JimboVegas
Henderson,#2UPDATE Employee
Mon, May 23, 2016
This report is certainly true with regard to the end game behavior of Vanlandingham. When he started losing money on a weekly basis, he engaged in the larcehous practices described that pertain to the consultants and clients. However, the collective work of the consultants is not accurately portrayed in this article and should be retracted.
I was a consultant for Gulf Pacific and had a very successful run with my clients. My engagements were prroperly detailed at the outset and modified as the client requested in the course of the engagements. The clients paid at the end of every week and continued on until the work was done. All of my clients turned in performance evaluations and letters of satisfaction for the work that was done. I have the documentation.
You may not want to hear this but all of my projects went well. I was able to assist the clients with their business needs in the agreed upon time and with results that not only satisfied them but either met or exceeded their results for profitability, operational improvement and financial controls. One thing that Gulf Pacific did very well - better, in fact, than the other companies out there - was identify potential clients who were viable candidates for work. What does that mean? Business owners who required either specific or general assistance with their business operations. Businesses had the potential for a return to or a substantial improvement in profitability of a scale that made the fees very worthwhile. Owners who were intellectually capable of understanding the consulting work presented to them and were prepared to make the changes.
When a business engages the services of a consultant does not possess all of these characteristics, the consulting exercise is doomed to failure. Moreover, owners often fail to recongnize this and take out their anger in places like this. It is true that some of the consultants simply did not have the skills or the experience needed to do this work and started to fail in the clients' eyes. I personally was sent in as the seconed guy to do the engagement and ultimately complete it. Gulf gave necessary financial credit to these clients and I was appropriately rewarded for the "saves".
Anyone who writes about Gulf, or any of the other companies for that matter, must acknowledge what I have written here. The internet has certainly given the industry the black eye it deserves but has inaccurately portrayed consultants as a class. I personally know other consultants who have the same batting average as mine and who were doing it for a lot longer than me. So, let me tell all the pundits who care to opine about Gulf Pacific what I told all of my clients regarding their work: if you can't perform a process in a defect free manner, in a way that is as profitable and satisfying as it can be, then get out of that part of the business.