;
  • Report:  #285890

Complaint Review: Jim Morgan And Jan Windglows;bloodloveandlustspells.com - Driigs Idaho

Reported By:
- Pittsburg, Pennsylvania,
Submitted:
Updated:

Jim Morgan And Jan Windglows;bloodloveandlustspells.com
PO Box 712 Driigs, 83422 Idaho, U.S.A.
Phone:
208-6392224
Web:
N/A
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good? What's this?
Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows of bloodloveandlustspells.com and Dragonspells.com is committing TAX evasion phone: 208-639-2224

IRS - please add this to the Jim Morgan and Jan windglows file with other paperwork I have sent you. Furthermore, the names and emails below are associates of Jim Morgan and Jan Windglows. They are witness to their Fraudulent and criminal behavior.

Jim Morgan of bloodloveandlustspells.com and Dragonspells.com is committing TAX evasion

Mike Cahill - [email protected],

Kim Thrasher - [email protected]

Celeste Morgan - [email protected],

Matilda Somerfield - [email protected]

Scam Artist;Jim Morgan & Jan Windglows of bloodloveandlustspells.com,Dragonspells.com is committing TAX evasion phone: 208-639-2224 worst experience they stole money, did not provide merchandise ans breached confidentiality and called all my friends and loveres about spell requests...do not use these casters unless you want to lose your money

Honestperson

Pittsburg, Pennsylvania

U.S.A.


32 Updates & Rebuttals

PsychicEYE4GOD

Tampa,
Florida,
USA
WARNING: Cyber Stalker Jan Windglows is a SCAM! Witchcraft is a SCAM: Jan Windglows SCAMS Multiple People; DO NOT USE: Ripoff SCAM Fake Psychic Jan Windglows is a SCAM, Verified Serial Cyber STALKER

#2Consumer Comment

Wed, March 30, 2011

March 30, 2011 Hi. I am an American Citizen. I surf the
Internet daily. I am against Witchcraft and so is GOD;

I want to expose a Coven of Criminals operated by SERIAL Stalker and SCAM called Jan Windglows of Scam Site Blood Love and Lust Spells, PO Box 118, Bonners Ferry, Idaho,83805
Internet & phone Contact onl:y ph: 208-714-434. 

Witchcraft is a SCAM! Jan Windglows is a SCAM!

 
WARNING: Cyber Stalker Jan Windglows is a SCAM! Witchcraft
is a SCAM: Jan Windglows SCAMS Multiple People; DO NOT USE: Ripoff SCAM Fake
Psychic Jan Windglows is a SCAM, Verified Serial Cyber Predator and Criminal;
Jan Windglows Verified Cyber SCAM & Serial Stalker

 

As an American I have a right to my American Opinions. Witchcraft to me is a SCAM.
SPELLS to me are a SCAM. SCAMMERS Jan Windglows aka Janhett T. Windglows aka
Emchantress Jan 208, Jim Morgan aka James Morgan aka Dragon , and Mike Cahill
aka Stanley are all SCAMMERS! I have a right to many American opinions and as
long as I do not lie or post false Cyber ID Theft intending to do harm  then I am not committing any cyber crimes,

Cyber SCAM Jan Windglows. I believe anyone in the Spellcasting Business is a
complete SCAM. I believe anyone in the Witchcraft business is a complete SCAM,
like SCAM Jan Windglows of Scam Site Blood Love and Lust Spells. How do you
SCAM the SCAMMER?  Witchcraft is a SCAM.
Jan Windglows is a Scam.

 

SCAMMERS Jan Windglows, Jim Morgan and Mike Cahill all are
Con-Artist wanted by the POLICE!! I told Psychic in Seattle, about the worst
service I received from Blood Love and Lust Spells. I spoke with all 3 of these
character Jan Windglows, Jim Morgan and Mike Cahill. And, I  was ripped off of MONEY then SCAM Jan Windglows wanted more MONEY...JAN WINDGLOWS charged my PayPal Account $1000s
and I got a legal Charge Back then Jan Windglows starts posting lies on the
Internent about me and contacted my employers and lovers! Jan Windglows
attempted Grand Larceny and Deception Fraud by charging me over $1000 and
providing proof of service. I got a legal charge back from PayPal! How do you
SCAM the SCAMMER? Jan Windglows is the SCAM. Rip-off Scam Jasn Windglows uses
the Psychic Reading to lure for Spells, SCAM Jan Windglows stole MONEY from me.
Jan Windglows is the SCAMMER soliciting SPELLS on the Global Internet - that is
the Crime - Deception Fraud and Grand Larceny. SCAM Jan Windglows commits a
crime everytime she offers to do a SPELL for money.

 

DO NOT USE: Jan Windglows aka Janhett T. Windglows, Jim
Morgan, Mike Cahill of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com
, www.dragonspells.com , and www.amgelicseals.com ph: 714-208-4348

 

READ MULTIPLE REPORTS about SCAM Jan Windglows on Rip-off
Report.com

 

http://www.ripoffreport.com/Search/jan-windglows.aspx


 

http://www.ripoffreport.com/cult-organizations/jan-windglows-jim-mo/jan-windglows-jim-morgan-mik-5985a.htm


 

http://www.ripoffreport.com/cult-organizations/scam-jan-windglows-a/scam-jan-windglows-aka-mystica-f3d2b.htm


 

http://www.ripoffreport.com/cult-organizations/extortionist-jan-win/extortionist-jan-windglows-aka-9c736.htm


 

http://www.ripoffreport.com/astrologers-psychics/verified-criminals-j/verified-criminals-jan-windglo-3adeb.htm


 

 

 

Many ppl have been ripped off of MONEY and TIME by the
SCAM Fake Psychic Jan Windglows who uses a free psychic reading to lure you
into to buying SPELLS!!! DO NOT USE: Jan Windglows aka Janhett T. Windglows,
Jim Morgan, Mike Cahill of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com
, www.dragonspells.com , and www.amgelicseals.com ph: 714-208-4348

 

 

SCAMMERS
Jan Windglows, Jim Morgan and Mike Cahill are all Professional Criminals that
are on the RUN from POLICE so they only list a PO BOX not a real address just
like a Cyber SCAM!

 

SERIAL STALKER and SCAM Jan Windglows is a complete waste of
time and money.

ALERT Jan Windglows is a wanted criminal for Deception, Frand
Larceny and Identity Theft.

