Do the Right Thing
Houston,#2REBUTTAL Owner of company
Fri, January 20, 2017
My kid has been in TKD and we have used Memeber Solutiions for almost 10 years. Maybe twice, I've created problems by changing credit cards or changing the dates on which I wanted auto-billing charged.
In every case, the staff was extraordinary in accommodating me and doing whatever necessary to bend the rules to my individual circumstance.
As with any contract, once you sign it, both aprties are expected to fufill their obligations. Those who don't pay are considered deadbeats in my neck of the woods.
Member Solutions loaned you something around ~ $1,000 and forwarded it to the Do Jang. 'same as if you borrowed $800,000 for a house or $40,000 for a car from a bank. The lender is entitled to reimbursement for the length of the loan contract, whether the car got stolen, you abandoned the house or your kid decided to take up basket weaving.
The issue is betwwen you, who is the one trying to breach the contract, and the Do Jang, who actually received the cash up front. I'd suggest that you either work with the Do Jang for a refund or find someone who woudl like to take over your contract and reimburse you month-to-month.
GGGGGGGGG (jeeeez), no business could stay in business if contracts were subject to personal whim.
Grow up and wear helmet when you spar.
Flynrider
Phoeix,#3Consumer Comment
Tue, October 28, 2008
First of all, the Tae Kwon Do school is not holding your 5 yr. old to a 1 yr. contract (which would be illegal). They are holding you to a 1 yr. contract, which you admit you knowingly signed. You correctly state that the issue is that your son has now decided he is not interested in Tae Kwon Do. Why should that be the school's problem? The contract was an agreement to pay for one year's worth of lessons. Of course it's the college's option to let you out of the contract, but you certainly have no right to be let off the hook. You state that you think it's a bit ridiculous to be held to the contract. I don't know why. The whole purpose of the contract was to provide lessons at a given price for a specified term.
Flynrider
Phoeix,#4Consumer Comment
Tue, October 28, 2008
First of all, the Tae Kwon Do school is not holding your 5 yr. old to a 1 yr. contract (which would be illegal). They are holding you to a 1 yr. contract, which you admit you knowingly signed. You correctly state that the issue is that your son has now decided he is not interested in Tae Kwon Do. Why should that be the school's problem? The contract was an agreement to pay for one year's worth of lessons. Of course it's the college's option to let you out of the contract, but you certainly have no right to be let off the hook. You state that you think it's a bit ridiculous to be held to the contract. I don't know why. The whole purpose of the contract was to provide lessons at a given price for a specified term.
Flynrider
Phoeix,#5Consumer Comment
Tue, October 28, 2008
First of all, the Tae Kwon Do school is not holding your 5 yr. old to a 1 yr. contract (which would be illegal). They are holding you to a 1 yr. contract, which you admit you knowingly signed. You correctly state that the issue is that your son has now decided he is not interested in Tae Kwon Do. Why should that be the school's problem? The contract was an agreement to pay for one year's worth of lessons. Of course it's the college's option to let you out of the contract, but you certainly have no right to be let off the hook. You state that you think it's a bit ridiculous to be held to the contract. I don't know why. The whole purpose of the contract was to provide lessons at a given price for a specified term.