- Report: #411812
Complaint Review: Doctor Tameira Hollander - Littleton Colorado
-
Author Confirmed
Why?
Doctor Tameira Hollander
9681 S. Dover Way Littleton, 80127 Colorado, U.S.A.
Phone:
303-730-3332
Web:
N/A
Categories:
Business Rating:
(0)
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good?
Doctor Tameira Hollander Obtained court order to shut my blog down through perjury Littleton Colorado
I'm looking for an attorney to represent me, as my main website and blog were ordered removed by the Arapahoe (Colorado) district court.
Dr. Tameira Hollander sued me because I had posted a LINK to John Bailey's website. He is the husband of her former patient Barbara Bailey and he claimed that Dr. Hollander almost killed his wife. To support his allegation, he had a number of webpages with extremely detailed information and documentation.
Mr. Bailey's website was so convincing, I posted the LINK at my site with my comment:
A great site and fantastic example of how everybody should DOCUMENT and PUBLICIZE their complaints!
The Baileys immediately deleted their website when they were served, but I refused to remove all references to Dr. Hollander. Dr. Hollander is apparently NOT capable of typing her own email address correctly and despite my requests for SPECIFIC allegedly libelous statements, she submitted none.
The allegations against me are entirely fabricated and despite my request for comments to Dr. Tameira Hollander's attorneys and my repeated requests to provide ANY documentation to substantiate their allegations, I have received NOTHING.
They are monitoring my NEW blog about the litigation and to date they have NOT submitted notice of any incorrect statement. Everything at my blog is ACCURATE.
I am posting all communications with Dr. Hollander's attorneys, Irving Johnson and Lauren E. Dorweiler with Pryor Johnson Carney Karr Nixon, P.C. in Greenwood Village, CO at the new litigation blog.
They agreed to stipulate to extend my time to respond to the complaint to 2/12/09 and I hope to find an attorney not only to get the TRO vacated, but to LITIGATE the ISSUES:
1) Dr. Tameira Hollander's PERJURY (she verified the FALSE allegations in the complaint under oath)
2) Their process server / Peeping Tom's trespassing on my property and TERRORIZING me. I decided to arm and defend myself against future intruders, but I still have nightmares and I'll probably have to move or spend at least $20,000 on security.
3) While I'm aware of the lawyers' "privilege" to lie (the litigation privilege), I sure would like to see some repercussions against attorney Irving Johnson for filing this harassment complaint, KNOWING that the allegations against me were false.
He wrote to me prior to serving me that he wanted me to remove Tameira Hollander's name from my sites. Posting someone's NAME is NOT libel and neither are my TRUE statements.
Essentially, he conspired with Dr. Hollander to attempt to threaten, harass and abuse me until I agree to rewrite history and delete all references to Dr. Hollander from my sites. Naming me in this lawsuit is pure malicious prosecution.
4) I also find it suspicious that the judge ordered the removal of my site without ANY evidence whatsoever.
If this judge did nothing wrong, the RipoffReport site could be ordered removed too. I think there's at minimum the appearance of impropriety and I wouldn't be surprised at all if the lawyer and the judge are friends.
If they aren't friends, WHY did the judge order my blog removed without any evidence of defamatory statements?
This order doesn't pass the smell test and I think they expected me to cave in after being served like the Baileys .
Of course their strategy backfired, as you will notice if you search the web for "Tameira Hollander."
If you want to send a message to judges, lawyers, doctors, scammers and incompetent professionals of all sorts, PLEASE link to this RipoffReport from your sites and repost it at other free speech and complaint sites.
I want to make this THE free speech case.
Christine
Kingman, Arizona
U.S.A.
Dr. Tameira Hollander sued me because I had posted a LINK to John Bailey's website. He is the husband of her former patient Barbara Bailey and he claimed that Dr. Hollander almost killed his wife. To support his allegation, he had a number of webpages with extremely detailed information and documentation.
Mr. Bailey's website was so convincing, I posted the LINK at my site with my comment:
A great site and fantastic example of how everybody should DOCUMENT and PUBLICIZE their complaints!
The Baileys immediately deleted their website when they were served, but I refused to remove all references to Dr. Hollander. Dr. Hollander is apparently NOT capable of typing her own email address correctly and despite my requests for SPECIFIC allegedly libelous statements, she submitted none.
The allegations against me are entirely fabricated and despite my request for comments to Dr. Tameira Hollander's attorneys and my repeated requests to provide ANY documentation to substantiate their allegations, I have received NOTHING.
They are monitoring my NEW blog about the litigation and to date they have NOT submitted notice of any incorrect statement. Everything at my blog is ACCURATE.
