Ramjet
Somewhere,#2Consumer Comment
Sat, March 10, 2012
You said: Customer ignorance or innocence should not be used as an excuse to rip people off.
This is absolutely true, however, the fact is that the majority of car dealers are sleazy outfits who take advantage of people whenever they can. Unfortunately you have to really do your homework, be aware of as many of their tricks as you can and actually EXPECT that you will be treated poorly. Even with all due diligence you can be blindsided with a new trick.
Most of us have been ripped off to some degree by a car dealer at some point in our lives and that's where most suggestions come from.
We have actually found an honest and straightforward car dealer (they do exist). They are consistent, do not play tricks with contracts or any of the other sleazy techniques. They get all our business and we recommend them to other people.
I have actually talked to car salesmen who have been disgusted with the techniques they were required to use. They needed a job and didn't stay in the industry any longer than they had to. They are VERY good sources of information.
coast
USA#3Consumer Comment
Sat, March 10, 2012
"I visited them in a few days when it did not arrive and demanded it, along with my brother."
Did they eventually return your brother?
Xander
League City,#4Author of original report
Sat, March 10, 2012
In a good faith business deal, customers are not expected to be educated in all the ways they can be cheated by a car dealer. Yes I did request my contract and was told it would be mailed to me. I visited them in a few days when it did not arrive and demanded it, along with my brother. I was then told the accounting dept closed at 4:00 so they could not give me a copy of my contract. I have spoken to someone else there, who told me that a copy of my contract could have been given to me at 4:00 not requiring the accounting dept to be open, however, it was also stated that the accounting dept does NOT close at 4:00. So there never has been a consistent statement told to me at Clear Lake Honda.
Had the car I traded in not been incapacitated, I would have walked out at the sale when a contract was not given to me at that time.
Customer ignorance or innocence should not be used as an excuse to rip people off.
And as for the 1.9 % interest that I would no longer be eligibile for? Were I to allow my car to be repossessed, I surely would not be shopping at Clear Lake Honda. Perhaps I will buy a second car from Toyota for a 0.9% interest rate and use my Honda as a trade-in.
Thanks for the warning!
coast
USA#5Consumer Comment
Sat, January 21, 2012
"When I signed the contract was taken and I was not given a copy."
Did you request or insist on receiving a copy? That was a major blunder on your part.
"Patrick (African American man), who sold me the car, had told me I could not decline the extended warranty"
That is illegal. If you had requested that statement in writing he would have withdrawn the demand.
"I am debating buying another car and letting that one be repossessed"
Not if you want to continue to qualify for a loan at 1.9%. (Excellent credit is nice, huh?)
"The other scam was that I would get free lifetime oil change"
Is that documented?
Good luck.