 

 

So how do you SCAM the SCAMMER?  READ multiple
valid complaints filed about SCAM Ripoff Jan Windglows on Ripoff Report.com
here is the link http://www.ripoffreport.com/Search/jan-windglows.aspx

 

SCAM Jan Windglows - no matter how many lies you come up
with - SCAM Jan Windglows you are the one SCAMMING for SPELLS!!  SCAM Jan Windglows caught in her LIES of
DECEPTION FRAUD to get anyone to pay $1000s for SPELLS. SCAM Jan Windglows
ripped me off. READ multiple valid complaints filed about SCAM
Ripoff Jan Windglows on Ripoff Report.com here is the link http://www.ripoffreport.com/Search/jan-windglows.aspx

 

FACTS: SCAM Jan Windglows is the Criminal for Deception
Fraud and is currently owns several Spell Sites that SCAM people for Money.
Blood, Love and Lust Spells, Dragon Spells, Angelic Seals, and the new Castle
Eye. DO NOT USE: Jan Windglows aka Janhett T. Windglows, Jim Morgan, Mike
Cahill of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com
, www.dragonspells.com , and www.angelicseals.com ph: 714-208-4348

 

Scam
Jan Windglows is the SCAMMER committing Deception Fraud and Identity Theft!! In
2011 Jan Windglows, Jim Morgan and Mike Cahill all will go to JAIL!! In the
meantime - SCAM Jan Windglows get a life and real job. SCAM Jan Windglows is a
complete waste of time and money. Do not call 208-714-4348 Do not use Blood
Love and Lust Spells - SCAM Jan Windglows will harass you and stalk you the
post lies on the Global Internet about you and your family.  BEWARE!!I pray for all the victims of Jan
Windglow. Psychic in Seattle told me to Turn to God.

 

READ up to date daily complaints on Rip-off Report.com
about SCAM Jan Windglows aka Janhett T. Windglows!!! READ multiple valid complaints filed about SCAM Ripoff Jan
Windglows on Rip-off Report.com here is the link http://www.ripoffreport.com/Search/jan-windglows.aspx


 

READ up to date daily complaints on Rip-off Report.com
about SCAM Jan Windglows aka Janhett T. Windglows!!! READ multiple valid complaints filed about SCAM Rip-off Jan
Windglows on Ripoff Report.com here is the link http://www.ripoffreport.com/Search/jan-windglows.aspx

 

How
do you SCAM the SCAMMER? DO NOT USE: Jan Windglows aka Janhett
T. Windglows, Jim Morgan, Mike Cahill of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com
, www.dragonspells.com , and www.amgelicseals.com ph: 714-208-4348

 

Read
MULTIPLE REPORTS of SCAM Jan Windglows on Rip-off Report.com

 

http://www.ripoffreport.com/Search/jan-windglows.aspx


 

http://www.ripoffreport.com/cult-organizations/jan-windglows-jim-mo/jan-windglows-jim-morgan-mik-5985a.htm


 

http://www.ripoffreport.com/cult-organizations/scam-jan-windglows-a/scam-jan-windglows-aka-mystica-f3d2b.htm


 

http://www.ripoffreport.com/cult-organizations/extortionist-jan-win/extortionist-jan-windglows-aka-9c736.htm


 

http://www.ripoffreport.com/astrologers-psychics/verified-criminals-j/verified-criminals-jan-windglo-3adeb.htm


 

I
am an American Citizen. I surf the Internet daily. I am against Witchcraft and
this SCAM called Jan Windglows of Scam Site Blood Love and Lust Spells, PO
Box 18, Bonners Ferry, Idaho,83805 ph: 208-714-4348. Witchcraft is a SCAM.

 

Witchcraft
is a SCAM! Jan Windglows is a SCAM? How do you scam the Scammer?  You dont only a SCAM would be in the
Spellcasting Business!

 

 

WARNING: Cyber Stalker Jan Windglows is a SCAM!
Witchcraft is a SCAM: Jan Windglows SCAMS Multiple People; DO NOT USE: Ripoff
SCAM Fake Psychic Jan Windglows is a SCAM, Verified Serial Cyber Predator and
Criminal

 

DO NOT USE: Jan Windglows aka Janhett T. Windglows, Jim
Morgan aka Michael Jenkins, Mike Cahill, Kim Thrasher, Matilda Sommerfield  of www.bloodloveandlustspells.com
, www.dragonspells.com , and www.angelicseals.com ph: 714-208-4348.

 

If you have been ripped off by any of these Gypsy Scum
Bandits all working for Queen Lilith aka Jan Windglows contact your local
Police Department and report the crime of DECEPTION FRAUD!

Report Attachments

Dragon Fire

New York,
USA
Jan Windglows Exposes Verified Criminal/Facist/Communist/NYPD COP HATER Mary Prantil,Provides Prantil's Court Record Look Up Information, Statements from "Chargeback Mary" calling NYPD "FACIST"

#3REBUTTAL Owner of company

Thu, December 09, 2010

Mary Prantil is up on Twitter making COMMUNISTIC COMMENTS about New York Mayor Bloomberg, and the NYPD !  Here is a copy and paste of "Chargeback Mary's" Twitter comments.  Following that will be step by step instructions of how the public can go to Web Crims and look up current CRIMINAL case and court information about Mary Prantil's upcoming CRIMINAL court date, her charges, etc.


Now that the cat is out of the bag for the public to see, Mary KNOWS her little games are over.  Look at this IDIOT Mary Prantil and the comments she is making on Twitter!  ( MARY PRANTIL ACTUALLY CLASSIFIES HERSELF AS A "SUCCESS" WHEN SHE IS NOTHING BUT A COMMUNIST/FACIST FAILURE )  Then she actually has the AUDACITY to talk about world peace??????

MARY PRANTIL IS NOTHING BUT A SCAM PIG, FACIST COMMUNIST HYPOCRITE who KNOWS everyone is on to her little finger pointing games- ( anything to try and divert people from finding out that YOU are the CRIMINAL here, THE pig, RIGHT, Mary? )




Ripoffreport Report Image
BestMaryPrantil American Success 
Whats great about NYC COPS they dont discriminate they will beat up EVERYBODY!


Ripoffreport Report Image
BestMaryPrantil American Success 
I love NYC however this city has become facist since Bloomberg.



Ripoffreport Report Image
BestMaryPrantil American Success 
I was disgusted with Mayor Bloomberg of NYC when he laid off 6,400 Teachers after the Times Square Bombing! MONEY FOR FACIST COPS in NYC.



Ripoffreport Report Image
BestMaryPrantil American Success 
Mary Prantil cares what GOD and HBO say about her not a SCAM seeking Witchraft like Jan Windglows! www.maryprantilripoffreport.blogspot.com/

NOW THAT EVERYONE KNOWS AND HAS PROOF THAT MARY IS THE CYBER STALKER, THE CRIMINAL THAT STARTED STALKING US TO BEGIN WITH AND WE WERE FORCED TO COME UP ON THE INTERNET AND DEFEND OURSELVES AND OUR INNOCENT BUSINESS WHILE EXPOSING HER FOR THE COMMUNIST FACIST PIG SHE IS AND GUILTY, SHE IS UP ON TWITTER BITCHING AND GRIPING ABOUT INTERNET CRIMES-------------SHE SHOULD TALK, HUH? LOL!!!!

