- Report: #448106
Complaint Review: Jeffery Crolene - Pool Success - Pool Inspector Henderson Justice - Henderson Nevada
-
Author Confirmed
Why?
Jeffery Crolene - Pool Success - Pool Inspector Henderson Justice
10624 S Eastern Ave Henderson, 89052 Nevada, U.S.A.
Phone:
702-642 3854
Web:
N/A
Categories:
Business Rating:
(0)
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good?
Jeffery Crolene - Pool Success - Pool Inspector Henderson Justice, Henderson Justice Court agrees that Jeffery Crolene and his Wife DBA Pool Success / Pool Inspectors are Liars and Thief's. Henderson Nevada
Henderson Justice Court agrees that Jeffery Crolene and his Wife DBA Pool Success / Pool Inspectors are Liars and Thief's.
On March 31 2009 the Henderson Justice Court awarded Jeffery Crolenes latest victim over $4000.00 in damages case # O8AH577. Jeffery Crolene and his wife who uses the Christine Marie, President alias in an attempt to fool their victims accepted $4000.00 from their latest victim to conduct a Due Diligence service for the victim who was purchasing a $500,000.00 Pool Route.
The Day the victim notified the Pool Broker, Charles Baird of Pool Route Sales AKA The Millionaire Pool Man that he had hired Jeffery Crolene, Charles Baird immediately cancelled the deal on the spot. Charles Baird stated he NEVER could conduct business with Jeffery Crolene under any circumstances. Charles went on to say he gets numerous phone calls about what thief this guy Jeffery Crolene is and had he no choice but to terminate the deal.
Once the victim learned about Mr. Crolenes horrible reputation and the deal was cancelled, the victim asked Jeffery Crolene for his money back but Jeffery refused. First Jeffery tried to say he did the due diligence he was paid to do. But when Charles Baird sent a letter to the victim to present to the court stating that no due diligence ever took place. Jeffery then changed his story to I'm still willing to do the due diligence therefore I'm keeping the money.
The Henderson Constable upon trying to serve Mr. Crolene learned that the office Mr. Crolene advertises with is nothing than a PoBox. The Constable went on line and learned that on the Pool Success website there is no phone number nor address. The Constable said that is a classic way scam artists set up their scams. That any legitimate business will always have address and phone number in their advertising. Luckily the Judge agreed that it was OK for the Constable to serve the Pobox. In fact ,Mr. Crolene showed the victim pictures of what Jeffery called his State of The Art Facility located near the Las Vegas strip as a show of Jeffery's success.
As it turns out, Mr. Crolene would rent a conference room in this building a couple times per year to conduct is so called boot camps, it was NOT Jeffery's state of the art facility. Jeffery went on by telling his victim about his entire staff and upon examination his entire staff is his wife, turns out Jeffery he has no staff. The City of Henderson weighed in and sent a letter to the Judge that said Mr. Crolene is NOT licensed to conduct any type of Management/Consulting business which made Jeffery's Pool Success agreement/ contract with the victim invalid and unlawful.
The victim was able to give the Judge numerous names of other Crolene alleged victims of the Pool Suckess scam. Including an email Mr. Crolene sent the victim that stated in no uncertain terms if you sue me, I will start up a website that will destroy your good name! this though Jeffery never used any of his victims' services. After the evidence continued to pile up against Mr. Crolene the Judge agreed with the victim and awarded him over $4000.00.
After the hearing the victim stated he didn't want to go to rip off report until he had the Judge agreeing I was in the right. The victim went on to say that everyone has been warned about Jeffery Crolene, his wife and their businesses. The same Jeffery Crolene who promises for a fee to make you wealthy through the Pool Service industry yet failed to make himself wealthy. He lives in an old condo in Henderson NV and a little Honda car. There is no state of the art facility, there is no wealth associated with Mr. Crolene only lies and deceit and the City of Henderson agrees. How can he make you wealthy when in fact he cannot make himself wealthy. I heard he is an ex-motivational speaker and he can talk like a pro. But if anyone still chooses to listen to him or conduct business with them you deserve what you get...
Charles
Lake arrowhead, California
U.S.A.
