Complaint Review: Luis Anthony Ewing tribal lawyer - Moclips Washington

Opinion in general (not necessarily applying to LE)  : Keep payments small making SURE you received what was promised before--before you offer any more money. Anyone who doesn't follow the above might regret it. Don't believe any  BS offered.

Verify for yourself any information. Now to Luis. Have fun.  Ask him if he ever had people send him money wrapped in tin foil.  Ask him if and how long his kids were in diapers to use 'the need diaper' excuse to pry money from you.

Ask him if and how many times he's labeled clients drunk. Ask him if honestly he has ever not delivered upon being paid for documents he promised. Ask him if and how many times he's told people they need to go to Wash DC or their state to find the alleged archived real constitution.  Or my favorite "the blue citer book".

Ask him if he can post any of those alleged archived state constitutions. Don't get me wrong, Luis has interesting and ?? times correct information. But look at this example from LE in (brackets): For EXAMPLE, here in Washington State the REVISED CODE OF WASHINGTON (RCW) clearly states that the CONSTITUTION is a mere STATUTE just like every other State does in it’s statute books!!!

"RCW 9A.04.110 Definitions.

(24) "Statute means the Constitution or an act of the legislature or initiative or referendum of this state."

The WASHINGTON CONSTITUTION is a RCW STATUTE as clearly stated in subsection (24) of RCW 9A.04.110!!!

THERE IS A STATUTE IN EVERY STATE THAT SAYS THAT YOUR STATE CONSTITUTION IS A STATUTE JUST LIKE HERE IN WASHINGTON!!!)

The above was allegedly from LE so now we investigate to find the BEGINNING part of the sentence.--i.e. what LE conveniently FORGOT to tell you:

RCW 9A.04.110 Definitions. In this title unless a different meaning plainly is required:

Thus read properly "In this title (title 9--hardly all of them)..."statute" means the constitution OR an act of the legislature..."

"Means" as used in this sense is "to have importance to a degree of." 

Notice carefully LE didn't put a " at the end of the word "statute" but rather at the end of the sentence. If you look at the actual section he cites, the word "statute" has a " at the beginning an end of the word.

The word "statute" thus does NOT have the meaning it does in a dictionary sense but rather only the definition it does for that title as written in that title.  

LE in his claim is thus "hopping" out of the RCW to imply the word statute in a dictionary-sense, yet hopping back into RCW to say "the Wash. constitution is a statute."

For example, Definition. In this title....the word "cerulean" will mean blue or.... Does that make blue, cerulean?? Nope.  

 We know you are the one replying to this mess quit trying to hide behind your messages and stop using GODS WORD like your some kind of religious man! Email guys at saleslady2014 at gmail

 YOU MR EWING MIGHT AS WELL FORGET TAKING THOUSANDS FROM PEOPLE THE WAY YOU TALK. Who in their RIGHT MIND would hire such a man with the attitude you have. Im sure YOU ARE SO PERFECT right? I can recall YOU being a little loopy in some of our conversations. I filed every paper you sent me and the CONCLUSION IS AND ALWAYS WILL BE it did NOT WORK PERIOD! If I didn't plead guilty the next week it was going to trial and I was gonna get WAY MORE time than they offered me. NONE of your paperwork WORKED THAT I FILED and you wasn't so great at returning my calls cause you stay up all night long and sleep all day.. THEY DID NOT EVEN RECOGNIZE IT ONLY ONE TIME AND THAT WAS THE CONTINUANCE. I could of got a continuance from my court appointed lawyer that I dint pay thousands to. Your so called business just cant work sitting home on you a**. You have to BE AT THE COURTHOUSE or the judge wont even recognize any of the paperwork, that is how it worked for me. IF YOU WON ANYTHING Id say you was THERE. YOU told me of a case you won but YOU WAS THERE!! THAT IS WHAT IT BOILS DOWN TO. Now IF I didn't have a court appointed lawyer it may be different but I KNOW BY EXPERIENCE that the judge will not DISMISS ONE UNLESS YOU SIGN IN 'AT' THE COURTROOM. And if anyone is crazy enough to hire you then that is on them.Save your breath to try to convince someone else that you can win for them if they have a court appointed lawyer cause IT WILL NOT WORK PERIOD!!!

 no sense in Mr Ewing butting heads if anyone wants proof of what I say just email me. He is trying to defend himself cause he has an ONLINE name for his business hes trying to uphold. Why would I LIE like he says why would I have to If anyone wants info just email me case closed. He did NOTHING for me that WORKED.