PEOPLE LIKE CHARGEBACK MARY WHO HAVE YEARS OF CRIMINAL RECORDS SHOULD NOT GO AROUND SLAMMING INNOCENT BUSINESS OWNERS LIKE US ESPECIALLY WHEN WE FOUND ALL THE DIRT ON HER, HER CROOKED CRIMIMAL FATHER, AND MORE DIRT ON HER AS TIME GOES ON, YET MARY CANNOT KEEP HER MOUTH SHUT AND THE MORE SHE RUNS HER MOUTH, THE MORE STUPID SHE CONTINUES TO LOOK!  KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK, SCAM PIG MARY!  BECAUSE YOU CRIMINAL AS_ HAS BEEN EXPOSED!!!!

now that dummy cannot get a job due to her LONG criminal record, she is whining and trying to pass herself off as a "victim" of cyber crimes when in fact SHE is the cyber stalker, criminal, INTERNET TERRORIST who started ALL OF THIS.

KEEP TRASHING THE NYPD, PIG, BECAUSE THEY ARE THE ONES THAT WILL ARREST YOU AND PUT YOU AWAY FOR A VERY LONG TIME.....YOU WILL NOT NEED A JOB IN PRISON, FREAKO PRANTIL.


Ripoffreport Report Image
BestMaryPrantil American Success 
In the Newspaper Industry these Cyber Claims would not be put in PRINT by any legitimate Magazine;Network or Paper... so why the Internet?
Ripoffreport Report Image
BestMaryPrantil American Success 
Cyber ID Theft affects the ECONOMY! How many ppl have lost job offers or actual jobs due to Cyber ID Theft? Answer: Too many Americans
MARY PRANTIL IS AN UN-AMERICAN,UN-SUCCESSFUL, FACIST FAILURE, A REPEAT OFFENDER, WITH ABOUT 20 YEARS OF CRIMINAL RECORDS.  


READ AND FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS ENCLOSED IN THIS REPORT FOR STEP BY STEP INSTRUCTIONS OF HOW TO GO INTO MANHATTAN NEW YORK CRIMINAL COURT RECORDS TO LOOK UP CRIMINAL MARY PRANTIL'S RECORDS, CHARGES, BOOK AND CASE NUMBERS!
 
MARY PRANTIL IS IN FACT A CRIMINAL AND  TAKES GREAT PRIDE IN SCAMMING, CONNING, SLANDERING, ABUSING, AND TRYING TO EXTORT MONEY FROM INNOCENT BUSINESS OWNERS THAT SHE HAS CONTRACTED SERVICES FROM IF SHE DOES NOT GET HER WAY AND GET A REFUND.  


 
HERE IS OUR REPORT, TO EXPOSE THIS CRIMINAL IN HOPES THAT THE PUBLIC WILL BEWARE OF MARY PRANTIL WHO IS A SICK, TWISTED, PSYCHOTIC WOMAN THAT HIDES BEHIND BIBLE SCRIPTURE, THREATENS INNOCENT OTHERS. 
 
WE ARE NOT THREATENED BY MARY PRANTIL AND INTEND TO CONTINUE TO EXPOSE HER AND SHOW WHO AND WHAT SHE IS, UNTIL SHE IS BEHIND BARS.
 
 
Worst Mary PrantiLIAR Exposed !
http://www.ashrinetoqueenlilith.net
 

GOOGLE DELETED MARY PRANTIL'S " SCAM JAN WINDGLOWS" ACCOUNT ON TWITTER BECAUSE MARY PRANTIL IS A LIAR AND A TWITTER CRIMINAL-CHECK IT OUT, THAT PAGE IS GONE AS MANY OF MARY PRANTIL'S FAKE LIAR "BLOGS" THAT SHE USES TO TRY TO COVER UP HER CRIMINAL ACTS.
 
Copy and paste this link into your browser, GOOGLE DELETED IT.
 
 

Sorry, that page ( https://twitter.com/JanWindglowSCAM )   doesnt exist!
Search for a username, first or last name
 

INSTRUCTIONS HERE OF HOW TO PULL UP MARY PRANTIL'S CRIMINAL COURT TRIAL DATE FOR THE MANHATTAN NEW YORK CRIMINAL COURT:
 
Mary Prantil will be tried in Manhattan New York CRIMINAL COURT in January, specifically January 11th 2011 for several charges including stalking and aggravated harrassment and MUCH more.
 
Mary Prantil is right up there waiting to be tried along with child molesters and other unsavory criminals.
 
Look it up- on the Manhattan New York Criminal Court Docket. Go to Web Crims, and log in as a public user, via this link:
 
 

Then, go to the box that says defendant and type in Mary Prantil. You will see her CRIMINAL CHARGES , court date which is January 11th 2011 arraignment and NOT arrest charges.
 
THIS MEANS MARY PRANTIL IS GOING TO TRIAL -CRIMINAL TRIAL, SO THERE YOU HAVE IT.

What are you going to do, Mary? Get on the Internet and post blogs all over the place saying all those New York State records are lies? HERE, MARY I COPIED AND PASTED YOUR NEXT COURT DATE AND CASE NUMBERS VIA THE LINK ABOVE.
 
ANYONE WHO READS THIS THREAD SHOULD CALL THIS NUMBER TO THE MANHATTAN CRIMINAL COURTS TO VERIFY THIS INFORMATION..MARY PRANTIL HAS BEEN A REPEAT OFFENDER FOR MANY YEARS.
 
IF SHE HAD ANY REAL GUTS OR FORTITUDE, SHE WOULD ADMIT TO WHAT SHE HAS DONE AND APOLOGIZE TO THE PUBLIC AND NEVER SHOW HER FACE ON THE INTERNET AGAIN OR EVER USE A TELEPHONE.
 
MARY PRANTIL IS A SPINELESS UN AMERICAN FREAK AND STALKER THAT HAS BEEN EXPOSED TO THE PUBLIC. No matter what Mary Prantil says, the public no longer believes her.
 
Search Results 1 through 3 of 3
Note: To view case details, click the case # link (opens in new window).

Case # Defendant Summons # Appearance Date Court Judge Part
2010NY022485 Prantil, Mary 01/11/2011 New York Criminal Court B

2009NY002655 Prantil, Mary T 01/11/2011 New York Criminal Court B

2009NY046033 Prantil, Mary T 01/11/2011 New York Criminal Court B

CASE INFORMATION
CourtNew York Criminal Court
 
Case # 2009NY046033
 
Defendant Prantil, Mary T
 
Charge Detail Disposition/Sentence
PL 240.30 02 A Misdemeanor, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
DescriptionAgg Har-2nd:telephone

PL 215.50 03 A Misdemeanor, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
DescriptionCrim Contempt-2nd:disobey Crt

PL 240.30 1A
**TOP CHARGE** A Misdemeanor, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
DescriptionAggravated Harassment-2nd Deg
 
Case Details Charges
CASE INFORMATION
CourtNew York Criminal Court
 
Case # 2009NY002655
 
Defendant Prantil, Mary T
 
Charge Detail Disposition/Sentence
PL 205.30 00
**TOP CHARGE** A Misdemeanor, 1 count, Arrest charge, Arraignment charge
DescriptionResisting Arrest

PL 240.30 01 A Misdemeanor, 1 count, Arrest charge, Arraignment charge
DescriptionAgg Harass-2:communicate/alarm
 
Case Details Charges
CASE INFORMATION
CourtNew York Criminal Court
 
Case # 2010NY022485
 
Defendant Prantil, Mary
 
Charge Detail Disposition/Sentence
PL 240.30 02 A Misdemeanor, 1 count, Arrest charge, Arraignment charge
DescriptionAgg Har-2nd:telephone
PL 120.50 03 A Misdemeanor, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
DescriptionStalking 3rd
PL 240.30 01
**TOP CHARGE** A Misdemeanor, 1 count, Not an arrest charge, Arraignment charge
DescriptionAgg Harass-2:communicate/alarm
 

Mary Prantils next CRIMINAL COURT date : January 11th,2011
 
Court Calendar Details
YOU SEARCHED ON
CourtNew York Criminal Court
 
Court Part(s) B
 
Date Range 11/08/2010 01/11/2011
Modify Search
 
Website Authorization
 
PRANTIL IS RIGHT UP THERE WITH THE REST OF THE OTHER CRIMINALS- THIS IS PUBLIC RECORD ANYONE CAN GO LOOK AT IT.
 
