Steve
Cary,#2Consumer Comment
Sat, September 09, 2006
Why would you call Charter's Corporate office about being fired from the contract company??
Cable
Raleigh,#3UPDATE EX-employee responds
Fri, September 08, 2006
I read a response by someone in St. Louis Mo. where they were forced to leave Charter Communications for not helping them report false subscriber numbers to the SEC. Manipulation of subscriber numbers through inaccurate reporting of disconnects causes an artifical inflation of the active customer count. This increases the stock value of the company and this type of falsification is one of the things that got Charter Communications in trouble for with the SEC to begin with. Many former Charters upper management were prosecuted and fined by the SEC. I too am an X-employee. Even after the troubles with the SEC and the initiation of the Sarbanes Oxley Act (SOX), I have witnessed that Charter still continued to fudge numbers. I know this first hand. As a former manager, I was told to comply with Charter's directive which was to manipulate subscriber counts through deliberate falsification techniques. They also chose to be creative with capital labor reporting which is a whole other story that I could explain if asked to do so. I chose not to comply with these acts and was verbally reprimanded and then black-balled. When I followed the Sarbanes-Oxley procedure and reported the situation to an "internal" ethics committee, it got worse. I was later discharged without prior warning for something that I was given permission by my Manager and a former HR Manaager to do. It was an obvious targeting. Neither the Employment Commission or the EEOC can help in a case like this in NC which is a "right to work" state, but I did find out that terminating an employee for being a whistleblower is not allowed under protection of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. OSHA, believe it or not handles whistleblower retalliation but it appears to be a slow process. Anyway, I'd be interested in hearing back from the other former Charter employee that got the boot for refusing to falsify numbers. Maybe we can compare notes and help each other out.
Michael
St. Louis,#4UPDATE EX-employee responds
Fri, May 19, 2006
The guy who is the ex-employee of Charter is correct in his thoughts on Charter. I too am an ex-employee of Charter. I worked there for over 14 years before I was forced to leave. I refused to cooperate with Charter's policies for reporting the actual number of disconnected customer. They wanted us to lie about the numbers and when I did refuse, I was told to either comply or I was fired. Needless to say, that was my last day of employment after 14 years of employment. I have also seen first hand how they over charge customers and hope that they do not complain. If the customer complain it would take months to fix Charter's mistakes.
Troy
Muncie,#5Consumer Suggestion
Sat, February 04, 2006
and I have been around a while although I have never worked for Charter, it sounds like you may have streched the truth alittle on your story, or maybe charter fired you and you are bitter about it , but on the other hand I do not know you, so what do I know. Well I do know that your friend that was on sick leave and is now not going to be able to come back to work should have to start paying for their service, because the service is only free as long as you work for them. Plus , YES the mayor does get free cable because I'm sure he over see's the cable commision in your city, and free cable for the mayor , city hall, and all of the local schools and government offices is usually a free service, because the city runs the commision. Now,I do not understand? if all of this really happened to you why didn't you sue anyone or file any harrasment charges? It just dosent make any sence if I where to be treated like you said you were, my story would have been all over the News. Last of all even if the sales Rep in the call center did add services to the persons order after they got off the phone with them. When the Installer went out to complete the order and the customer told him all they ordered was the basic cable service then he would of been able to just leave them with basic cable and not put in the additional services, and inturn the sales Rep wouldn't get any commision for services that were not on that persons acct. It is for these reasons that I feel you may have streched the truth alittle , I'm not tring to make anyone mad I'm just tring to make sence out of the story. THANKS.