On March 31 2009 the Henderson Justice Court awarded Jeffery Crolenes latest victim over $4000.00 in damages case # O8AH577. Jeffery Crolene and his wife who uses the Christine Marie, President alias in an attempt to fool their victims accepted $4000.00 from their latest victim to conduct a Due Diligence service for the victim who was purchasing a $500,000.00 Pool Route.
The Day the victim notified the Pool Broker, Charles Baird of Pool Route Sales AKA The Millionaire Pool Man that he had hired Jeffery Crolene, Charles Baird immediately cancelled the deal on the spot. Charles Baird stated he NEVER could conduct business with Jeffery Crolene under any circumstances. Charles went on to say he gets numerous phone calls about what thief this guy Jeffery Crolene is and had he no choice but to terminate the deal.
Once the victim learned about Mr. Crolenes horrible reputation and the deal was cancelled, the victim asked Jeffery Crolene for his money back but Jeffery refused. First Jeffery tried to say he did the due diligence he was paid to do. But when Charles Baird sent a letter to the victim to present to the court stating that no due diligence ever took place. Jeffery then changed his story to I'm still willing to do the due diligence therefore I'm keeping the money.
The Henderson Constable upon trying to serve Mr. Crolene learned that the office Mr. Crolene advertises with is nothing than a PoBox. The Constable went on line and learned that on the Pool Success website there is no phone number nor address. The Constable said that is a classic way scam artists set up their scams. That any legitimate business will always have address and phone number in their advertising. Luckily the Judge agreed that it was OK for the Constable to serve the Pobox. In fact ,Mr. Crolene showed the victim pictures of what Jeffery called his State of The Art Facility located near the Las Vegas strip as a show of Jeffery's success.
As it turns out, Mr. Crolene would rent a conference room in this building a couple times per year to conduct is so called boot camps, it was NOT Jeffery's state of the art facility. Jeffery went on by telling his victim about his entire staff and upon examination his entire staff is his wife, turns out Jeffery he has no staff. The City of Henderson weighed in and sent a letter to the Judge that said Mr. Crolene is NOT licensed to conduct any type of Management/Consulting business which made Jeffery's Pool Success agreement/ contract with the victim invalid and unlawful.
The victim was able to give the Judge numerous names of other Crolene alleged victims of the Pool Suckess scam. Including an email Mr. Crolene sent the victim that stated in no uncertain terms if you sue me, I will start up a website that will destroy your good name! this though Jeffery never used any of his victims' services. After the evidence continued to pile up against Mr. Crolene the Judge agreed with the victim and awarded him over $4000.00.
After the hearing the victim stated he didn't want to go to rip off report until he had the Judge agreeing I was in the right. The victim went on to say that everyone has been warned about Jeffery Crolene, his wife and their businesses. The same Jeffery Crolene who promises for a fee to make you wealthy through the Pool Service industry yet failed to make himself wealthy. He lives in an old condo in Henderson NV and a little Honda car. There is no state of the art facility, there is no wealth associated with Mr. Crolene only lies and deceit and the City of Henderson agrees. How can he make you wealthy when in fact he cannot make himself wealthy. I heard he is an ex-motivational speaker and he can talk like a pro. But if anyone still chooses to listen to him or conduct business with them you deserve what you get...
Charles
Lake arrowhead, California
U.S.A.
2 Updates & Rebuttals
Jeffrey crolene
Henderson,Nevada,
U.S.A.
Inaccurate
#2REBUTTAL Owner of company
Fri, October 02, 2009
First off, this case has nothing to do with P00L Success's training
event, since Mr. Charles Partito did not ask, or pay to attend such
training. Partito was looking to purchase a pool route... nothing else.
Partito solicited the defendant. Example being is no where on P00L Success's website does it offer "due diligence" services.
Reading defendant's agreement, it clearly states "consultation services", which is what Partito actually requested. What exactly is due diligence?
Initially, the price was $2,500 for 60 days, whether Partito successfully
purchased a pool route or not. Partito offered to pay defendant $4,000 for no
time limit. Defendant agreed to the higher offer. If it were for "due diligence", why the need for "no time limit"?
Not only did defendant review the pool route from Baird, but defendant
has emails from Partito asking defendant to review pool routes in
California, Arizona, and Texas, which he did in every case and responded promptly in each case. Why is there such an attack on someone trying vigilantly to accommodate a client?