CALL THE NYC MANHATTAN CRIMINAL COURTS AT PHONE NUMBER : 212-335-9000
New York County District Attorney's Office
 
In closing, Mary Prantil has really made an a*s out of herself and wasted her time posting fake blogs, accusing myself, my husband and other innocent people of crimes when she should instead be trying to get a grip and get herself straightened out.
 
Somehow I think that she was not always like she is, but now Prantil is one wicked evil individual, and the public should avoid her. She is dangerous, and extremely violent, split personality, or WHATEVER, JUST TRUST ME STAY AWAY FROM MARY PRANTIL and you will be glad you did !
 
again- Jim Morgan & Jan Windglows Janhett Windglows Corrects The Record -Mary Prantil Corrects The Record - All Blogs By Scammer Mary Prantil
 
Mary Prantil is the world's WORST text switcher, liar, and probably will continue to point her criminal finger at innocent people like myself, my husband James, and many other people in New York that she has a long track record of telling lies about and abusing.
 
I have the telephone contact phone number of the Assistant District Attorney that is currently prosecuting Prantil if anyone that has been following these threads would like to call him to verify that Mary Prantil IS THE CRIMINAL, much to her dismay.
 
We have had enough of all Mary Prantil's lies and her stupidity, text switching, abuse, and the like. The sooner she is put behind bars, the better off the public and Internet will be.
 
I encourage everyone reading these posts to contact me or my husband James and come visit our beautiful web sites, or just drop us a line. We are here for the public, and will continue to fight CRIMINAL MARY PRANTIL as long as she gets up on the Internet and runs her mouth.
 
Too bad for Mary (((((NOT)))))) nothing she has done or is doing is working in her favor.
 
Go to the web site we created to EXPOSE this CRIMINAL MORON. Be sure to listen to all of Mary Prantil's derranged, abusive voice messages- we placed sound files there so that everyone could see and hear for themselves what a liar and criminal Mary Prantil really is.
 
She must be very ashamed of what she has done to innocent people, otherwise she would not be so Hell bent on trying to cover it up, even when she has public records all over the place stating she is a criminal and will be tried in A NEW YORK CRIMINAL COURT in January.
 
See for yourself- go to web crims and log in as a public user, then click "defendant" then type in Mary Prantil -
 
Website Authorization
 

Here is the site anyone can look at to prove what I am stating here is true:
 
Jim Morgan & Jan Windglows Janhett Windglows Corrects The Record -Mary Prantil Corrects The Record - All Blogs By Scammer Mary Prantil
 

Take care and blessings to everyone along their journey,
From High Enchantress Janhett T. Windglows
Love Spells Spell Casting castings For Love and Financial Success
208-714-4348
 
This Report Concerns Mary T. Prantil of Queens County Astoria New York. You can also find Scam Prantil posting on Rip Off Report and other Forum sites posting against us and others under AKA Honest Person AKA Honestperson AKA Park City USA, AKA Uta, AKA Pittsburg, AKA Pennsylvania, AKA Washington D.C. AKA Washington, AKA Astoria, New York, AKA Pittsburg, AKA Pennsylvania AKA Park City, AKA Utah AKA Astoria New York AKA Phoenix Arizona AKA SadisticPsychicJanWindglowsHURTME2 - Housto


OpinionatedAmerican

Tampa,
Florida,
USA
Extortionist Jan Windglows stalks;harasses X-employees -CYBER MONSTER

#4Consumer Comment

Fri, August 06, 2010

Scammer Jan Windglows is at it again http://twitter.com/JanWindglowSCAM is the only mentallY ill person stalking and harassing innocent people on the Global Internet when they can't get scammed for MONEY.  Innocent NYC woman has been stalked EVERYDAY this week and for Years..#3057 is filed and OPEN WARRANT to arrest JAN Windglows.

Hey SCAM Jan Windglows - ONLY A SCAM Is in the Spell casting business - you are the only Criminal and you day is coming to return to SUMTER JAIL>

 

7961 Court
Bushnell, Florida

 

last known ADDRESS FOR THIS MENTALLY ILL WOMAN WHO STALKS X-EMPLOYEES AND X-CLIENTS THAT COULDN'T GET SCAMMED FOR SPELLS.

 


do not tread on me

Astoria,
New York,
USA
SCAMS Of Mary Prantil Exposed To The Public Jan Windglows - Jim Morgan Expose Criminals Mary Prantil, Frank G. Prantil, www.bloodloveandlustspells.com Rat Out Criminals, EXPOSE Crimes

#5Consumer Comment

Fri, July 30, 2010

Mary Prantil's Book & Case # from NYC Department Of Corrections - Prantil Mary IS A Verified Criminal Convicted for Deception,FRAUD, Grand LARCENY, EXTORTION, ABUSE, HARRASSMENT OF INNOCENT BUSINESS OWNERS
 
HERE FIND MARY PRANTIL'S CRIMINAL BOOK AND CASE NUMBER LOOK UP ANYONE CAN PULL IT UP BY FOLLOWING THESE SIMPLE INSTRUCTIONS:

The public may look up Mary Prantil's criminal records, on the NYC Department Of Corrections web site so you the public can see what a real piece of crap Mary Prantil really is.

Go to the following link which is the NYC jail inmate lookup: 

http://a072-web.nyc.gov/inmatelookup/

After the page has been pulled up, you will see the place where to enter Mary Prantil's Booking and Case Number, which is 3471001054- simply enter that number in the white box, as shown below.

As you will see, the NYC Department Of Corrections has all her criminal information and charges posted. As we have said numerous times in the past, we have proof of what we have been warning the public about this criminal Mary Prantil all along, so see for yourself- go to the link, enter her book and case number, the information is current and is all there for anyone because it is PUBLIC RECORD. The facts, simply put.

Enter
NYSID or Book & Case Number: ( enter 3471001054 )

You will then find, on the NYC Department of Corrections Inmate Lookup, Mary Prantil's criminal records, including her Felony Stalking charge.

