- Report: #746222
Complaint Review: Dean isaacson - Malibu California
Reported By:
Bill Simmons -
Marina del rey, California, United States of America
Submitted:
Updated:
-
Author Not Confirmed
Why?
Dean isaacson
21563 pch malibu 90265 Malibu, 90265 California, United States of America
Phone:
310-567-8655
Web:
Categories:
Business Rating:
(0)
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good?
Dean isaacson | NOTICE: Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration Decision: A neutral and independent Arbitrator has determined that the following report contained one or more false statements of fact. The false statements have been redacted (((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration))). Further, the Arbitrator has determined that the following Report was not written by a former Customer. Didm Con man. ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). Longbeach ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)) Malibu, California
RIPOFF REPORT VIP ARBITRATION
SUMMARY OF ARBITRATOR DECISION
Dean Isaacson, Complainant
v.
Bill Simmons, Author of Ripoff Report # 746222
________________________________________________________________________
Complainant, Dean Isaacson (Complainant), has challenged the truthfulness of certain statements (each, a Statement) posted by Author Bill Simmons (the Author) on the Ripoff Report website at www.ripoffreport.com on June 28, 2011, as Ripoff Report No. 746222 (the Report) Further, Complainant is challenging the status of the Author. The Author contends he was ripped off by the Complainant following a presentation allegedly made by the Complainant concerning investing in an assisted living facility. The Complainant denies the allegations in the Report and further contends that the Author was never an investor in the assisted living development. In response to the Report Complainant submitted a Declaration, and a letter from his attorney to the email address provided by the Author which went unanswered. By submitting a Report and a Complaint on the Ripoff Report website, both the Complainant and the Author have agreed to submit the dispute to the Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration.
Each Statement challenged by the Complainant has been considered, together with any Witness Statements and Documents provided by the Complainant for determination of the truth or falsity of the Statement. The Author did not provided a response to the Complaint.
The Arbitrator was asked to decide whether the preponderance of the evidence submitted establishes that each Statement is true or that it is false. If the statement identified by the Complainant is determined to be an opinion, no determination will be made as to that particular Statement because an opinion cannot be determined to be true nor false.
The Arbitrator was further asked to decide whether the preponderance of the evidence submitted establishes whether the Author was, in fact, an investor in a business opportunity offered by Complainant. The Complainant denies that the Author was an investor in the LLC. The Complainant states that he does not know anyone by the name of Bill Simmons. The Author was given an opportunity to provide evidence to establish that he lost money by investing it in Complainants assisted living development but did not do so. Accordingly, the Arbitrator found that the Author did not invest money in Complainants assisted living development.
The Arbitrator determined that the statements in the challenged Report were false. Therefore, according to the VIP Arbitration Rules, those statements have been redacted.
Decided August 1st, 2012
Bruce E. Meyerson, Arbitrator
* A copy of the full Arbitrators Decision is available upon request. Please e-mail [email protected] with the name of the Complainant and Report number. ________________________________________________________________________
((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). He has others as well that he shows as a power point presentation. ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). They own bull couture I'n Thousand oaks. He starts up little businesses with your money. He is working On a coffee shop I'n bull couture . Look it up. ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)).
[email protected]
SUMMARY OF ARBITRATOR DECISION
Dean Isaacson, Complainant
v.
Bill Simmons, Author of Ripoff Report # 746222
________________________________________________________________________
Complainant, Dean Isaacson (Complainant), has challenged the truthfulness of certain statements (each, a Statement) posted by Author Bill Simmons (the Author) on the Ripoff Report website at www.ripoffreport.com on June 28, 2011, as Ripoff Report No. 746222 (the Report) Further, Complainant is challenging the status of the Author. The Author contends he was ripped off by the Complainant following a presentation allegedly made by the Complainant concerning investing in an assisted living facility. The Complainant denies the allegations in the Report and further contends that the Author was never an investor in the assisted living development. In response to the Report Complainant submitted a Declaration, and a letter from his attorney to the email address provided by the Author which went unanswered. By submitting a Report and a Complaint on the Ripoff Report website, both the Complainant and the Author have agreed to submit the dispute to the Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration.
Each Statement challenged by the Complainant has been considered, together with any Witness Statements and Documents provided by the Complainant for determination of the truth or falsity of the Statement. The Author did not provided a response to the Complaint.
