public record. I suppose that is her claim of my "yelling" at her. I did, however, actually type the words, "No One," in all caps in an effort to calm her hysteria. I would also like to point out that no one forces anyone to complete a form! If the complainant was unhappy with the questions or felt in any way compromised, she needn't have sent the application in to begin with. There are other salient points to be made, but I've already spent too much valuable time on this nonsense, and past sharing with everyone the correspondence between myself and this woman, any further time can be expended by our lawyers. To follow is the correspondence that ensued after we received her application, with the ONLY alterations being the removal of names and email addresses. This woman did email back another response, but it was deleted unread. _______________ In a message dated 4/4/2009 Central Daylight Time, writes: NO ONE did a background check on you or your mother! The name was found in public records, therefore, no privacy has been violated. It only indicates that you were not truthful on your application. I agree that you are much better suited for sending bikes than owning pets. Good Choice! "Think occasionally of the suffering of which you spare yourself the sight." Albert Schweitzer In a message dated 4/4/2009 4:08:20 P.M. Central Daylight Time, writes: Dear Chairman, It is my elderly mother. I did not give your group permission to do a background check on me or my mother and to do so is a violation of our rights, you need to put a disclosure on the the aplication page in plain sight. Now you are emailing it back and forth in an insecure setting, which is very unsettling to me and irresponsible on your groups part --considering there is breech of security on the web currently via the April fools worms. I am requesting that you shred my and my mother's personal information and delete it from your organisation effective immediately 4/4/09. Your organization has not listed a full disclosure of rights to privacy to unassuming applicants which your organization puts at risk for cybercrimes. I feel very violated that your organization is so careless with applicant information. In this request I would hope your organization will rise to the occasion and put the disclosure and intentions in plain sight on the application page. Thank you for your attention in this matter. Thank you for rescuing animals from death at temporary shelters. In lieu of adopting a family pet we will be sending bikes to Africa, via Unicef, which saves hundreds of peoples lives by transporting / distributing medicine. So thank you for being a catalyst. -----Original Message----- From: Sent: Apr 4, 2009 9:36 AM To: Subject: Re: Thank you for submitting the online pet adoption application for Yoda. You mention that you are self employed. Please share with us the name of your company or explain your self employment. Also, we are wondering who this person is: Thanks so much. When I get this information from you, I'll send it along with your original application to the Review Committee. "Think occasionally of the suffering of which you spare yourself the sight." Albert Schweitzer

Reports & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
Also a victim?
Repair Your Reputation!
//