May Mary Prantil rot in Hell, if the Devil will even let her in, LOL. Good riddance, freak Prantil :( LOL the joke is on U

LOOK PRANTIL TAX EVASION CHARGES AND REPORTS AGAINST YOU TAX WARRANTS REPORTED TO THE NEW YORK STATE AND FEDERAL TAX BOARDS YOU SHOULD LEARN YOUR LESSON AND LET INNOCENT PEOPLE ALONE AND MIND YOUR OWN d**n BUSINESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

TAX HOME | e-Services Help | Privacy | Security | Disclaimer | Contact Us 

Office of Tax Enforcement - File an Information Referral to report suspected tax evasion and fraud 

Check to see if you meet our minimum browser requirements for this service. 

*Required fields 

Information Referral: 
This information referral concerns a(n)* Individual Business/Tax Preparer/Practioner 

Description of Information Referral* 
Please include a detailed description of the alleged violation activity. 
https://www.integrascan.com/search_results.php?type

County in which warrant is filed of Taxpayer Searched:

MARY PRANTIL QUEENS

Warrant ID# : E-029211902-W001-3

Name of Taxpayer as appears on warrant 

Address of Taxpayer as appears on warrant

MARY PRANTIL 32-85 33 ST C2

ASTORIA, NY 11106

Date Warrant docketed by county clerk County where Warrant is docketed Tax Liability amount as appears on Warrant Date notice of tax warrant, amendment, vacation or satisfaction was filed by the Department of Taxation and Finance with the Department of State. 

Date Warrant satisfaction docketed by county clerk Date Warrant Vacate Notice docketed by county clerk Date Warrant amendment docketed by county clerk
June 10, 2008 QUEENS $106.21 June 20, 2008 


Warrant ID# : E-029159448-W001-7

Name of Taxpayer as appears on warrant 

Address of Taxpayer as appears on warrant

MARY PRANTIL 32-85 33 ST C2

ASTORIA, NY 11106

Date Warrant docketed by county clerk County where Warrant is docketed Tax Liability amount as appears on Warrant Date notice of tax warrant, amendment, vacation or satisfaction was filed by the Department of Taxation and Finance with the Department of State. Date Warrant satisfaction docketed by county clerk Date Warrant Vacate Notice docketed by county clerk Date Warrant amendment docketed by county clerk
February 14, 2008 QUEENS $4,072.14 February 14, 2008 


* Filed with Department of State on or prior to implementation of electronic filing system, January 8, 2004. Dates for filings made prior to January 8, 2004 must be derived from paper filings and should be obtained from the Department of Taxation and Finance.

Taxpayer Name(s) Selected: City specified in warrant address record of Taxpayer Searched: County in which warrant is filed of Taxpayer Searched: MARY PRANTIL, QUEENS

Subject Information: 

Please enter as much information as you can regarding the primary person allegedly involved in the complaint. 

First Name* Mary T. 
Last Name* Prantil
Street Address 32-85 33rd Street
Apt # C-2
City* Astoria
State* New York, 11106
Cell Phone Number: 9172246605
Also Known As: Mary Prantil, Mary T. Prantil, Mary Theresa Prantil 
Date of Birth January 27, 1965
Physical Description: Female, white, eyes green, hair blonde, 95 pounds
Any known partners, affiliates, etc.:

MARY PRANTIL'S TAX WARRANTS REPORTED TO:
NYS Department of Taxation and Finance 
Report Suspected Tax Evasion/Fraud 
Information Referral Unit 
Income/Franchise Desk Audit 
Albany NY 12227-0166


Report Attachments

PsychicHater

Seattle,
Washington,
United States of America
SCAM Jan Windglows Convicted Criminal for DECEPTION FRAUD;Grand Larceny and Identity Theft

#6UPDATE EX-employee responds

Tue, July 27, 2010

SCAMMERS Jan - Janhett T. Windglows and Jim Morgan have been caught in all their LIES!!!  I used to work for SCAM Jan Windglows when she lived in Bushnell, Florida.

www.bloodloveandlustspells.com is a SCAM SITE Western Union Ripoff SCAM- SCAM Jan Windglows taught me well the trade of SCAMMING innocent ppl for SPELLS and Psychic Readings.  We only used Western Union. SCAM Jan Windglows only offers a PO Box and Phone Service 208-714-4348 - bcs SCAM Jan Windglows is a Convicted Criminal from SUMTER Florida JAIL - it is of Public infomation all of SCAM Jan Windglows convictions.  SCAM Jan Windglows violated her probation and is looking at a 90 Day Jail Sentence and then re-sentencing of her Felony Charges for Deception Fraud and Grand Larceny totalling over $250,000 from an elderly woman.  The Clients family stepped in had SCAM Jan Windglows arrested for DECEPTION FRAUD - I was there I know - I bailed SCAM Jan Windglows out of JAIL - and now I want the MONEY that I paid - Jan skipped her BAIL -so pls help me find SCAM Jan Windglows.

PO Box #118
Bonners Ferry, Idaho
208-714-4348

PO BOX #712
Driggs, Idaho
208-639-2224

Last known address for SCAM Jan Windglows:

7961 Court
Bushnell, Florida
352-793-2205
805-455-6548

If SCAM Jan Windglows offers to do a SPELL for MONEY ask her for her REAL address - and when she does not give you her address - get off the PHONE - then call your local POLICE and report the CRIME of DECEPTION FRAUD.

Report Attachments

do not tread on me

Astoria,
New York,
USA
Liar Mary Trash Can For A Mouth

#7REBUTTAL Owner of company

Tue, July 27, 2010

The derrogatory posts about myself, my husband James and my innocent business was written by Mary T. Prantil.
 
Hello to all who read this- this is Enchantress Jan Windglows- I do not live in Florida, LOL and have not for about seven years.
 
The person above posting against us is a deluded woman from New York facing a lot of criminal charges, named Mary Prantil. 
 
We expect her to be thrown in jail this October hopefully sooner.  She is a liar and blabber mouth, as everyone can see, and a garbage mouth as well.   Every time she emails or calls us, we simply send her threatening emails and phone calls to the attorney in New York currently prosecuting her.
 
Mary Prantil is our "pet psycho" so to speak. Hello, Mary !  My husband James and I are here in Bonners Ferry Idaho, anyone can call us- our phone number is 208-714-4348, just like it says on our web sites. 
 
Mary would LOVE to have our home residential address so she can make more trouble for us, but that will never happen.  This is precisely why business owners have post office boxes- to avoid psychotic people like Mary of course, LOL.
 
You see, Mary is MAD because when we did her spell work, the spells WORKED, her boyfriend wanted to marry her, and then Mary messed up and drove her boyfriend off, and she has been blaming all her messed up agenda on us ever since.
 
She also has some kind of psychotic thing going where she makes up outlandish stories about other people about the same things that are happening in HER life, lol.  The woman needs to be put away, committed, locked up for the rest of her life.  She is 46 years old and still all she can do is try to make trouble for innocent people.
 
My husband James spent countless hours on the phone helping this woman.  She did receive her spell results.  She messed up her life.  Oh, well !  I have no control over what this crazy woman did to her own life and we will not back down from her and will continue to help put her behind bars.
 