The Arbitrator was asked to decide whether the preponderance of the evidence submitted establishes that each Statement is true or that it is false. If the statement identified by the Complainant is determined to be an opinion, no determination will be made as to that particular Statement because an opinion cannot be determined to be true nor false.
The Arbitrator was further asked to decide whether the preponderance of the evidence submitted establishes whether the Author was, in fact, an investor in a business opportunity offered by Complainant. The Complainant denies that the Author was an investor in the LLC. The Complainant states that he does not know anyone by the name of Bill Simmons. The Author was given an opportunity to provide evidence to establish that he lost money by investing it in Complainants assisted living development but did not do so. Accordingly, the Arbitrator found that the Author did not invest money in Complainants assisted living development.
The Arbitrator determined that the statements in the challenged Report were false. Therefore, according to the VIP Arbitration Rules, those statements have been redacted.
Decided August 1st, 2012
Bruce E. Meyerson, Arbitrator
* A copy of the full Arbitrators Decision is available upon request. Please e-mail [email protected] with the name of the Complainant and Report number. ________________________________________________________________________
((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). He has others as well that he shows as a power point presentation. ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). They own bull couture I'n Thousand oaks. He starts up little businesses with your money. He is working On a coffee shop I'n bull couture . Look it up. ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)).
[email protected]
3 Updates & Rebuttals
Bill Simmons
malibu,California,
USA
Dean isaacson the con man
#2Author of original report
Sun, April 15, 2012
I love how Dean isaacsons assistant wrote [email protected]
Dean Isaacson
California,United States of America
Response to Complaint In The Rip-Off Report
#3REBUTTAL Individual responds
Mon, October 03, 2011
I have read the complaint by "Josh Carver." I do not know any Josh Carver. He is not an investor in the Long Beach assisted care living development with which I am involved. There is no investor in any project with which I have been involved by that name. I have never done business with a "Josh Carver."
I suspect this complaint has been made by a former disgruntled employee using a fictitious name.
I have been in the real estate development business since 1984. I have been a partner or member in numerous companies that have developed real property in California. If my partners or co-members were dissatisfied with my performance I suspect there would be complaints on the internet. There are not. In fact, the complaint of "Mr. Carver" is the only complaint against me on the "Rip-Off Report." If you go to the link which states "Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Dean Isaacson" you will find there are none.
If "Mr. Carver" believed I had robbed him of his money I assume he would have filed a lawsuit against me. A review of the records of the Los Angeles Superior Court will evidence that neither "Mr. Carver" nor anyone else has commenced any litigation regarding the Long Beach Development.
On September 26, 2011 my attorney sent a letter to Mr. Carver at the e-mail address listed on his complaint and the same e-mail used and filed with Rip-Off. That letter demanded that Mr. Carver retract his defamatory complaint against me. The letter sent to Mr. Carver's e-mail address was returned as non-deliverable. Thus, it is apparent that not only is Mr. Carver fictitious but so is his e-mail address.
[email protected]
Dean Isaacson
California,United States of America
Response to Complaint In The Rip-Off Report
#4Consumer Suggestion
Mon, October 03, 2011
I have read the complaint by "Josh Carver." I do not know any Josh Carver. He is not an investor in the Long Beach assisted care living development with which I am involved. There is no investor in any project with which I have been involved by that name. I have never done business with a "Josh Carver." I suspect this complaint has been made by a former disgruntled employee using a fictitious name.
I have been in the real estate development business since 1984. I have been a partner or member in numerous companies that have developed real property in California. If my partners or co-members were dissatisfied with my performance I suspect there would be complaints on the internet. There are not. In fact, the complaint of "Mr. Carver" is the only complaint against me on the "Rip-Off Report." If you go to the link which states "Click Here to read other Ripoff Reports on Dean Isaacson" you will find there are none.
If "Mr. Carver" believed I had robbed him of his money I assume he would have filed a lawsuit against me. A review of the records of the Los Angeles Superior Court will evidence that neither "Mr. Carver" nor anyone else has commenced any litigation regarding the Long Beach Development.
On September 26, 2011 my attorney sent a letter to Mr. Carver at the e-mail address listed on his complaint and the same e-mail used and filed with Rip-Off. That letter demanded that Mr. Carver retract his defamatory complaint against me. The letter sent to Mr. Carver's e-mail address was returned as non-deliverable. Thus, it is apparent that not only is Mr. Carver fictitious but so is his e-mail address.
[email protected]
