Cheryl
San Francisco,#2Author of original report
Mon, September 04, 2006
1. After I lost the 3 foot restraining order case, I filed a complaint against my attorney because he failed to prepare for the case. He believed he could have the case thrown out on a technicality due to it being a roommate situation that the Commissioner rejected. He also failed to get the Plaintiff's 5 eviction cases properly submitted for the court's record so the Commissioner threw them out. The attorney is disbarred. I wasn't the only one who complained. 2. When I went to the mediation meeting with the roommate (my attorney had asked I attend this during one of the hearings), a former police officer was part of the mediation team and tried to hit on me on the way home. He accompanied me out of the building to my bus stop where he rode with me. He came up close to my face, violating my physical space and acted like he wanted a date. Essentially, men set me up in this entire case because I was a single middle aged woman living with other women. They were trying to flush me out of my living situation where my privacy was completely violated (they behaved like rapists really). In the end I was hit up by a former police officer who wanted a date with me. He was wearing a leather jacket, cologne, he was all ready wanting to f**k me. I've been celibate for 20 years. These men are sick and exist on the level of criminals disguised in the legal system they manipulate to their advantage. I saw through their little operation as nothing more than police family mischief. They dishonored their badges, and are a disgrace to their profession.
Tim
Valparaiso,#3Consumer Comment
Tue, August 29, 2006
You stated above "The police . . . violated the Constitution by coming onto my property to search it without my permission or knowledge (recently the Supreme Court ruled they cannot do this without both tenant's permission)." If it was without your knowledge, then your issue doesn't fall within the ruling to which you refer. The case is Georgia v. Randolph, and its opinion holds that, when both tenants are PRESENT and one objects, the police cannot use the permissive tenant's consent to justify the search over the objection of the non-permissive tenant. But if you weren't there, then your roommate's consent was effective and allowed for the warrantless search. The case only applies when both tenants are present. That's not to say that the rest of your report isn't valid, however.
Cheryl
San Francisco,#4Author of original report
Mon, August 28, 2006
1. Ms. Pacific Heights was planning on using the police reports against me as evidence in a civil suit for damages. She claimed she couldn't collect anything because I had no assets, but it was because her attorney saw her case history. 2. Ms. Pacific Heights talked to the police as if I was the mental patient, said I was unemployed, and bringing drug dealers on the property. I was working long hours at Morrison & Foerester where I had even gotten a promotion on their night staff shift. The alleged drug dealer was a physical therapy student I was helping with his Internet research. 3. Ms. Pacific Heights would use my dark, H20 seaweed body mud material she found in the bathroom we were sharing (imagine that!), and smeared it on the toilet to make it look like I had harassed her with s**t on the toilet. She took a photo of it and the police wrote up a report for her. 4. Ms. Pacific Heights got the police to write up police reports on my alleged vandalism of my own leased property! Claimed shoe polish was in the bathtub, dirt was on the carpet I had actually paid $500 to have replaced from water damage. 5. Called the police when I had to move her kitchen table furniture to the front patio area when the carpet was being replaced. There was no where else to put it for the carpenters to work and bring in their materials. 6. Took photos of the front area that had previous tenants material/trash, accusing me of messing up the area with my trash. I only put the recycled bottle container there for convenience. Included it in her restraining order. 7. During the mediation meeting the court requested during the hearing, Ms. Pacific Heights said that Officer Ronald Gerke told her he would write down anything she wanted him to. 8. When I was waiting outside the hearing room for the first appearance for the 3 foot restraining order, I overheard Ms. Pacific Heights attorney speaking on the phone describing how "upset" Office Ronald Gerke had been over my alleged abuse of Ms. Pacific Heights. Ms. Pacific Heights had a court documented history of complaining about being abused by professional conselors, even admitting yelling at them for their lack of attention, and being suicidal around the holidays. More info: This was a woman who didn't pay rent for an entire year at the Mary Beth Inn - $800/mo rent prior to moving in with us. They let her live on the property, out of their tolerance, and yet this lady wanted to unlawfully evict me out of revenge for her past problems in life. Then, try to file a civil lawsuit to collect mone from me! Imagine how evil a person is to do something so deceptive - she felt justified due to feeling her African American heritage gave her a right. She referred to herself on the hearing stand as a "genius" and a professional business woman. Imagine a person so sick, to want to persecute people who were paying their rent on time, abusing police services all the while. Other people in real need are often complaining about the poor police service they get in San Francisco. Ronald Gerke said he had "all the time in the world" and would come back to my property in a threatening manner. That's when I filed a complaint against his little fish aquarium visit. I evaluating how this police department behaved, I concluded they were being overly helpful to Ms. Pacific Heights due to my initial complaint about their false report there was a "welt" on this woman's face. There was no medical evidence whatsoever. The police lied and I had a right to complain. They were coming over to harass me due to my initial complaint.