YES HE PUT IN THE WORK BUT IF YOU DON'T KNOW THE LAW ON HOW TO DEAL WITH THE COURTS YOU SHOULDN'T HAVE A BUSINESS AND CHARGE PEOPLE THOUSANDS. I'd THINK TWICE IF YOU ARE CONSIDERING hiring him, DON'T BE FOOLED BY HIS POMPOUS WORDS CAUSE HE PROVES himself TO BE AN A*S!

  IT’S SO EASY FOR ANYONE TO PROVE THAT KAREN DARNELL IS LYING JUST BY SIMPLY ORDERING A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE COURT DOCKET AND YOU WILL HAVE CERTIFIED PROOF THAT KAREN DARNELL IS AN . . . "EXODUS 23:1; EXODUS 23:2 AND JOHN 8:44 LIAR.” Please call up the HARDIN CIRCUIT COURT CLERK AT THE HARDIN COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER, 120 EAST DIXIE AVENUE, ELIZABETH TOWN, KY 42701-1975, at telephone: 1 - (270) 766-5500, and Order a Certified Copy of the Court Docket No. 16-M--01435, and you will have . . . "CERTIFIED PROOF THAT KAREN A. DARNELL IS A LIAR” . . . because the "CERTIFIED COPY” of the court docket clearly shows that Karen Darnell NEVER even noted up Luis Ewing’s awesome winning motion for a motions hearing to be heard with oral arguments, KAREN DARNELL NEVER EVEN TRIED, KAREN A. DARNELL JUST PLED GUILTY! The CERTIFIED COPY OF THE DOCKET No. 16-M--01435, clearly shows that Karen Darnell . . . "NEVER NOTED UP THE TERMINATION OF COUNSEL GRACE CHAMBERS” . . . to be scheduled on the court docket for . . . "A MOTIONS HEARING” . . . as Mr. Ewing told her that he would give to her when she is ready to argue her motion prior to her trial date which the court had not set any court date for yet, she wanted to wait for the Supreme Court of Kentucky to decide whether or not retroactively apply harsher penalties to go back 10 years. Mr. Ewing told her that he would have her file a Faretta Waiver and Demand to Proceed Pro-se and Note up her Termination of Counsel Grace Chambers whenever the Court set an actual trial date because the court also was waiting for the Supreme Court’s decision to apply harsher penalties retroactively.

However, literally every time Mr. Ewing called up Ms. Karen Darnell, she was too drunk to speak on the phone and vice versa, literally every time Karen Darnell called Luis Ewing, she was too drunk and incoherent to maintain a conversation, even her own text messages said she had to stop texting because she was too drunk to text. Karen Darnell is lying when she says that . . . "YOU CANNOT FIRE A COURT APPOINTED LAWYER” . . ., the judge in my case in Louisiana told me the same thing, that I could not represent myself, that if I could not afford to hire my own attorney that I would have to accept a public defender, but I stood my ground like Luis Ewing told me to, so how come I prevailed and won my Felony Assault Case? I overcame my judge because I stood my ground and argued against the judge and I fired the court appointed lawyer in the very beginning by me NOT even allowing the judge to appoint me counsel in the first place in my own case in the STATE OF LOUISIANA in the Fourth Judicial District Court for the Parish of Ouachita in the State of Louisiana Court Case Cause No. 17-F2940-1, where the court system and the judges are a lot harsher on "pro-se” litigants . . . "BECAUSE LOUISIANA OPERATES UNDER NAPOLEONIC LAWS, IT’S A LOT HARDER TO WIN CASES IN LOUISIANA” . . . whereas, . . . "IN KENTUCKY, IT’S WAY EASIER TO FIGHT YOUR OWN CASES” . . . than it is in Louisiana, because they do NOT operate under "NAPOLEONIC LAWS.”

