Please everyone beaware, George McGee of SA Investment and Hussain Khan and Earl White are Scam Artist. As you can see in the title they go by many different names. We signed a contract for a Stand By Letter of Credit, and was in the process of sending the Payment Guarantee and George McGee and Company have disapeared. They want people to send a Condtional Payment (ICBPO) so they can do bye and sell oil transactions.
They never are intended to give you a Bank Instrument
Beaware here are two accounts they use to scam people
BARCLAYS BANK PLC
LIVERPOOL BRANCH, UK
ACCOUNT NAME:
J. H. LEWIS CAPITAL LTD / M.M.M ASHRAF
ACCOUNT NUMBER:
GB90BARC 2050 XXXX XXXXXX
SWIFT CODE:
BARCGB22
INTERNATIONAL BANK OF QATAR
P.O BOX 2001 SUHAIM BIN HAMAD STREET, DOHA STATE OF QATAR
Account Name:
MOHAMMAD MIQDAD M. ASHRAF
Account Number
3-160226-001
Wording of there instruments
WE,-----------------------THE BANK, HAVING AN ADDRESS AT---------------- , HEREBY CONFIRM WITH FULL BANK RESPONSIBILITY AND LIABILITY THAT OUR CLIENT-----------------------------HAS ON DEPOSITS WITH OUR BANK UNDER THEIR SOLE SIGNATURE IN ACCOUNT NUMBER---------------- (or IBAN NUMBER: -----------------), THE SUM OF
XXXXXXXX MILLION US DOLLARS (XXXX,000,000.00 USD /EURO) . THESE FUNDS ARE CLEAN, CLEARED, OF NON-CRIMINAL ORIGIN AND ARE FREE OFANY LIENS AND ENCUMBRANCES AND ARE AVAILABLE TO THE CLIENT WITHOUT ANY RESTRICTIONS.
THESE FUNDARECURRENTLY PUT ON ADMINISTRATIVEHOLD FOR THE BENEFIT OF MOHAMMAD MIQDAD M.ASHRAF FOR THE PERIOD OF 60 DAYS VALIDITY OF THIS INSTRUMENTTHIS INSTRUMENT IS VERIFIABLE AND CONFIRMABLE BY REPONSIBLE BANK INQUIRY AND IS SUBJECT TO THE UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE AND IS GIVEN FOR AND ON
BEHALF OF …………………………………., THE ISSUER.
The whole thing is 60 days to get a credit line and do OIL transactions with Breeze Oil and GAS
Beaware I have reported them all to FBI and INTERPROL
IF YOU BEEN SCAMMED EMAIL ME I HAVE A COMPLETE FILE ON THEM WE CAN GO TO THE AUTHORITES TOGETHER THIS SCAM ARTIST NEEDS TO BE STOPPED
Hussain Khan, Tokyo
Tokyo,#2REBUTTAL Individual responds
Thu, November 07, 2013
TRUTH ABOUT THE PROVIDER
Here are the replies given to a client’ s questions about the Provider and our US Attorney.
As regards your other mail about smelling something, I will reply to your questions in detail. This mail is only about contacting Attorney R****.
I had provided the details of the Attorney R**** to you and all other clients. As a result many of them contacted him and he got disturbed too much.
We have been refused by another US Attorney for a similar reason earlier.
Their income from our work is peanuts for them. They get only 5% of $60,000, i.e. just $3,000. They do not want to waste their time for such a small amount and to attend telephone inquiries of our many clients. Only a few are really serious clients but almost all of them call to the Attorney.
As you can see from the mail below that Provider does not want Attorney R*** to be disturbed any more. He is going to appoint a colleague of Attorney R****.
As soon as I get details of the new Attorney, I will send you those details enabling you to contact him for your satisfaction.
Please wait for it and avoid contacting Attorney R****, as he is no more prepared to work for us.
There is nothing to get offended in such matters.
