- Report: #14929
Complaint Review: Robert Lindenblatt-Cambridge Camera World Inc - New York New York
-
Author Not Confirmed
Why?
Robert Lindenblatt-Cambridge Camera World Inc
119 West 17th Street New York, 10011 New York, U.S.A.
Web:
N/A
Categories:
Business Rating:
(0)
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good?
Mail and Internet Fraude by Cambridge Camera
Below is a letter that my daughter an attorney has submitted to Camberidge Camera---We would like to contact others who have been ripped off by the company:
Mr. Robert Lindenblatt
Cambridge Camera World, Inc.
119 West 17th Street
New York, New York 10011
Dear Mr. Lindenblatt:
On March 9, 2001 my client, Dr. Curtis H. Bourgeois, forwarded a check in the amount of $1719.90 for the purchase of an Olympus Camedia E-10 Camera, along with a purchase order to Cambridge World.com. The check was cashed on March 14, 2001.
My client's office staff contacted Mr. Scott in your Customer Service Dept. on 4-6-01, they were advised that the camera was on back order and should be delivered in 10 days,
When the camera was not delivered, Dr Bourgeois personally contacted Mr. Scott on
5-1-01 and was advised that it would be delivered in one week.
On May 17, 2001, when the camera was not delivered as promised, in a registered letter, Dr. Bourgeois cancelled the contract for the camera and requested a refund of all monies paid to you.
In multiple conversations with Mr. Scott, we were advised that a refund would be forthcoming.
To date, we have not received the refund. We have attempted, through the Better Business Bureau and the State Attorney Generals Office, to settle this matter without taking legal action, but you have yet to cooperate in any settlement negotiations.
We will file suit for breach of contract on March 9, 2001, if we have not had a response from you in the form of a check in the amount of $1719.90.
Sincerely,
Karen Bourgeois
Attorney-At-Law
Enclosures
Click here to read other Rip-off Reports on Cambridge Camera
ALSO:
STOP! ..before you think about using the Better Business Bureau (BBB)... click here to see how other consumers were victimized by the BBB's false or misleading information. Don't be fooled! When there are thousands of complaints and other investigations underway by authorities, the BBB has no choice but to finally give an UNsatisfactory rating to a BBB member business that is paying the BBB big membership fees every year. When a business is reported that is NOT a BBB member, BBB files WILL more likely show an UNsatisfactory rating, then reportedly shake down that company to become a member of the BBB. One positive thing about the BBB is, either way, if a business has an unsatisfactory rating with the BBB, you can be sure, the business is bad. But what about all those BBB member businesses that had complaints filed against them? Consumers never get to hear about them. What about the BBB advertising to the public? Is this a false and misleading perception they are giving about consumer confidence when dealing with a business? Click here to understand more of what consumers and business alike are saying about the BBB. You decide.
Mr. Robert Lindenblatt
Cambridge Camera World, Inc.
119 West 17th Street
New York, New York 10011
Dear Mr. Lindenblatt:
On March 9, 2001 my client, Dr. Curtis H. Bourgeois, forwarded a check in the amount of $1719.90 for the purchase of an Olympus Camedia E-10 Camera, along with a purchase order to Cambridge World.com. The check was cashed on March 14, 2001.
My client's office staff contacted Mr. Scott in your Customer Service Dept. on 4-6-01, they were advised that the camera was on back order and should be delivered in 10 days,
When the camera was not delivered, Dr Bourgeois personally contacted Mr. Scott on
5-1-01 and was advised that it would be delivered in one week.
On May 17, 2001, when the camera was not delivered as promised, in a registered letter, Dr. Bourgeois cancelled the contract for the camera and requested a refund of all monies paid to you.
In multiple conversations with Mr. Scott, we were advised that a refund would be forthcoming.
To date, we have not received the refund. We have attempted, through the Better Business Bureau and the State Attorney Generals Office, to settle this matter without taking legal action, but you have yet to cooperate in any settlement negotiations.
We will file suit for breach of contract on March 9, 2001, if we have not had a response from you in the form of a check in the amount of $1719.90.
Sincerely,
Karen Bourgeois
Attorney-At-Law
Enclosures
Click here to read other Rip-off Reports on Cambridge Camera
ALSO:
STOP! ..before you think about using the Better Business Bureau (BBB)... click here to see how other consumers were victimized by the BBB's false or misleading information. Don't be fooled! When there are thousands of complaints and other investigations underway by authorities, the BBB has no choice but to finally give an UNsatisfactory rating to a BBB member business that is paying the BBB big membership fees every year. When a business is reported that is NOT a BBB member, BBB files WILL more likely show an UNsatisfactory rating, then reportedly shake down that company to become a member of the BBB. One positive thing about the BBB is, either way, if a business has an unsatisfactory rating with the BBB, you can be sure, the business is bad. But what about all those BBB member businesses that had complaints filed against them? Consumers never get to hear about them. What about the BBB advertising to the public? Is this a false and misleading perception they are giving about consumer confidence when dealing with a business? Click here to understand more of what consumers and business alike are saying about the BBB. You decide.
