Anonymous
Hoboken,#2UPDATE EX-employee responds
Sun, September 15, 2013
This is in response to the post which is not based on any facts, but pure opnion that has obviously been tainted by Mr. Pierce and his team. This person has no idea what he is talking about.
First, both of these ladies have no interest in destroying anyone, that is childish, unprofessional and a waste of time.
Also, the judgement that he is claiming he won, he did NOT win, the case was thrown out and nothing awarded (but notice he does not post anything about that).
Nothing was proven in court (as he claims), it was won by default due to lack of filing on her part, but then thrown out.
They were married and worked in the business together, no money was stolen. First, you cant steal from yourself lol.
His business and his life is falling apart and he needs a scapegoat to blame, that is his pattern.
Take some time to look into his background - criminal record pages and pages long. So many enemies its outrageous. Interview any of his ex-employees, they all hate him. Business partners no longer want to do business with him. He is blacklisted on speaking stages and the list
goes on.
On the other hand, the ladies are well respected without any problems, the only person that has a problem with them is him.
This is a divorce gone bad. She left him when he was on a vacation with a mistress (which was one of his students). When a man like him loses control (it was an abusive relationship), he retaliates. He always has to be the one in control and with the upper hand. Women that have been
in abusive relationships, will be able to relate to this, because it is stereotypical behavior.
The ladies in question do not have any interest in what Mr. Pierce is doing and have no interest in destroying Mr. Pierce or his business activities, what he is doing is not of their concern.
Mr. Pierce posted that he won a judgement and it was "proved in a court of law", which is a false statement, nothing was proved in a court of law and
Mr. Pierce did not win any money. Mr. Pierce was awarded based on a default judgement which was thrown out.
Regarding the statement that she went to facebook "running her mouth" is completely ridiculous. She has not made public statements regarding these matters because it is not a public issue and it is extremely unprofessional. She simply tried to clarify in as simple terms as possible, that Mr.Pierce is boasting about winning a judgement based on default, not based on facts, and the judgement was overturned (which Mr. Pierce has
failed to acknowledge publicly). In fact, Mr. Pierce has filed several lawsuits and lost or did not show up to all of them.
Mr.Pierce has hired and fired over 30 employees in a 8 month time frame, hence he has a lot of enemies. No employee needs to be paid to state the truth, although Mr. Pierce has been known to pay employees to say whatever he wanted.
In addition, this is in fact a divorce gone bad, she nor her family did not scam anyone or anything. Her business and her family have an outstanding reputation. Mr.Pierce on the other hand does not, simply do some research and you can see bankruptcies, judgements, civil suits, forgery, bad checks and more.
I suggest the person that wrote this due their due diligence and don't let Mr. Pierce influence and cloud your judgement.
Also, Mr. Pierce was not "dealing with" anything but trying to find someone to blame for his inability in running a business.
Soapboxmom
Garland,#3General Comment
Thu, February 28, 2013
07/22/2012
Amended Judgment
07/23/2012
Mailed def judgment letter to Alicia Lyttle and Monetized Marketing
07/27/2012
Returned Mail Undeliverable
08/01/2012
Returned Mail Undeliverable to Monetized Marketing LLC
08/03/2012
Request for Copies $1.00 / pg
08/06/2012
Original Answer
08/06/2012
Original Answer Special Appearance, and Subject Thereto, Original Answer
08/13/2012
Motion - New Trial - Civil $40.00
Defendant Alicia Lyttle's Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial, and, Subject to Special Appearance, Defendant Monetized Marketing, LLC's Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial
08/17/2012
Correspondence
09/21/2012
Plaintiff's Response to Defs Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial
09/26/2012
Hearing Special Appearance, Motion to Vacate, Motion New Trial
9:00 AM
09/26/2012
General Docket Entry
Special Appearance/Motion to Vacate Default Judgment. Rulings made on the record. OTBFC.
Roach, John R., Jr.
09/26/2012
Order
01/28/2013
Notice of Nonsuit
02/05/2013
Order on Nonsuit
02/20/2013
Order Granting New Trial REOPEN - OCA
Order Granting Defendant Alicia Lyttle's Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial, and, Subject to Special Appearance, Defendant Monetized Marketing, LLC's Motion to Vacate Interlocutory Default Judgment and Motion for New Trial