So in closing, Mary is a very unhappy person, constantly blaming her own self adversities on innocent other people.  And my husband and I are not the only ones- Mary Prantil has SEVERAL people in New York that have pressed charges on her and are waiting for her to be prosecuted.
 
For future reference, my husband and I will continue to run our very reputable and innocent highly successful business and continnue to defend ourselves, no matter WHAT Mary Prantil says.
 
We know who we are, and we know who Mary Prantil is.
 
Give me a call if any questions.  By the way, I see Mary had to actually write a long story of lies about me since she did a background check and could not find anything on MY record, lol.
 
Mary Prantil certainly has PLENTY of garbage racked up against her huh?  Just think here is a woman 46 years old that will never be a responsible adult or lead a positive productive life.  But that is her problem now, and she has Divinity to answer for, for all her misdeeds and her many lies and crimes.
 
The comical thing about all of this is, nobody CARES what Mary Prantil writes or says.  She is a liar and nobody or any of my cleints EVER ask me who Mary Prantil even IS.
 
All the stories that Prantil fabricates about us are garbage, as we have stated many times.  My husband and I are very successful honest people and we are not ruffled by anything Mary Prantil says because all she is doing at this point is taking up bandwidth that someone else who has something important to say could be using up here, lol.
 
Concerning my home address- Mary is the reason I will never disclose my residential address.  I do not need her crazy as_ showing up in my neighborhood, LOL.  Anyone reading these threads would feel the same.
 

Take care and be blessed everyone, call me and come visit my website I have nothing to hide, lol.  Come and see the new beautiful altar my husband James and I have built to bring glory to Divinity. 
 

In Divinity's Service,
Enchantress Janhett T. Windglows
www.bloodloveandlustspells.com
208-714-4348

*******************************************************************************************************************
This report is concerning Frank George Prantil and his daughter Mary Theresa Prantil.  In past reports authored by Miss Prantil, she has stated that " I'm proud to have been the daughter of Frank G. Prantil" and that she again "comes from a "PRESTIGIOUS"  family based in the San Diego there in the state of California.
 
I can't speak for the character of the rest of her family as I don't personally know them however, I have no reason to believe them to be anything other then reasonable and law abiding people however, I can relay what I've read from credible sources such as transcripts from the Supreme Court, Colleges of Frank Prantil, Attorney Generals office, State Attorneys office legal sites etc pertaining to Frank G. Prantil.
 
Miss Prantil has stated that "My father got off lots of criminals" then latter went on to say: "My father got off lots of criminals and innocent people to", LOL. Well, I'm sure he did successfully defend some innocent people along the way but from the looks of it, he also was instrumental in successfully defending the trash of society such as Murders, Child Molesters, Check Forgers, Bank Robbers etc. Upon researching the records and past legal performance of Mr. Prantil, I was also informed that not only was he successful in defending the scum of humanity on several occasions but went on to be completely corrupted by the same criminals that he had been representing throughout his practice.
 
It was in my research sited below,  did I run across several charges launched against Frank G. Prantil via the Supreme and Superior court system there in California, such infractions as Perjury, Drug Poisson, Drug Abuse, Unlawfully removing $700,000 from a Clients safe as she sat in jail awaiting a murder trial and so fourth. Mr. Prantil also had interfered with the homicide trial by becoming personally involved with his Client of that same murder trial by attempting to cover for the accused so he could recover his fees. Prantil lied blatantly on several occasions and attempted to hold up the due process of law by filling one frivolous motion of delay right after another just like Mary in the current charges being lodged against her by the State of New York.
 
Frank Prantil was known as a greedy individual who would stop at nothing to accomplish his goals be they of a positive or unethical nature, JUST LIKE Mary T. Prantil his daughter, He was considered out spoken, brazened, and ruthless just like his daughter Mary T. Prantil Internet Terrorist Extraordinaire. So in essence and according to other legal professionals, Frank Prantil was nothing but a GREEDY UNETHICAL Attorney that happened to like the spotlight just like Mary. Another thing I'd like to add here. Did you know that Frank G. Prantil was in and out of rehab centers for his uncontrolled use of illegal narcotics ?, Did you know that he was imprisoned for 14 months for not only botching a homicide trial, but for being an Accomplice to check FORGERY in the commission of that crime.
 
As you can read in the research below, Mr. Prantil wasn't considered a professional on any level by the courts or his peers. Mr. Prantil was DISBARRED twice for drug, unethical activity, and leaving his Clients holding the bag simply because they ran out of money in the middle of their defense. Does any of this sound familiar ?, Does it sound like anything Miss Mary T. Prantil has done in the past ?, I would say that Little Mary is the preverbal apple that didn't fall very far from the tree, wouldn't you say ?  Well, Frank Prantil won't be bothering, SCAMMING, or ripping off his Clients any more because he's now deceased. Good Riddance I say.
 
Now, we have little Mary carrying on his legacy with all of her criminal activities such as you can view below after her fathers information. Please view the facts below coming from the Experts and those that had the misfortune of dealing with him first hand. Sounds like a real Gypsy Scum Ball to me. Read the history of this Idiot and be SHOCKED and then read about the exploits of his daughter little miss marry low life prantil, people like this should just be locked away forever and kept from wasting the courts time and resources.
 
 

High Court Closes Book on Colorful Legal Career

SAN DIEGO At Largehttp://articles.latimes.com/1989-03-31/local/me-603_1_high-court

March 31, 1989|ANTHONY PERRY

The California Supreme Court has quietly ended one of San Diego County's more clamorous legal careers.

The court this month upheld the disbarment of Frank George Prantil, a well-known attorney and aspiring politician before being convicted of perjury and forgery charges and spending 14 months in prison.

Ripoffreport Report Image
Ripoffreport Report Image

"At one time, he was considered one of the county's top defense attorneys," said attorney Eugene Iredale, who once represented Prantil. "Somehow his life just fell apart on him."

Now living outside Sacramento, the 51-year-old Prantil said he was "devastated" by the court's rejection of his plea that he was unfairly convicted. And he repeated his oft-made accusation that he was victimized because of his maverick ways.

"I'm a victim of the war on drugs," Prantil said. "The prosecutors and the courts can't stand it when someone insists that all defendants have rights."

In nearly two decades as a practicing attorney, the San Diego native was never far from the headlines. He won several high-publicity felony cases and big-money damage suits. He defended a San Diego councilman indicted in the Yellow Cab scandal.

Reporters loved his flamboyant rhetoric (he favored Shakespeare and the classics) and brash attire (he wore an American flag tie to court). His practice boomed. He moved from East County to a comfortable spread in La Jolla.

But there were also political defeats, angry public disputes, money problems and his final slide into Vacaville state prison. He concedes now that alcohol and marijuana played a role in his difficulties.

He lost races for Congress (1968), district attorney (1970) and El Cajon Municipal Court (1978). The County Bar Assn. branded him as unqualified. The State Bar in 1979 suspended him for six months for misusing a client's money.

He was convicted in 1983 of forgery and perjury in a case involving a bogus $53,000 check and, in 1986, of being an accessory to a cocaine conspiracy. Released from prison in 1987, Prantil says he will never return to San Diego County: "They rode me out on a rail."

