Michele
Sherman,#2Consumer Comment
Sun, May 04, 2003
Hello. The N.A.H.B. is one of the BIGGEST political contributors, that there are. (That can be verified.) The members of the N.A.H.B. include such people as David Weekley. (I'm sure you've heard of "Weekley Homes" - There have been MANY consumer complaints about THOSE homes that have been built, and lawsuits filed.) Another member of the N.A.H.B. is Richard Fuller (I'm sure you've heard of "Fuller Homes"; "Richard Fuller Homes". - There have been MANY consumer complaints about THOSE homes being built, too...and many lawsuits filed. TX; OK; and NM) Right now...the N.A.H.B. are trying to get the following laws passed through Congress, for every state (state by state): The N.A.H.B. want all future homebuyers to HAVE to agree to "Binding Arbitration". - "Binding Arbitration" is NOT done by an "unbiased" third party (like they want you to belive.) - & almost always sides with everyone BUT the consumer/homebuyer. - "Binding Arbitration" costs much, much more...than taking a lawsuit to court. - "Binding Arbitration" also usually includes a "gag order", whereas the consumer/homebuyer cannot ever talk of their case again. (AND WARN OTHER CONSUMERS ABOUT THE FRAUDULENT HOMEBUILDER) - "Binding Arbitration" is being hollered by people who are for so-called "lawsuit reform". (But on the flip side...the N.A.H.B./ and other homebuilders state: they have a "95 % customer satisfaction rating." (Then why holler about lawsuits ??? You can't have it BOTH ways. - something is not TRUE here.) - Homebuyers give homebuilders MORE than enough time to fix their shoddy construction...before the homebuyers decides their ONLY recourse IS a lawsuit. (We are talking approximately 2 years time...that they are allowing these fraudulent builders to fix things.) The N.A.H.B. is one of the biggest political contributors/ The N.A.H.B. wants Congress to pass laws that will benefit ONLY them. (The fraudulent builders who are ending up in lawsuits...are the ones who want these crazy laws passed.) (Put 2 & 2 together. It's called "pay offs"; "bribes"; "political corruption".)
#30
Sun, January 20, 2002
They filed the following rebuttal to the above Rip-Off Report: Their email: [email protected] Their name: CS Their relationship to the company: Advocate Rebuttal: You know that any "clean-ups" of brownfields, if the NAHB has full authority in this, will be insufficient, because that would eat into the profits...that's why they want to absolve developers of liability and even disclosure.