Christine
The High Desert,#2Consumer Suggestion
Fri, June 25, 2004
So, what's the point of posting it? I guess you're employed by the Capital One damage control department. Lisa, of course they have broken the law. If you'd like to see how someone got a $1.5 million dollar verdict AND collected from Trans Union in 2003 for deleting an account a few days late from the credit report, check out the scanned filings at [DELETED] That buys a few trucks. And as always, there's more to the story. But amazingly, the jury based the verdict on only ONE claim, the deletion of an account a few days late. It's not easy to get those verdicts and it depends on your documentation and how good your lawyer is. Finding a competent lawyer is the tough part, try NACA.net, and get some opinions from lawyers in your state (it's state law.) I wouldn't settle for less than $50K - to me, after the attorney got paid. If you can document your grandmother's health problems, maybe a lot more. I hope she is better now.
Tim
Valparaiso,#3Consumer Comment
Tue, May 18, 2004
The staments below should not be construed as competent legal advice. Right off the bat we can dismiss your "new car every year for life" and "very large lawsuit" against Capital One. What you have here is a contract issue, not an injury ("Tort") issue. As far as the law is concerned, your losses are purely economic, and the most you are entitled to is compensation for those losses (which do NOT include any hardships you may have faced as an indirect result of this fiasco). Even if you did have a case in tort the acts of Capital One would have to be intentional, rather than merely negligent, for you to recover anything beyond your actual losses. Foreseeable damages are recoverable in negligence actions, but I highly doubt that any of your extraneous issues would fall within that category. The long and short of it is that if you are entitled to anything it is the actual money that you are out (including damage to the vehicle). I am neither entiltled nor qualified to make legal guaruntees, but I will all but guaruntee you that you will never, ever, see any compensation for the physical and emotional harms you claim to have suffered because of this situation. You throw around the phrase "broke the law" quite a bit. If you were to hire a lawyer in this matter I think that you would find that "against the law" is much less cut-and-dry than you think. Don't ever assume that what your friends tell you, or what you find out online, is an accurate statement of the law. The law is vastly complex and extremely misunderstood. For example, the fifteen day redemption period may start to run when your car becomes eligible for repossession, as opposed to when it is physically repossessed. That statement is purely hypothetical, but shows how what seems to be a simple rule of law can actually be quite complex. No layman should assume that he or she knows what the law is based on nothing more than word of mouth or internet research. All in all, you may have a good case, but it will probably be limited to your direct economic damages. You may wish to consult an attorney, but I wouldn't get your hopes up too high.