He says that Deputy Dist. Atty. Bob Sullivan had a vendetta against him. Sullivan says that's bunk and notes that two juries convicted Prantil on a number of counts.

From his self-imposed exile, Prantil tries not to dwell on how far he has fallen. "I used to believe in ultimate justice," he said. "I don't anymore."

A Winning T-Shirt

 

T-shirts protesting the judge's decision will go on sale today in 14 San Diego County outlets of Pacific Eyes and T's, the Sorrento Valley-based T-shirt and sunglasses chain.

The new shirts show a Conner-like catamaran with a large screw through it, and a kiwi bird laughing at the sight. Price: $10.

Pacific Eyes and T's has long backed Conner against pirate-banker Michael Fay. During the September races it sold shirts saying "No Way Fay", and "Throw Another Kiwi on the Barbie."

A Well-Done Roast

In Pete Wilson's latter years as mayor of San Diego, it was said he had two goals: to learn to sing and to become governor.

He took lessons and can manfully handle a tune. The second goal eluded him, and he settled for the U. S. Senate. Now, he's trying to rectify that with his third try at the governorship, with his likely Democratic foe being Atty. Gen. John Van de Kamp.

Thursday night the Republican Wilson was among those roasting Assembly Speaker Willie Brown (D-San Francisco) at a benefit dinner in Oakland.

He joked that he wasn't surprised to find picketers carrying signs urging him to stay in the Senate. What did surprise him, he said, was that one of the signs was carried by Van de Kamp.

==========================================================================================

 
 
 

843 F.2d 314

Frank George PRANTIL, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 86-6669.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 23, 1987*.
Memorandum Jan. 4, 1988.
Order and Opinion March 31, 1988.

Frank G. Prantil, Fair Oaks, Cal., pro se.

M. Howard Wayne, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Diego, Cal., for respondent-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California.

Before CHOY, FARRIS and HALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Frank George Prantil, a California state prisoner, appeals the district court's summary dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254.

I.

2

Prantil, formerly an attorney in California, was introduced to Daryl Bell by his client Melvin Goins. Prantil agreed to represent Bell on a criminal charge. A few weeks later a woman purporting to be Bell's mother asked Prantil to help her negotiate an escrow check from which Prantil would receive his fee. Prantil accompanied the woman to his bank where he informed the teller that the woman was his client's mother and that he wanted to deposit the check into his trust account. The woman signed the check, which was made payable to Joanna F. McKnight, and Prantil endorsed it to his trust account. Neither Prantil nor the woman indicated that the check might not be genuine.

3

Subsequently, the owner of an escrow agency discovered that three checks were missing from her office. One of the checks had been made out to Joanna F. McKnight and deposited in Prantil's account. The agent's signature had been forged on the check.

4

Prantil was charged with forgery in violation of Section 470 of the California Penal Code. At trial, Prantil argued he knew nothing of the forgery, and that he had deposited the check merely for collection purposes to see whether it was genuine.To establish that Prantil knew the escrow check was forged, the prosecution introduced evidence concerning four trust deeds which Prantil had prepared. Prantil had received information suggesting that the four deeds were forged and that Goins and Bell, were responsible for the forgeries.

5

Prantil was convicted of forgery and sentenced to two years in prison. The California Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. People v. Prantil, 169 Cal.App.3d 592, 215 Cal.Rptr. 372 (1985). The California Supreme Court denied review and the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari. Prantil v. California, 475 U.S. 1067, 106 S.Ct. 1381, 89 L.Ed.2d 606 (1986).1

6

Prantil filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in federal district court. The district court summarily denied the petition. This court granted Prantil's application for a certificate of probable cause.2

II.

7

Prantil contends that numerous trial court errors and a district court delay in deciding his habeas petition denied him due process.

8

This court reviews de novo a district court's denial of a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Turner v. Compoy, 827 F.2d 526, 528 (9th Cir.1987). This court presumes the state court's findings of fact to be correct. 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254(d).

III.

9

Prantil contends he was denied due process because the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to establish that he passed the forged escrow check "as true and genuine."3

10

This court determines whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979).

11

The evidence established that Prantil received information prior to the transaction which suggested that Goins and Bell were involved in a forgery scheme. He also knew that one of the possible victims of the scheme was Joanna McKnight, who was described to him as an elderly woman between the ages of 78 and 80. Yet, despite this knowledge, when Prantil deposited the escrow check into his trust account he did not inform the teller that the check might be a forgery or that the woman with him, who appeared to be approximately 40 to 45 years of age, might not be the person whose name appeared on the check. He merely endorsed the check and asked that it be deposited into his account.

12

Prantil's knowledge of the previous forgeries and the contradictory descriptions of McKnight could have led the jury to reasonably conclude that by failing to alert the bank, Prantil was attempting to pass the check "as true and genuine." See People v. Williams, 186 Cal.App.2d 420, 424, 8 Cal.Rptr. 871, 873 (1960) (tender of check purporting to be signed by specific person established "true and genuine" requirement). Thus, the district court did not err in the determining there was sufficient evidence for a rational trier of fact to find that the "true and genuine" requirement was established beyond a reasonable doubt.

IV.

13

Prantil contends that the trial court deprived him of due process by giving two erroneous jury instructions.

14

This court evaluates jury instructions "in the context of the overall charge to the jury as a component of the entire trial process." Bashor v. Risley, 730 F.2d 1228, 1239 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied 469 U.S. 838, 105 S.Ct. 137, 83 L.Ed.2d 77 (1984). To warrant habeas relief, the instruction cannot be merely "undesirable, erroneous, or even 'universally condemned,' " but must violate some due process right guaranteed by the fourteenth amendment. Cupp v. Naughten, 414 U.S. 141, 146, 94 S.Ct. 396, 400, 38 L.Ed.2d 368 (1973). Moreover, the petitioner in a habeas proceeding has the burden of demonstrating that an erroneous instruction "so infected the entire trial that the resulting conviction violates due process." Darnell v. Swinney, 823 F.2d 299, 301 (9th Cir.1987), petition for cert. filed, (Oct. 1, 1987).

15

Prantil challenges the trial court's instruction regarding the elements of forgery. He contends that by omitting the "true and genuine" requirement, the trial court denied him his due process right to have the jury consider each element of the charged offense. See Connecticut v. Johnson, 460 U.S. 73, 87-88, 103 S.Ct. 969, 978, 74 L.Ed.2d 823 (1983) (instruction on presumption of intent reversible error because permitted jury to convict defendant without examining evidence concerning essential element of crime).

16

The trial court gave the following instructions on the elements of forgery:

17

Now, in order to prove the commission of such crime [forgery], each of the following elements must be proved, each of them. Here we go.

18

Number one, that a person passed or offered to pass a forged instrument. That is the first one.

19

Two that such person knew that the instrument was forged; and three, that such person passed or offered to pass such instrument with the specific intent to defraud another person or persons.