1) I never felt any need to contact Provider on landlines but I have chatted with him long several times on Skype. I avoid talking on Skype with anyone, as my hearing is not good and I sometimes misunderstand what the other party is saying. In case of Provider, I want all his commitments and promises in writing and I keep those conversations in my record to refer back to him, if he forgets any of them any time. But I never had to do so, as he did not back out from any of his commitments.
Some clients who wanted to talk to him directly, he gave me the time and the day of the week to contact him. For example, he does not want to talk on Mondays. They have talked to him on landline. If you also want to directly talk with him, I will ask him what time and date is suitable for receiving your telephone call to him.
2) I felt no need to check all that. Some clients appear to have done that. No one has complained that his address or Registration is wrong.
My philosophy to check Fraud and Scam is different. Even if a Provider is a Fraud or Scammer, I believe to have such Procedure that the client remains safe.
Every Provider, including mine, wants Escrow money to be directly sent to him. Even a genuine Provider needs that money to pay cash to the TOP Bank, as no Top Bank issues any BG without some collateral in its hands. In such cases, all genuine Providers have to use their own personal money to deposit with the Issuing bank. Without such a deposit, no Top Bank issues BG MT760 on 5 days credit to the client.
But, on the other hand, this is dangerous for a client. I have persuaded and insisted on my Provider to appoint an Attorney for Escrow Deposit.
Some of the fake Providers have disappeared after getting client money. But I have never heard any several-year old Law firm of US with reputable Attorneys having disappeared after getting any client money. US laws are very strict and such Attorneys, if any, have to lose their license for whole life. They cannot continue as an Attorney in US. They will have to lose their life-long career, whereas they can earn much more money than our client’s $60,000 by continuing their career as Attorneys. They have spent several decades of their life from boyhood to adulthood to get qualified as an Attorney. No Attorney would like to lose his efforts of several years to get an Attorney’s license.
In case of remittance going to Attorney’s account, it never goes to Provider account. It remains with him as a Sacred Deposit until the successful end of the entire Transaction. It goes to Provider only if a client does not pay BG cost 9 + 3 after receiving BG within 5 days.
Under this Procedure, a client remains safe, even if a Provider is a Fraud or Scammer.
2) I had no opportunity, nor any need to contact Attorney R****. But many of my clients have contacted him directly and have expressed their confidence in him.
In case of one client, he even refused to receive any Escrow Deposit in ADVANCE. He wanted Parties, the Client and the Provider, mutually first sign all Agreements under which he will have to take care of the Escrow Deposit.
4) My confidence in the Provider is also based on two more factors, as below:
A) He has a Malaysian Chinese also as his Mandate. He has been working with George for last 2 years and has also closed a few small deals. He has not found anything wrong with this Provider.
B) About 6-months back, a French client of mine could not provide MT799 Blockfunds after getting our Contract. She suddenly sent EURO100,000 directly to the Provider account even without consulting me. The Provider sent that money to a Top Bank and told her that she will receive BG tomorrow from the Top Bank. But the Top Bank did not send any BG even after a week. It was a big surprise for everyone including the Provider. He visited London to find out the cause of BG not being issued. It was found that the banker of the TOP Bank disappeared with the money Provider had sent to the TOP Bank. Thus BG was not issued. I do not know how the Top Bank settled this matter with the Provider. But the client lost confidence with the Provider and claimed her Euro100,000 back.
Had this Provider been a fake, Fraud and a Scammer, it was a good chance for him to disappear or run away with client’s Euro100,000. But he did not run away with that money and is still working on the same address and under the same name and company as before. He settled the matter with client somehow, the details of which are not known to me.
After my personal experience of this incident, my confidence in the Provider has grown 100% that he is not a fake Provider.
I thank you for your questions, as that has provided me the occasion to clarify several matters about the Provider.
Regards,
Hussain Khan, Tokyo
Contact [email protected] and [email protected]
Skype: hkhanjp
Visit www.pakmarine.net for details
There is no clause to release your Escrow deposit to the Provider.