Partito fails to mention that over the course of six weeks, defendant
reviewed no less than five pool routes, from several brokers, including
Baird. It seemed as if Partito clearly was taking advantage, but defendant agreed to the terms and persevered.
The sole reason Partito cancelled his agreement was that he decided not
to buy ANY pool route from anyone. Nothing else. And defendant was not about to provide a 100% refund Partito demanded.
As far as court, Partito fails to mention he's referring to small
claims court. He wants you to believe it's some big criminal court case and he's the victor. Did not happen that way.
Partito fails to say the defendant lost the initial court case because he
was not present. Reason being defendant was never served properly in which the
judge agreed to re-hear the case, not on appeal, but because there was sufficient evidence there was a mistake in serving. He thus nullified
the initial ruling.
No scam as Partito implies. No judge having a buddy-buddy talk with defendant as he wants
you to think. Actually, nothing was said after roll call was taken. No
defendant, no case. Judgement automatically goes to plaintiff. Any one attending a small claim hearing knows this, and so does Partito. Seems someone is lying about the truth.
At the new hearing, defendant was awarded $1,000 out of the initial
$4,000. Judge said that defendant failed to include a cancellation
policy, but recognized the time and effort provided Partito. Also note,
Partito did not even get his court costs reimbursed.
All contracts from P00L Success, or defendant now include a
cancellation policy plus as an added bonus - a satisfaction guarantee
so people don't think postings such as these are valid. As far as
licensing, the judge found everything in order (other wise, why would
the judge award plaintiff $1,000? Because his licensing was valid.)
Partito simply is a cheap individual who makes immature choices, like
thinking he can operate a $500,000 pool service business. Partito
thinks he's entitled to all monies back because he changed his mind, no
discussion. The fact is, Partito doesn't want to pay for services
rendered because of his mistakes into rushing into things he shouldn't.
As far as the defendant is concerned, he saved Partito and his mother
$496,000 on making a big mistake. Defendant should have received a
reward, rather than been punished... but that's business.
Jeffrey crolene
Henderson,Nevada,
U.S.A.
Inaccurate
#3REBUTTAL Owner of company
Fri, October 02, 2009
First off, this case has nothing to do with P00L Success's training event, since Mr. Charles Partito did not ask, or pay to attend such training.
Rather it was Partito who solicited the defendant. Example being is no where on P00L Success's website does it offer "due diligence" services.
Defendant's agreement with Partito wasn't for "due diligence, rather for consultation services, also not mentioned on website.
Initially, the price was $2,500 for 60 days, whether Partito successfully
purchased a pool route or not. Partito offered to pay defendant $4,000 for no
time limit. Defendant agreed.
Not only did defendant review the pool route from Baird, but defendant has emails from Partito asking defendant to review pool routes in California, Arizona, and Texas, which he did in every case.
Over the course of six weeks, defendant reviewed no less than five pool routes, only one from pool route broker, Baird.
Partito states the contract was for due diligence for one pool route with one broker. Not true. Defendant was contacted by email for his advise no less than 22 times in six weeks, before defendant decided not to buy ANY pool route from anyone.
As far as court, Partito fails to mention he's referring to small claims court. He wants you to believe it's some big criminal court. And he fails to say the defendant lost the initial court case because he was not present. Reason being defendant was never served properly. The judge agreed to re-hear the case, but not on appeal since he nullified the initial ruling.
No scam. No judge having a buddy buddy talk with defendant as he wants you to think. Actually, nothing was said after roll call was taken. No defendant, no case. Judgement automatically goes to plaintiff.
At the new hearing, defendant was awarded $1,000 out of the intial $4,000. Judge said that defendant failed to include a cancellation policy, but recognized the time and effort provided Partito. Also note, Partito did not even get his court costs reimbursed.
All contracts from P00L Success, or defendant now include a cancellation policy plus as an added bonus - a satisfaction guarantee so people don't think postings such as these are valid. As far as licensing, the judge found everything in order (other wise, why would the judge award plaintiff $1,000? Because his licensing was valid.)
Partito simply is a cheap individual who makes immature choices, like thinking he can operate a $500,000 pool service business. Partito chnages his mind and thinks he's entitled to all monies back. The fact is, Partito doesn't want to pay for services rendered.
As far as the defendant is concerned, he saved Partito $496,000 on making a big mistake. Defendant should have received a reward, rather than been punished... but that's business.