20

Although the instruction omitted the "true and genuine" requirement, we consider the instruction in conjunction with the other instructions. See Bashor, 730 F.2d at 1239. Prior to giving the challenged instruction the court told the jury:

21

Now, every person with the specific intent to defraud--now, remember that I told you 'specific intent.' That's it. That's specific intent--with the specific intent to defraud another, utters, publishes, passes or attempts to pass or make use--there's a lot of things here--or make use of, as true and genuine, any false, altered, forged or counterfeited instrument or document, knowing the same to be false, altered, forged or counterfeited, is guilty of the crime of forgery. (emphasis added)

22

Because the overall charge to the jury informed them of the true and genuine requirement, Prantil was not denied his due process right to have the jury consider every element of the crime.

23

Prantil also contends he was denied due process because the trial court gave an inapplicable and erroneous jury instruction on aiding and abetting. Prantil argues that the accomplice instruction removed an issue of intent from the jury's consideration and thus constituted reversible error under the reasoning of Johnson and Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510, 99 S.Ct. 2450, 61 L.Ed.2d 39 (1979).

24

However, the prosecutor specifically denied that Prantil could be guilty as an aider and abettor instead of as a principal. An erroneous jury instruction does not merit habeas relief if the deficiencies pertain to matters that are not in dispute and the error did not so affect the entire trial as to deprive the defendant of due process.See Darnell, 823 F.2d at 302-03. The trial court gave proper instructions regarding the intent necessary to convict Prantil as a principal to the forgery. Because the prosecution did not present an accomplice theory, any deficiencies went to a matter that was not in dispute. The error did not mislead the jury on a disputed issue and thus did not so infect the trial as to deprive Prantil of due process. Id.

V.

25

Prantil contends that the trial court denied him due process by refusing to grant judicial use immunity to a potentially exonerating witness.

26

On his motion for a new trial, Prantil claimed that Goins could testify that Goins and Bell had set up Prantil, that Prantil was unaware that the check was stolen, and that Bell had lied to Prantil when he said there were criminal charges pending against him. Goins had been unavailable to testify at the trial because he was in prison on an unrelated charge. At the new trial hearing Goins invoked the privilege against self-incrimination and refused to testify at the trial unless he received judicial use immunity because he was in prison on an unrelated charge. The court denied Prantil's motion to grant immunity to Goins.

27

Under California law, a court may only grant immunity on the prosecutor's request. Cal. Penal Code Sec. 1324. See In re Weber, 11 Cal.3d 703, 720, 523 P.2d 229, 240, 114 Cal.Rptr. 429, 440 (1974). However, the prosecution's failure to request immunity violated Prantil's due process rights if it deprived him of his right to a fair trial. See United States v. Garner, 663 F.2d 834, 839 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 905, 102 S.Ct. 1750, 72 L.Ed.2d 161 (1982).

28

Here, Prantil's unsupported assertion is the only indication that Goins would have presented exculpatory testimony had he been granted immunity. The record contains overwhelming evidence that Prantil was not an unwitting accomplice in the crime, much of which would not be controverted by Goins' testimony even if that testimony is as Prantil contends it would be. For example, Prantil knew that the woman who deposited the check in his account did not match the description of the woman whose name appeared on the check. On these facts, we hold that Prantil was not deprived of a fair trial. If Prantil was denied a fair trial in this case, trial courts would be required to grant immunity simply on the basis of unsupported allegations by criminal defendants that immunity is required by due process.

29

Moreover, Prantil has made no showing that any misconduct on the part of the prosecutor caused Goins to invoke his privilege against self-incrimination. See United States v. Lord, 711 F.2d 887, 890-92 (9th Cir.1983).

VI.

30

Prantil contends he was denied due process because of a twenty-month delay between the date of the alleged crime and the date of the indictment.

31

A pre-indictment delay, unlike a delay in bringing a charged defendant to trial, is "tested by general proscriptions of due process."4 Arnold v. McCarthy, 566 F.2d 1377, 1381 (9th Cir.1978). A pre-indictment delay does not justify habeas relief unless the defendant can show actual prejudice. Id. at 1382. To prove actual prejudice a defendant must give more than "mere assertions that ... witnesses' memories may have faded with the passage of time...." United States v. Horowitz, 756 F.2d 1400, 1405 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 822, 106 S.Ct. 74, 88 L.Ed.2d 60 (1985).

32

Prantil contends that he suffered actual prejudice because the bank teller could no longer remember the details of the escrow check transaction. However, the state court of appeals found that the delay did not affect the teller's memory. In addition, the court noted that Prantil was benefited by the teller's unresponsiveness to certain questions; therefore there was no prejudice.

33

Prantil also claims that a seven-month delay between the time he filed his habeas petition and the time the district court dismissed the action violated his right to due process.5

34

In Carter v. Thomas, 527 F.2d 1332 (5th Cir.1976), the Fifth Circuit held that a district court's procedure for handling habeas petitions which routinely resulted in delays of up to twenty months violated due process. However, in Satterlee v. Kritzman, 626 F.2d 682, 683 (9th Cir.1980), we held that a district court's clerical error which resulted in an eight-month delay between the dismissal of a prisoner's habeas petition and the time his files were forwarded to the court of appeals did not deprive the petitioner of any substantive rights. As in Satterlee, here there is no policy of discrimination and no showing that the delay was purposeful.

VII.

35

We conclude that the district court properly dismissed Prantil's petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

36

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4 and Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)

1

Because Prantil's direct appeal presented the same constitutional claims as his subsequent habeas petition, it is unnecessary for him to have filed for state habeas relief. Turner v. Compoy, 827 F.2d 526, 528 (9th Cir.1987)

2

Prantil was released from prison on April 20, 1987. However, because a felony conviction may cause a defendant to suffer adverse collateral consequences even after he has served his sentence, a defendant's release from custody prior to the completion of his federal habeas corpus proceedings will not render his petition moot. Carafas v. LaVallee, 391 U.S. 234, 237-38, 88 S.Ct. 1556, 1559, 20 L.Ed.2d 554 (1968). Prantil was in custody when he filed the petition in district court, so this court retains jurisdiction over the proceedings after he is released. Id

3

Under California law, a person is guilty of forgery if he passes or attempts to pass as true and genuine a forged instrument with knowledge of the forgery and with the specific intent to defraud. Cal. Penal Code Sec. 470; People v. Hellman, 189 Cal.App.2d 777, 778-79, 11 Cal.Rptr. 433 (1961). The only element Prantil challenges as lacking sufficient evidence is the true and genuine requirement

4

Once a suspect is indicted, the more stringent requirements of the speedy trial right apply. Arnold v. McCarthy, 566 F.2d 1377, 1382 (9th Cir.1978)

5

Prantil first raised the issue in his brief to this court. Ordinarily, this court will not decide an issue which was not raised at the District Court. Bolker v. C.I.R., 760 F.2d 1039, 1042 (9th Cir.1985). The court may decide an issue for the first time on appeal, however, where review is necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice or to preserve the integrity of the judicial process. Id. Because a claim that a district court violated a party's due process rights questions the integrity of the federal judicial system, we review Prantil's claim despite his failure to raise it below

//