- Report: #329898
Complaint Review: John J. Pugh Attorney National Credit Acceptance - Sacremento California
-
Author Confirmed
Why?
John J. Pugh Attorney National Credit Acceptance
9738 Lincoln Village Dr Sacremento, 95827 California, U.S.A.
Phone:
916-830-0556
Web:
N/A
Categories:
Business Rating:
(0)
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good?
John J. Pugh Attorney, National Credyt CorpJohn J. Pugh Attorney, National Credit Acceptance Unethical practices on unexpecting citizens Sacremento California
My Bank account was completely wiped out with out any notice. Left it over drawn and left a single mother without money for food, gas or bills. This was in an attempt to collect a debt where a default judgement was enterd in his favor. The company said I was Sub-served at a residence that I had not lived at in 3 years. He then waited over 2 years to take all my money becasue the staute of limitations was up for me to have the Default judgement set aside.
This is not an isolated incident. I tried to talk to him and find out what it was all about but I was given the Credit compaies number and that is how I found out about the court hearing that took place 3 years ago.
Mindi
Tempe, Arizona
U.S.A.
This is not an isolated incident. I tried to talk to him and find out what it was all about but I was given the Credit compaies number and that is how I found out about the court hearing that took place 3 years ago.
Mindi
Tempe, Arizona
U.S.A.
2 Updates & Rebuttals
Larry
Phoenix,Arizona,
U.S.A.
You may have a case
#2Consumer Suggestion
Wed, May 07, 2008
You left out a lot of details, including where this lawsuit was filed. A court has no jurisdiction over a defendant until he has been served with a summons. The plaintiff has the burden of proving that the defendant was properly served. The plaintiff also has the burden of locating the defendant. Normally, serving someone who resides with you would be legal but the plaintiff would still have the burden of proving that you do actually reside there. In this case it sounds like Mr. Pugh failed to locate you and served someone you do not reside with. Mr. Pugh obtained a judgment by fraudulently representing to the court that you had been properly served with process. Since the judgment was the result of fraud perpetrated by the plaintiff upon the court, there was never a lawful judgment. You also have a claim that the court had no jurisdiction due to insufficient process. In Arizona, the issue of jurisdiction may be raised at any time.
Mike
Oroville,California,
U.S.A.
File A Complaint w/ The State Bar & Sacramento County District Attorney
#3Consumer Comment
Tue, May 06, 2008
Mindi, This is horrible and Mr. Pugh is long overdue for an inverstigation by the State Bar and the Sacramento County District Attorneys Office. You should promtply file a written complaint today and attached supporting documents showing that you have not lived at the supposed address service was performed: Office of the Chief Trial Counsel/Intake The State Bar of California 1149 South Hill Street Los Angeles, California 90015-2299 I have also filed complaints for the same exact thing. Using an old address to service and waiting for the 2 year statue to burn off and then starting aggressive collection efforts. Don't allow this dirtbag to get away with it and file your complaint today. The more complaints the better the chance the Mr. Pugh will be held accountable.
