;
  • Report:  #175829

Complaint Review: Cricket Communications - San Diego California

Reported By:
- Toledo, Ohio,
Submitted:
Updated:

Cricket Communications
10307 Pacific Center Court San Diego, 92121 California, U.S.A.
Web:
N/A
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good? What's this?
I have been a customer of Cricket since 2002. I have been satisfied with their services up to this day.

On February 10, 2006, I made a payment on my credit card to my boyfriend's phone account. This payment was made online; I never had any problems before by paying online. The payment was not authorized online, so in turn I called Cricket Communications to make a payment. The representative authorized the payment and it was approved. Unfortunately, although the internet transaction was declined, the internet transaction was approved, and I was charged twice. My online bank statement confirmed this, I also called a bank representative who also confirmed that I was being charged twice.

Immediately, I called Cricket Communications and a representative informed me that nothing could be done. I then called my banking institution, who then stated that the second payment could be deauthorized. The next morning, I called Cricket Communications, who, over the course of talking to two supervisors and four representatives, offered me several solutions: They will doing nothing; no refund could be issued to me but to my boyfriend as a credit because I am not authorized as a user on his account; I can be issued the money within more than seven days but no non-sufficient funds fees can be refunded; etc. I am not satisfied with any of the solutions offered to me. A representative actually told me that my money can be taken, however, if a discrepancy occurs such as the one discussed, Cricket will not do anything to solve the problem.

I am very dissatisfied with the outcome of this scenario. The situation is not my fault. I am going switching phone carriers. The rude representatives, the unwillingness to come to a satisfying solution and resistance to help have forced me to come to this conclusion. Never before has this problem occured; I am not assured that this problem will not happen again.

Ashley

Toledo, Ohio
U.S.A.


6 Updates & Rebuttals

M

Winston-Salem,
North Carolina,
U.S.A.
I'm glad this worked out for you....

#2UPDATE EX-employee responds

Sat, February 18, 2006

I'm glad that you got the result you wanted. See? Cricket's not as bad as you thought. All you need to do is see what's available to you for options, then go from there to decide what to do. Hope you like staying with Cricket... PS - look for up and coming new features from Cricket like more roaming capabilities. If Cricket service is available in more than one city in your state, you might get the ability to roam in the other cities without an added extra feature fee...shhhh...don't tell anyone....


M

Winston-Salem,
North Carolina,
U.S.A.
I'm glad this worked out for you....

#3UPDATE EX-employee responds

Sat, February 18, 2006

I'm glad that you got the result you wanted. See? Cricket's not as bad as you thought. All you need to do is see what's available to you for options, then go from there to decide what to do. Hope you like staying with Cricket... PS - look for up and coming new features from Cricket like more roaming capabilities. If Cricket service is available in more than one city in your state, you might get the ability to roam in the other cities without an added extra feature fee...shhhh...don't tell anyone....


M

Winston-Salem,
North Carolina,
U.S.A.
I'm glad this worked out for you....

#4UPDATE EX-employee responds

Sat, February 18, 2006

I'm glad that you got the result you wanted. See? Cricket's not as bad as you thought. All you need to do is see what's available to you for options, then go from there to decide what to do. Hope you like staying with Cricket... PS - look for up and coming new features from Cricket like more roaming capabilities. If Cricket service is available in more than one city in your state, you might get the ability to roam in the other cities without an added extra feature fee...shhhh...don't tell anyone....


M

Winston-Salem,
North Carolina,
U.S.A.
I'm glad this worked out for you....

#5UPDATE EX-employee responds

Sat, February 18, 2006

I'm glad that you got the result you wanted. See? Cricket's not as bad as you thought. All you need to do is see what's available to you for options, then go from there to decide what to do. Hope you like staying with Cricket... PS - look for up and coming new features from Cricket like more roaming capabilities. If Cricket service is available in more than one city in your state, you might get the ability to roam in the other cities without an added extra feature fee...shhhh...don't tell anyone....


Ashley

Toledo,
Ohio,
U.S.A.
Cricket gave an immediate refund!!

#6Author of original report

Wed, February 15, 2006

I am satisfied to report that Cricket issued me a refund; the process was supposed to take seven days to process, but it took less than two days to process and acquire a refund. I am happy that I received a better service from Cricket; I was dismayed before, now it's ok. I hope that I can continue business with Cricket Communications.


M

Winston-Salem,
North Carolina,
U.S.A.
I've seen the "double charge" before....

#7UPDATE EX-employee responds

Wed, February 15, 2006

I can understand where you're coming from. I have seen where people's credit cards were charged twice by mistake. What baffles me is that the online payment was not authorized, but was still charged to your credit/debit card. Usually, that kind of transaction can be refunded if it was in error. Did the screen actually say that the credit/debit card declined, or did it just not give you an authorization number? If the latter happened, the charge can still be made to your credit card even if you didn't see anything. As for the representative not seeing it when they took a payment, that was because payments on the website usually take a few hours to show up as posting to the account it's being used on. If you pay on someone else's account, there can be different "rules" because you're authorizing payment on an account that doesn't have your name on it. To request a refund from someone else's account to your credit card might be seen as a type of fraud (I'm not saying that you were trying to make a fraudulent charge), which is why those rules exist. I've seen many cases where "friends" pay for another's bill, then claim "fraudulent credit card charge", especially if the "friends" become "ex-friends". One way I have seen this resolved is by requesting a payment refund, especially when there has been an overpayment/double charge. Usually any insufficient funds fees are credited back as well, but ONLY with a copy of the bank statement showing the fees faxed to the corporate office. But remember again that those rules may change once you pay for someone else's account. The options that they gave you are correct. I can see that what you want to happen is that: 1) the 2nd payment is refunded, and 2) any insufficient funds fees are refunded. Again, the rules change once you pay on someone else's account. You are able to get a refund of the 2nd charge, but not of the insufficient funds. So it's not that Cricket will not do anything, but that you have to choose what to accept that has been offered to you regarding the situation. You did have at least those two options you mentioned...

Reports & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
Also a victim?
Repair Your Reputation!
//