- Report: #183003
Complaint Review: Judge Teresa Baca Judge Nan G. Nash Attorney Peter Johnstone Attorney William Bo Frazier - ALbuquerque New Mexico
-
Author Confirmed
Why?
Judge Teresa Baca Judge Nan G. Nash Attorney Peter Johnstone Attorney William Bo Frazier
400 Lomas NW ALbuquerque, 87102 New Mexico, U.S.A.
Phone:
505-841-7512
Web:
N/A
Categories:
Business Rating:
(0)
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good?
Judge Teresa Baca, Judge Nan G. Nash, Attorney Peter Johnstone, Attorney William Bo Frazier Corrupt Judges and Attorneys Second District Court od New Mexico Albuquerque New Mexico
Warning! The Second District Court od New Mexico has as in any system, good Judges and Attorneys and a small cabal of really corrupt judges and attorneys working together for their own personal profit and the Law anf Justice be damned.
While the problem may go well beyond the indfividuals names in this report, it is well to be aware that these individuals should be avoided at all costs, unless you are devoid of a conscience and are looking to pay money to put the "fix" in in the Second District Court.
How does a Judge refuse to hear motions properly filed by an attorney, an officer of the court, and back this refusal up with the threat of sending both the Petitioner and Respondent to jail if forced to hear the Motions before the Court? This simple but effective exclusion of evidence allows the Court to proceed in a fashion that allows the appointment of friendly attorneys as Special Masters to bleed funds from the assets of the parties involved.
Special Masters are appointed in these cases at fees of $300.00 per hour and do absolutely nothing but create further problems through either ignorance or negligence.
How does a Judge take a rational and equitable decision when material facts are not allowed to be entered into the court record? Without facts in the record, they are enabling themselves to find ways to grease each other's palms.
Having grown up in Chicago in the 1960's I thought I had seen it all, with dead people voting as street people were taken from polling station to polling station to vote each time for a shot of booze. In the 40 years since the 1960's I thought that things had improved in this country and the abuses of the past were just that. I have been assaulted, burglarized, shot by person/s unknown and totally worked over by a corrupt judicial system. Is this what I worked hard for over 35 years of my life for? Is this what I paid 35 years of taxes for?
Although the baltant violations noted here of the Justice system were recorded, I expect, when this finally comes to the Judicial Review Committee (if it actually is allowed to get that far) that there will most likely be missing tapes, or blank unaudible sections of tape. How else will the Judge be able to defend such an outrageous position?
As this progresses, I shall update this report. Should a monthly update or conclusion not appear, assume that I have been permanently silenced.
Withheld for personal safety
Albuquerque, New Mexico
U.S.A.
While the problem may go well beyond the indfividuals names in this report, it is well to be aware that these individuals should be avoided at all costs, unless you are devoid of a conscience and are looking to pay money to put the "fix" in in the Second District Court.
How does a Judge refuse to hear motions properly filed by an attorney, an officer of the court, and back this refusal up with the threat of sending both the Petitioner and Respondent to jail if forced to hear the Motions before the Court? This simple but effective exclusion of evidence allows the Court to proceed in a fashion that allows the appointment of friendly attorneys as Special Masters to bleed funds from the assets of the parties involved.
Special Masters are appointed in these cases at fees of $300.00 per hour and do absolutely nothing but create further problems through either ignorance or negligence.
How does a Judge take a rational and equitable decision when material facts are not allowed to be entered into the court record? Without facts in the record, they are enabling themselves to find ways to grease each other's palms.
Having grown up in Chicago in the 1960's I thought I had seen it all, with dead people voting as street people were taken from polling station to polling station to vote each time for a shot of booze. In the 40 years since the 1960's I thought that things had improved in this country and the abuses of the past were just that. I have been assaulted, burglarized, shot by person/s unknown and totally worked over by a corrupt judicial system. Is this what I worked hard for over 35 years of my life for? Is this what I paid 35 years of taxes for?
Although the baltant violations noted here of the Justice system were recorded, I expect, when this finally comes to the Judicial Review Committee (if it actually is allowed to get that far) that there will most likely be missing tapes, or blank unaudible sections of tape. How else will the Judge be able to defend such an outrageous position?
As this progresses, I shall update this report. Should a monthly update or conclusion not appear, assume that I have been permanently silenced.
Withheld for personal safety
Albuquerque, New Mexico
U.S.A.
2 Updates & Rebuttals
Straight talk
Las Vegas,Nevada,
United States of America
Rebuttal to Jennifer
#2General Comment
Fri, May 20, 2011
Jennifer; with 10 years in the NM Judicial System you may be a little prejudiced. You don't happen to clerk for one of those reported on do you?
None of the attorneys listed represented "Barry" thus the assumption that there is a dissatisfaction and a failure to understand is erroneous. There is nothing confusing. With an IQ over 2 times the State average in New Mexico, we know that "Barry" was quite capable of understanding and researching the various individuals involved.
Perhaps a history lesson on how Judge Teresa Baca received her judicial appointment would shed some light on her qualification. A further review of complaints filed with the Judicial Review Committee would also be an eye opener.
So the facts are 100% straight, there was no minor child involved in the referenced divorce proceeding, thus no Child Support as an issue. Who is slinging the mud? I would imagine there are a lot of low life parents who would simply walk away and not care to support their children. This case does not fit that mold.
Peter Johnstone failed to perform the Special Master duties assigned and proceeded to provide erroneous information (would quialif as perjury if under oath). Thsi was fully documented by licensed real estate and escrow agents in a different State where the sale of property was in play. Billing for actual work is to be compensated; there is no argument with that.
I agree, no reader should rely on "Bary's" opinion. They should however take note, do their own research and possibly enlist the assistance of Not for Profit Groups with no dog in the fight like the Advocacy Response Foundation to seek guidance from.
The only redeeming factor with Baca and Nash is that they were not appointed by Bill Richardson.
No slander, just a thumbnail of thousands of pages of documentation.
Jennifer
Albuquerque,New Mexico,
U.S.A.
Not So Fast
#3Consumer Comment
Wed, June 11, 2008
I have worked in the NM Judicial System for the last 10 years. The mudslinging "Barry" has enjoyed here is strictly that. Not everyone comes up happy in a court of law. Nor is the average citizen well-versed in the minutia of the law, so court proceedings and rulings can be confusing. That doesn't make your attorney or the presiding judge corrupt. Judge Theresa Baca is truly a dream judge - her decisions are fair based on the facts presented and she is not afraid to make a decision. Nor does she feel the need to throw around the weight of her power as a judge to make herself feel important. Judge Nan Nash until recently has worked in the family courts, and I can assume that "Barry" is dealing with some child support issues which he would rather not deal with. Having said that, Judge Nash is not the most knowledgeable civil court judge and it is worth rolling the dice in disqualifying her if she is assigned to your civil case. Peter Johnstone is an EXCELLENT attorney. I have used him as my personal attorney and have been involved in cases where he was appointed Special Master *at the request of the parties.* His counsel is invaluable. Because a Special Master bills for her/his time does not mean they are "bleeding" anyone. Mr. Frazier I do not know and cannot speak to his practice or reputation. But the others named are being unfairly slandered, and any potential litigants should definitely not rely on "Barry's" opinions posted here.
