Anonymous
Broadway,#2Author of original report
Fri, April 10, 2009
As an update to my previous report- Our newly adopted sweet kitty was laid to rest on March 25,just 3months and 3days since we adopted him. Yes, he was feLv positive ,and he also had FIP (feline infectious perionitis) which is almost more fatal than the feLv! He had hemmoraging and edema in his eyes and was beggining to develop fluid in his chest (result of the FIP). He refused to eat starting on 3/23 and retreated to underneath the couch, as a way of saying he only wanted a dark quiet place to slip away from his pain. I knew though, that he wouldn't slip away peacefully and made the dreadful decision to euthanize him. I know that was the best decision I could have made for him. I stopped in at CSA to notify Dr. Blease of the end result of our situation. I noticed that the cats' cages were labeled differently, a direct result of the mistake that led us to adopt a cat with feLv. My hopes were that the office changed their practices so this sort of thing wouldn't happen again. As far as the nasty staff member, she was still there although avoided me like the plague. Dr. Blease suggested that when we were ready to 'replace' the cat that we return to CSA and adopt a cat from them, 'a healthy one this time'. THat is still up for debate and discussion. YES, people make mistakes, it is part of this human condition. It is only a terrible thing if we do not learn from them! In 3 short months we spent a total of $630 in medical bills alone and even more importantly, we fell so deeply in love with this precious little kitten who taught us several lessons about ourselves, about humanity and about unconditional love. We still are unsure if our first cat contracted the feLv, she will be restested in another month. As for now, we're missing our precious sick little buddy...he will forever leave a hole in my heart.
Devilsadvocate4education*just My Opinions*
Las Vegas,#3Consumer Comment
Sun, March 01, 2009
I am sorry for you and your kitty's, but wanted to ask about the testing. First, did the cat have recent vaccines before the test (Vaccines make a huge difference and can effect test results) and second did you do an elisa test or a snap test, or both? The elisa is more accurate though more expensive, and there are some cats who will for some reason set off a positive (snap) leukemia test every once in awhile (once in every ten or so usually) even though they DO NOT have the disease which can usually be verified by an elisa test. The feline aids is even trickier. Any cat who has been vaccinated for the disease can test postitive from then on even if they DON'T have it. This becomes even more of an issue when all the vaccines given prior are unknown. There are alot of people who do not give these vaccines (among others) for cats who live indoors only with no exposure to outside cats (any newcomers are fully elisa tested before ever coming through the door) due to all the issues involved that arise with the administration of the vaccines. There are some specific breeds who shouldn't get certain vaccines EVER as well. Did your vet go over any of this with you? There are plenty of good articles about vaccinations online, we all need to do our research and come to our own decisions and discuss them with our vets and figure out what WE believe to be best for our pets. If you only did the snap test, please ask your vet about doing an elisa before any further tests are taken. *just my opinions*