“Trustee holder (Attorney) shall withhold the funds until all duties are complied, keeping all parties informed.
IN CASE PROVIDER FAILS TO ISSUE MT760 WITHIN (10) TEN DAYS AS AGREED,
THEN THE ESCROW TRUSTEE AGENT SHALL RELEASE THE MONEY (XXX,000 USD) TO THE LEESEE
WITHOUT ANY PROTEST AND AFTER DEDUCTION OF AGREED UPON FEES AND/OR COST.”
Escrow Deposit is never released to the Provider. It always remains with the most reliable 50-year old US Law firm. It is refunded back to you. It will remain with the neutral 3rd Party US Attorney till the successful execution of the Contract by all the Parties, the client and the Provider. In case of dispute between the Provider and the client claims, the matter will be ARBITRATED by the Los Angeles Bar Association as per the Contract with the Attorney given below. There is no clause to release your Escrow deposit to the Provider. On the basis of this assurance, Provider pays his own money as Deposit to the Issuing Bank to let it issue BG. If client does not pay 9 + 3 BG cost, then this Deposit will not be refunded to the client by the US attorney. In such a case it will be released to the Provider. But in case of Monetizing by the same Provider, such a case of not paying BG cost 9 + 3 will never arise. Therefore Attorney will have to refund it to the client. I am giving below the verbiage of the proposed Escrow Contracts with the Attorney and with the Provider. Please inform and correct me, if you find anything in Escrow contracts with the US Attorney and with that of the Provider against my above interpretation of the Escrow Contracts. Regards, Hussain Khan, Tokyo Contact [email protected] and [email protected] Skype: hkhanjp Visit www.pakmarine.net for details
|
Hussain Khan, M. A., Tokyo
Tokyo,#3REBUTTAL Individual responds
Tue, November 05, 2013
This is an update to my Rebuttal already published earlier on the link:
Only my name, Hussain Khan, has been mentioned in the Report, but I do not find any definite allegation against me or my company Pak Marine Ltd. for which I have a website since long, pakmarine.net
It is a clear proof that Mr. Williams D**** could not find any concrete allegation against me as to what harm I have done to him?
I was not bothering to issue a rebuttal of this report but I received a link of this report from a recent client:
----------Quote========================================
We have found an article while surfing the net.
Please visit this link and advise us accordingly.
--------------------------UNQUOTE--------------------------------------
To satisfy my clients who come across this Report I am issuing the following rebuttal of these false allegations made against me (Hussain Khan, Tokyo,) against Earl White and against George.
I know about this story. William D…. is a Vice President of ……..Airlines He applied for a 500M BG through me. It was going to be issued on Monday that he started making accusations against me, against Earl White and against George on Saturday and Sunday, just one or 2 days before he was to get papers from us.
George got angry on these allegations that he is a scam artist and etc. and naturally refused to send him RWA enabling him to issue ICBPO.
William D…got angry on a report from a Ashraf Deal in the past, about which I also know nothing.
He has accused me and Earl White also. But there is no definite or concrete accusation as to what harm have we done to him?
Even against George ………he has no definite or concrete accusation as to what harm he did to William D….., except that he refused to issue him RWA.
However, in all his accusations, you will not find any definite matter that we have harmed him except that George refused to deal with him.
He did not inform what scam George did with him? George is there and has not disappeared from that address. All his accusations have no meat in them.
I had sent him a mail as below that will clarify what the real fact are:
From: Hussain Khan, Tokyo
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 9:30 PM
To: William D…….
Cc: 'Earl White'
Subject: (Revised) My Personal assessment of the situation
Hello Williams,
I have been receiving George emails on other matters, but nothing regarding you so far.
Your bankers inspected ISIN No. of Barclays and you were mailing daily to George to give his Bank coordinates as you were ready to send MT799 Blockfunds to him at that stage.
