I was hired to produce tax returns in connection with a motor vehicle claim
CHRISTOPHER J FEIN filed against The BLANK Insurance
Company as well as to get him compliant with
This office was paid $20,000 for 105 hours in time spent on producing tax
returns going back 10 years. It had nothing to do with his ability to obtain a
refund, which he is not eligible for anyway. His records were deplorable and we
refused to give him deductions that he could not prove. His total fee was close
to $37,400 but we never billed him for the total amount because we were
supposed to get paid after he settled his case.
The IRS recently contacted CHRISTOPHER J FEIN ESQ. because he was delinquent on
the third payment plan we set him up on. He sent me an email trying to extort
enough money to pay off the IRS in May 2009. By agreement CHRISTOPHER J
FEIN he was going to stop his extortionate campaign and I would not sue him for
defamation, libel, fraud, among other things. We agreed to this
immediately after I posted my prior rebuttal.
I have been in touch with the Board of Bar Overseers for an ethics opinion on
how to handle this fraud. I have also been in touch with people friendly with
CHRISTOPHER J FEIN to discuss this matter and it appears CHRISTOPHER FEIN has PROBLEMS
that go beyond his need to EXTORT. If this post is not taken down I will call the insurance company's
attorney and let them know about the real CHRISTOPHER FEIN, his history of DRUG ABUSE, FRAUD and other facts that
will undoubtedly be useful in their defense of his motor vehicle claim.
This will probably be the only way to get CHRISTOPHER J FEIN ESQ. to appreciate
the significance of his criminal conduct. He is a FRAUD and a LIAR and I can
prove that he is trying to EXTORT money from my office.
Again, the Rip Off Report is allowing a crime to be perpetrated on me and my
family and they have shown a complete disregard for the truth. On May 29, 2009
CHRISTOPHER J FEIN own attorney demanded that they take down this blog and they
have done nothing to comply with this request. Instead, they sent him a
standard response that said "true or false, right or wrong" they
wanted it to be posted on their site.
OFFICE OF THE BAR COUNSEL
BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS OF THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT
Street
(617) 728-8750
Fax: (617) 482-2992
CONSTANCE V. VECCUJONE
RAJ COUNSEL
PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL
Mr. Ronald Blank
Revere Beach Parkway
No. 120
RE: BBO File No. B3-09-0051 (Christopher J. Fein Esg. Dear Mr. Blank:
The Board of Bar Overseers has determined that the conduct of Attorney Christopher Joseph Fein in the above-entitled matter constituted professional misconduct in violation of Supreme Judicial Court Rule 3:07, 1.6(a). Copies of these rules are enclosed for your information
In accordance with the Boards
decision, Attorney Fein received an Admonition effective
You are further informed that
Bar Counsel and the Board are required to keep this matter confidential in
accordance with Section 20 of Rule 4:01 of the Supreme Judicial Court of the
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Very truly yours,
Robert I. Warner
Assistant Bar Counsel
MW/jr
Enclosure