Michael
Waterford,#2UPDATE Employee
Thu, February 12, 2009
I have attached a copy of all the correspondence between Kenmar Watches and Michael Jones. Please read and make your own determination of the claims posted by Michael Jones. From: Michael P On Behalf Of Customer Service Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 1:07 PM To: Jones, Michael D(MDJONES) Cc: Jeff F Subject: RE: RMA #25518-1231 Michael: We have not drawn a line in the sand and our intention was never to go into battle with you. All we have done is attempt to represent the facts accurately in the proper context. We suggested that you return the item to us on December 29, 2008 and told you that you would not be responsible for any charges if the item was defective. (FACT) You elected not to return the item to us (FACT). You waited almost 30 days before contacting us on January 29, 2009 regarding your request to return the item. (FACT) You received the item on December 16, 2008. (FACT) Our return policy allows 14 days from the date you receive the item to return the item. (FACT) You claim the watch is not keeping accurate time, but refused to be specific. (FACT) The item has been worn and used. (FACT) We have answered and responded to all of your questions and e-mails promptly. (FACT) You have failed to respond to the procedures outlined in our written return policy. (FACT) We do all we can to support and work with customers making reasonable requested. (FACT) I challenge you to dispute any of the facts listed above. MM From: Jones, Michael D(MDJONES) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 12:54 PM To: Customer Service Cc: Jeff F Subject: RE: RMA #25518-1231 Mike, we have both drawn our lines in the sand and it seems neither of us is willing to budge. I know what I expected, I know what I still expect. Even if I elected to send the watch to you, to have you go through Anne Klein's repair service, I would have paid for the shipping, correct ? Were you going to foot the bill for that ? On Dec 31st, you issued an RMA and I was expecting, and waiting for the replacement watch to come to me, so I could place the defective one in the box and return it to you. That is how almost every other RMA works that I have dealt with. In no way at all should I have had any expenses in getting a defective product to you, not one cent. As a consumer that is what is right. I chose to send the item to Anne Klein because I was not confident in your company being able to handle my request. You have done a bang up job so far in making sure You know where I stand. I very certainly know where you and your company stands. I am not going to cancel my complaint against you with the BBB and I still feel that you have been more than unwilling to help me. You have VERY certainly and quite eloquently defended your position with wonderful statistical accuracy and I applaud you for that. But the bottom line is very, very simple no matter how you wish to wordsmith it. Your guarantee on both your website, and your top ten reasons to buy from Kenmar mean absolutely nothing. I have repeatedly alerted you that I am not satisfied, and I have asked for satisfaction to be given via one of 2 methods, both of which you have steadfastly denied. At this point, it is what it is I guess, because I do not see you even REMOTELY willing to do anything to try and make this situation any better for me. --------------------- This e-mail (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged, proprietary, or confidential information. The information may also contain technical data subject to export control laws. --------------------- ________________________________________