At that stage you knew what was the Verbiage required by George. You and your banker had assured him that you will send MT799 Blockfunds of his Verbiage
He delayed to send you DOA for ………..Airlines.
After getting the Contract, your banker suddenly changed their position and you started smelling his Oil business in his Verbiage, which was the same as before, when you had asked his bank coordinates after confirming Barclays ISIN No.
You go to any Provider in the world and no one will send you Pre-Advice or MT760 unless you send them your ICBPO or Blockfunds mT799.
Even now the situation can be saved, if you send MT799 Blockfunds of his Verbiage for ………… Airlines, which you and your bankers were eager to send after confirming the ISIN No. in the beginning.
If he uses it for Oil business and does not send you MT760, as you suspect, you can get him arrested, as you have already warned him.
YOU CANNOT BLAME HIM FOR NON-PERFORMANCE WITHOUT SENDING HIM ANY ICBPO OR BLOCKFUNDS MT799.
IN HIS CONTRACT, HE HAS NOT COMMITTED TO PROVIDE BARCLAYS RWA. HE PROMISED ON SKYPE, ……….
THIS SKYPE PROMISE IS NOT PART OF HIS CONTRACT TO YOUR INFINITY Company NOR TO …………. AIRLINES. IT IS NO PROOF OF HIS NON-PERFORMANCE.
RATHER YOUR NON-PERFORMANCE OF NOT SENDING ANY COLLATERAL OF ICBPO OR MT799 IS MORE ASTOUDING THAN HIS REFUSAL TO EXECUTE A SKYPE PROMISE.
Regards,
Hussain Khan, M. A., Tokyo
Hussain Khan, Tokyo
Tokyo,#4REBUTTAL Owner of company
Tue, November 05, 2013
I was not bothering to issue a rebuttal of this report but I received a link of this report from a recent client:
----------Quote========================================
We have found an article while surfing the net.
Please visit this link and advise us accordingly.
--------------------------UNQUOTE-----------------------------------------
To satisfy my clients who come across this Report I am issuing the following rebuttal of these false allegations made against me, against Earl White and against George.
I know about this story. William D…. is a Vice President of ……..Airlines
He applied for a 500M BG through me. It was going to be issued on Monday that he started making accusations against me, against Earl White and against George on Saturday and Sunday, just one or 2 days before he was to get papers from us.
George got angry on these allegations that he is a scam artist and etc. and naturally refused to send him RWA enabling him to issue ICBPO.
William D…got angry on a report from an Ashraf Deal in the past, about which I also know nothing.
He has accused me and Earl White also. But there is no definite accusation as to what harm have we done to him?
Even against George ………he has no definite accusation as to what harm he did to William D….., except that he refused to issue him RWA.
However, in all his accusations, you will not find any definite matter that we have harmed him except that George refused to deal with him.
He did not inform what scam George did with him? George is there and has not disappeared from that address. All his accusations have no meat in them.
I had sent him a mail as below that will clarify what the real facts are:
From: Hussain Khan, Tokyo
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 9:30 PM
To: William D…….
Cc: 'Earl White'
Subject: (Revised) My Personal assessment of the situation
Hello Williams,
I have been receiving George emails on other matters, but nothing regarding you so far.
Your bankers inspected ISIN No. of Barclays and you were mailing daily to George to give his Bank coordinates as you were ready to send MT799 Blockfunds to him at that stage.
At that stage you knew what was the Verbiage required by George. You and your banker had assured him that you will send MT799 Blockfunds of his Verbiage
He delayed to send you DOA for ………..Airlines.
After getting the Contract, your banker suddenly changed their position and you started smelling his Oil business in his Verbiage, which was the same as before, when you had asked his bank coordinates after confirming Barclays ISIN No.
You go to any Provider in the world and no one will send you a Pre-Advice or MT760 unless you send them your ICBPO or Blockfunds mT799 as your Collateral.
