Michael
Golden Beach,#2General Comment
Fri, August 21, 2015
In relation to the complaint concerning price changing of Dr. Glassman. I believe a patient without insurance has unreasonable expectations if the patient thinks a doctor is going to treat them all inclusive for 145.00. The doctor has to pay an outside lab to analyze the blood work and I don't know any docs that take blood for free? I also think a patient without insurance could be interpreted as a "medicaid" patient, as medicaid prior to Obama Care was the default insurance for individuals without insurance. I can easily see how Dr. Glassman could misunderstand. I also know most people over a vulnerable age are not crystal clear which insurance they have and until you run their social it is anyone's guess. Finally a patient seeking "pain medication" for a chronic condition could very well be drug seeking. If the individual making the complain felt it was unreasonable of the doctor to run a blood or urine panel, then I would venture to say the patient may have had unreasonable expectations. It is good practice to check the toxicity levels and blood analysis before ordering pain meds.
Is it really fare to bash Dr. Glassman given the opinion of a patient who has no realistic concept of what defines good medicine? Is it reasonable to expect a doctor to write a script for Pain Meds and the doc not know if the patient is an addict or what other dependency is in their blood stream? Is it fare to harm someone's reputation because either party may have misunderstood the questions? I believe that it is the patients responsibility to ask questions about additional fees. Going to see a doctor to evaluate a common flu or asking for a narcotic are entirely diferent.