In October 2015, I entered into a financial contract for investment of funds some USD$25,000.00 along with an assocaite for the same amount. This was to be invested by Andre Vorster and Martin Bekkers for a financial return on a weekly basis for 40 calender weeks.
No monies have been forth coming and only excuses have been given from traders being invloved in car accidents complete with photos of a Mercedes Benz Motor vehicle that did not hsow much dmage to A gentleman laying in hspital bed supposedly fighting for life.
To the production of court documents showing tha properties hase been ceased by the sheriff of the Supreme Court in Pretoria and these properties were to be liquidated to repay funds, including in all of this is a supposed unidentified bridging financier who is supposedly releasing funds to the investing clients until liquidation of the assets can be achieved. No Names have been given for the this paymaster who is supposedly to contact us all within the next week, which has been the story for the past 4 months, and no contact has been made at all ,
Threats of legal action reporting to Fraud Department for investigation and Interpol for wire fraud all fall on deaf ears .
This Person Vorster has numerous reports of fraud and scamming and proported lies all over the internet and seems to walk away each and every time. He maintains he has legal qualifications and a Dotorate but the Doctorateclaim ha sbene refuted as he cannot prove where it came from.
This Company Europlaw has supposedly beautiful ffice son the UK but on a recent visit I investigated and found them to be serviced offices only used when necessary and the actual company was registered to a room over a store in a unsavory suburb of London.
These 2 men have committed wire fraud under premise of return for investment and need to be reported and thoroughly investigated I have legally binding contracts and the refuse to honour them .
MARIA
New South Wales,#2Author of original report
Tue, September 01, 2020
The response to this complaint made by Vorster and Bekkers is absolute lies they have supplied copies of court papers however NO FUNDS HAVE been received by any clients and in fact Vorster has now changed his name and refuses to respond to any communications . He obviously has serious issues hiding his own actions, if these funds were in escrow where are they now.
MARIA
New South Wales,#3Author of original report
Mon, October 15, 2018
Well having read the rebuttal from Mr Vorster, it is nice to say that 3 years after the inital investment no one has received one penny in compensation or repayment lots of emails making promises and giving dates of funds to be paid down to no named paymasters and so called correspondents from Hong Kong with funds to be drawn down than reverted to europe.
All Hot air cloak and hiding on Mr Vorsters part to give the impression he is actually going to pay.
These funds will never be recovered and Files are now being looked at by Interpol .
Also interesting fact to note that on Mr Vorsters LinkedIn profie he has removed any mention of EuropeLaw Group, Wonder why ????.
MARIA
New South Wales,#4Author of original report
Thu, March 29, 2018
I am in receipt of the rebuttal that has been filed by Andre Vorster in response to my original filing, I am also aware that he also filed several documents attached to his rebuttal, BUT HE FAILED TO FILE THE ORIGINAL CONTRACTS BETWEEN ALL PARTIES.
WHY!!!!.
Because the contracts would clearly indicate tha he is at fault and his contracts have no mention of James Smith /Sharespace,
The said contracts also contain a clause 5.5 that is extremely clear in the fact that it is non performace penalty clause WHICH HE IS avoiding, and refuses to acknowledge that it needs to be honoured .
the said clause.
5.5 Non Performance / Penalty Clause: Party B hereby confirms with full corporate responsibility that Party B has a Non Performance and a Penalty Clause of 1% (One Percent) of the total face value of the financial instrument in place with both the Service Provider (Issuing the Financial Instrument) and the Monetizer in the event the Service Provider does not issue the financial instrument or the Monetizer does not monetize the financial instrument after the Swift MT799 / MT760 is verified and confirmed by the funding receiving bank. The Service Provider guarantees to Party B to pay the transmission fees (less expenses) in the event the Service Provider does not issue the Swift MT799 or the MT760 whatsoever. The legal fees is non refundable. Party B will reimburse the transmission fees (less expenses) to Party A on receipt of the funds paid by the Service Provider. Party B will provide the counter signed Deed of Agreement to Europlaw Group Incorporated, which Europlaw Group Incorporated can confirm in writing to Party A that the said Non Performance / Penalty Clause is enforceable between Party B and the appointed service providers.
He also fails to acknowledge the request for his Professional Indemnity Insurance information as it is now clear that will be the only recourse to retrieving the funds in any way owed ,
TO DATE ALL WE HAVE RECEIVED IS THE INFORMATION THAT A PAYMASTER HAS BEEN APPOINTED BY THE BRIDGING FINANCIER AND WE HAVE NOW BEEN WAITING THREE (3) MONTHS FOR HIM TO MAKE CONTACT,
Again this is just another crock of excuses offered by Vorster in an attempt to make himself and his company look good.
Ambrizo Holdings (Pty) Ltd
Pretoria,#5REBUTTAL Owner of company
Thu, March 22, 2018
Our offices have been very focused on working with the justice system helping to resolve this issue in support of Ms. Ferretti and Ambrizo Holdings (Pty) Ltd.
We wish to officially update this report by factual events -
Ambrizo Holdings (Pty) Ltd entered into a main Funding Investment Agreement with Mr. Rudolph Albertus James Smith of Sharespace (Pty) Ltd situated in Springs, South Africa. Ms. Maria Ferretti approached Ambrizo Holdings to determine if they could possibly participate in a project funding opportunity and thereafter Ms. Ferretti entered into a Project Funding Agreement with Ambrizo Holdings.
Ms. Ferretti then further entered into an Escrow Appointment Agreement with Europlaw, which Europlaw was only appointed as the Paymaster for this specific transaction. However, after various promises and commitments made by Mr. Rudolph Albertus James Smith of Sharespace (Pty) Ltd due to non-performance, Ambrizo Holdings placed Mr. Rudolph Albertus James Smith of Sharespace (Pty) Ltd on final terms.
Both Ambrizo Holdings and Sharespace entered into various negotiations and both parties have agreed to enter into a final Settlement Agreement trying to resolve the matter on an amicable manner. Once again Mr. Rudolph Albertus James Smith of Sharespace (Pty) Ltd could not comply with the stipulated terms and conditions as agreed to in the counter signed Settlement Agreement.
After non-performance of the Settlement Agreement, Ambrizo Holdingsissued a Combined Summons against both Mr Rudolph Albertus James Smith and Sharespace (Pty) Ltd as the two respondents with case number: 75810/2016 on the 17th September 2016 in the High Court of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa. As a result, Ambrizo Holdingsobtained a Default Judgement issued by the High Court of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa against both Mr Rudolph Albertus James Smith and Sharespace (Pty) Ltd on the 16 February 2017.
Ambrizo Holdings then obtained a Warrant of Execution Order issued by the High Court of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa against both Mr Rudolph Albertus James Smith and Sharespace (Pty) Ltd on the 17th May 2017. We have lodged criminal charges against Mr Rudolph Albertus James Smith during November 2017 at the South African Police Services and we are being informed that the State is not proceeding with any criminal charges against Mr Rudolph Albertus James Smith.
On March 19, we have emailed all applicable court papers issued by the South African High Court of South Africa to both the Legal Department of Ripoff Report and to the complainant herein to bring clear attention to this dispute. Both Ambrizo Holdings and our clients are victims from this transaction that have and continue to suffer as the result of the malicious actions and misrepresentations made by Mr. Rudolph Albertus James Smith and his service providers.
It is important to acknowledge that we have worked closely with the judicial system transparently in order to make every attempt to protect our clients via the High Court of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa, let there be no doubt we had no wrong doing on this matter and we are respectfully organizing a meeting with our clients to discuss the situation and bring these matters to a satisfactory conclusion.