Even now the situation can be saved, if you send MT799 Blockfunds of his Verbiage for ………… Airlines, which you and your bankers were eager to send after confirming the ISIN No. in the beginning.
If he uses it for Oil business and does not send you MT760, as you suspect, you can get him arrested, as you have already warned him in your emails to him directly.
YOU CANNOT BLAME HIM FOR NON-PERFORMANCE WITHOUT SENDING HIM ANY ICBPO OR BLOCKFUNDS MT799.
IN HIS CONTRACT, HE HAS NOT COMMITTED TO PROVIDE BARCLAYS RWA. HE PROMISED ON SKYPE, ……….
THIS SKYPE PROMISE IS NOT PART OF HIS CONTRACT TO YOUR INFINITY Company NOR TO …………. AIRLINES. IT IS NO PROOF OF HIS NON-PERFORMANCE.
RATHER YOUR NON-PERFORMANCE OF NOT SENDING ANY COLLATERAL OF ICBPO OR MT799 IS MORE ASTOUDING THAN HIS REFUSAL TO EXECUTE A SKYPE PROMISE.
Regards,
Hussain Khan, Tokyo
INVESTMENTGRP
Ontario,#5UPDATE Employee
Fri, September 06, 2013
FIRST OF ALL MR. WILLIAM D**** IS AN ANGRY, LYING, AND MISERABLE MAN.
WE HAVE NEVER TAKEN A DOLLAR FROM MR WILLIAM AND HIS 100 COMPANIES. MR. WILLIAM SAID THAT HIS BANK NEED ISIN NUMBER OF THE ASSETS BEFORE THEY CAN ISSUE POF/ICBPO, WHICH WE PROVIDED TO HIM AND HIS BANK VERIFIED, IN WHICH MR. WILLIAM D**** CONFIRMED. NOW INSTEADY OF PROCEEDING WITH THE ICBPO/POF, MR. D**** REQUEST RWA.
WE HAVE THE RWA DONE BUT WE NEVER SENT TO MR D**** BECAUSE OF THIS ATTITUDES AND UNPROFESSIONAL BEHAVIOUR. WE DECIDED NOT TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE TRANSACTION WITH MR. WILLIAM D****'S COMPANY LISTED BELOW.
1. COMPANY NAME : Mexicana Airlines
Address : 526 S Occidental Blvd Suite 264 Los Angeles, CA 90057
Represented by : William D****
2. COMPANY NAME : Infinity Holdings
Address : 526 S Occidental Blvd Suite 264 Los Angeles, CA 90057
Represented by : William D****
ANYHOW, MR. WILLIAM D**** IS FRUSTRATED AND ANGRY BECAUSE HE LOST HIS CREDIT LINE WITH HIS BANK. WHICH HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH US. BUT I GUESS IT IS BETTER TO POINT A FINGER THAN TO BLAME YOURSELF.
MR. WILLIAM D****, YOU AND I KNOWS THE TRUTH. WE HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH YOUR CREDIT LINE.
YOU ARE LOOKING FOR A FREE BANK INSTRUMENT, GOOD LUCK, YOU HAVE OUR BUSINESS ADDRESS, BRING YOU FBI AND LAWYERS AND A PROOF OF HOW WE SCAMMED YOU.
hurt client
Woodland Hills,#6Author of original report
Fri, September 06, 2013
George McGee the main scam behind the picture here is now haveing other people call and threaton to report to the ICC, he doesnt want people to see how much of a scam artist he really is
Dont believe anything from George McGee or any of his numberous company with the address of this in canada
1508 West Broadway, suite # 404 Vancouver BC V6J 1W8
SA INVESTMENT GROUP IS THE MAIN SCAM WITH GEORGE HE DOESNT SIGN THINGS HIM SELF TO MAKE OTHERS HELP HIM WITH HIS SCAMS
BEWARE OF THIS COMPANY