I am posting all communications with Dr. Hollander's attorneys, Irving Johnson and Lauren E. Dorweiler with Pryor Johnson Carney Karr Nixon, P.C. in Greenwood Village, CO at the new litigation blog.
They agreed to stipulate to extend my time to respond to the complaint to 2/12/09 and I hope to find an attorney not only to get the TRO vacated, but to LITIGATE the ISSUES:
1) Dr. Tameira Hollander's PERJURY (she verified the FALSE allegations in the complaint under oath)
2) Their process server / Peeping Tom's trespassing on my property and TERRORIZING me. I decided to arm and defend myself against future intruders, but I still have nightmares and I'll probably have to move or spend at least $20,000 on security.
3) While I'm aware of the lawyers' "privilege" to lie (the litigation privilege), I sure would like to see some repercussions against attorney Irving Johnson for filing this harassment complaint, KNOWING that the allegations against me were false.
He wrote to me prior to serving me that he wanted me to remove Tameira Hollander's name from my sites. Posting someone's NAME is NOT libel and neither are my TRUE statements.
Essentially, he conspired with Dr. Hollander to attempt to threaten, harass and abuse me until I agree to rewrite history and delete all references to Dr. Hollander from my sites. Naming me in this lawsuit is pure malicious prosecution.
4) I also find it suspicious that the judge ordered the removal of my site without ANY evidence whatsoever.
If this judge did nothing wrong, the RipoffReport site could be ordered removed too. I think there's at minimum the appearance of impropriety and I wouldn't be surprised at all if the lawyer and the judge are friends.
If they aren't friends, WHY did the judge order my blog removed without any evidence of defamatory statements?
This order doesn't pass the smell test and I think they expected me to cave in after being served like the Baileys .
Of course their strategy backfired, as you will notice if you search the web for "Tameira Hollander."
If you want to send a message to judges, lawyers, doctors, scammers and incompetent professionals of all sorts, PLEASE link to this RipoffReport from your sites and repost it at other free speech and complaint sites.
I want to make this THE free speech case.
Christine
Kingman, Arizona
U.S.A.
2 Updates & Rebuttals
Christine
Cottonwood,Arizona,
U.S.A.
Court ordered perjury allegation removed
#2Author of original report
Fri, December 11, 2009
Pursuant to the court's order, I mailed the order and this request to Ripoff Report:
Re: Court order requiring deletion of my Tameira Hollander perjury allegations.
To Whom It May Concern:
Judge Gerald Rafferty in the Colorado Arapahoe district court ruled that doctor Tameira Hollander did NOT commit perjury when she falsely accused me in her complaint and affidavit to have my website shut down.
Judge Rafferty also ordered me to make reasonable efforts to have my perjury allegations removed from this and other sites. Apparently I erred when I thought that it was perjury when you make entirely FALSE allegations under oath.
I'll appreciate your removal of this statement in my Ripoff Report [this URL]
The courts minute order is enclosed for your convenience.
Thank you, Christine Baker
--------------------------------------------------
Of course I will appeal this and other bizarre rulings in this case and I still don't have an attorney. Apparently the free speech organizations will not assist with legal help until this matter is in a higher court.
Christine
Christine
Cottonwood,Arizona,
U.S.A.
Corrupt court ordered the above posting removed
#3Consumer Comment
Wed, July 29, 2009
I couldn't figure out how to post an update, so I chose the rebuttal option.
Here is the court order:
ORDER RE: TEMPORARY
new
Submitted by ChristineBaker on Tue, 07/28/2009 - 23:30.
ORDER RE: TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
This Court, having reviewed Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order,
hereby finds that sufficient factual information has been provided to warrant the entry of
a temporary restraining order without Defendant having notice or an opportunity to be
heard. The Court orders as follows:
1. Christine Baker and any agent on her behalf shall immediately remove
http://doctor-tameira-hollander-litigation.info from the internet.
2. Christine Baker and any agent on her behalf shall refrain from posting or
publishing any other material containing a critical opinion or negative
reference to Dr. Tameira Hollander.
3. Christine Baker and any agent on her behalf shall immediately remove the
blogs and/or postings referencing Dr. Hollander from the following websites:
a.(((Redacted)))
b. (((Redacted)))
c. http://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/0/411/RipOff0411812.htm;
d. (((Redacted))); and
e. Any other website blogs and/or postings containing a negative
reference or critical opinion of Dr. Tameira Hollander.
4. This Court may impose sanctions for contempt upon failure to strictly adhere
to this Order.
5. This Order shall be in effect pending scheduling and hearing for a preliminary
injunction.
----------------------------------------------------------
I swear on anything you want that EVERYTHING I wrote about this case is TRUE.
Of course I wanted to comply with this court order, but I can't remove the post.