It’s NOT Luis Ewing’s fault that Ms. Darnell "got scared of the judge” and/or "chickened out” and decided to NOT even try to use his awesome winning briefs to beat a really minor easy case such as her CPS. My case in Louisiana was a Felony Case and a much more serious matter than a mere misdemeanor easy drunk driving charge in Kentucky. In my case when the Judge attempted to appoint counsel on me against my will, I stood my ground with the information that Mr. Luis Ewing gave and I followed his super easy Instructions and I told the judge . . . "I DO NOT WAIVE MY RIGHTS TO THE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL AND I WILL FILE A CIVIL LAWSUIT AGAINST ANY LOUISIANA STATE LICENSED BAR ATTORNEY WHO ATTEMPTS TO REPRESENT ME WITHOUT MY PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT” . . . and the Judge said to me in response . . . "WELL MS. CALHOUN, OBVIOUSLY YOU KNOW THE LAW” . . . and . . . "THE JUDGE DISMISSED THE FELONY CHARGES” . . . and set another court date for my misdemeanor charges which are about to be dismissed also! MS. DARNELL IS LYING AND THE COURT DOCKET CLEARLY SHOWS THAT SHE HAD NOT NOTED UP THE TERMINATION OF HER COUNSEL GRACE CHAMBERS OR ANY OTHER MOTION FOR A MOTION HEARING. The Court Docket does NOT show that the Judge tossed out anything, Ms. Darnell lied about that also as the Court Docket clearly shows that Ms. Darnell . . . "NEVER NOTED UP ANY DOCUMENT FOR A MOTIONS HEARING” . . ., because Mr. Ewing had not yet provided her with a Note for Motions hearing Motion because the court at that time still had not set any court date, because the court was still waiting on the Supreme Court of Kentucky to make a ruling on whether or not they were going to apply the new harsher penalties for drunk drivers to apply retroactively to go back ten years or not.

Another thing that Ms. Darnell lies about when she says . . . "I am no DRUNK this was my PAST” . . ., I am LAUGHING at this absurd statement because this . . . "DRUNKEN LIAR” . . . is in fact . . . "TALKING ABOUT A CURRENT DRUNK DRIVING CASE” . . . that just recently concluded, specifically, the Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Karen A. Darnell, Cause No. 16-M--01435. Ms. Darnell doesn’t want you folks out there to have her personal information because she doesn’t want you to find out . . . "THE TRUTH” . . ., because with her personal information, you could run a check on her yourself and find out . . . "THE TRUTH” . . . that she has . . . "A HISTORY OF DRUNK DRIVING” . . . and that Karen Darnel is a liar period! Karen A. Darnell: Telephone: 1 - (502) xxx-xxxx E-mail: DOB: 06//19xx Drivers License No.: (((REDACTED)))1 SSN: 405-xx-xxxx

Another thing that Ms. Darnell is telling lies about is by falsely alleging that it is against the law to post someone’s personal information on the internet and that is 100% false for several reasons, first, she voluntarily provided Luis Ewing with all her personal information, second, all of her personal information is public record. The truth is that Ms. Darnell doesn’t want you to have her personal information or her case number in the Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Karen A. Darnell, Cause No. 16-M--01435, because if you have her personal information, you will be able to catch her in her lies by simply Ordering a Copy of the Court Docket from HARDIN CIRCUIT COURT CLERK AT THE HARDIN COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER, 120 EAST DIXIE AVENUE, ELIZABETH TOWN, KY 42701-1975, at telephone: 1 - (270) 766-5500 The truth is that Ms. Darnell decided to NOT even try to use Mr. Ewing’s awesome winning motions, the Court Docket proves that Ms. Darnell . . . "NEVER NOTED UP ANY MOTION FOR A MOTIONS HEARING” . . ., she just pled guilty because Mr. Ewing refused to guarantee a win, subsequently Ms. Darnell asked for a refund after Mr. Ewing did all the work. It’s BS for someone to ask for a refund after they did all the work, especially when they made the decision to NOT even . . . "NOTE THE MOTIONS UP FOR A MOTION HEARING” . . . and . . . "DECIDED TO PLEAD GUILTY.

The Truth is that Ms. Darnell decided to NOT use Mr. Ewing’s awesome winning motions and NEVER even tried to argue her case, she asked for a refund after Mr. Ewing did all the Work and got pissed off when Mr. Ewing refused to refund the money he already earned and did the work for and so this lying drunk Karen Darnell decided to make up false stories that the easy Kentucky Courts won’t let you fire your attorneys and go pro-se in a minor misdemeanor case in violation of Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S. Ct. 2525, 45 L. Ed. 2d 562 (1975), which allows anyone to file a Faretta Waiver and allows any judge to hold a Faretta Waiver Hearing, but again, Karen Darnell . . . "NEVER NOTED UP THE TERMINATION OF HER COUNSEL BOTTOM LINE IS THAT THE COURT DOCKET CLEARLY SHOWS THAT MS DARNELL NEVER NOTED UP ANY MOTION FOR A MOTIONS HEARING, THE COURT DOCKET CLEARLY SHOWS THAT SHE JUST PLED GUILTY AND THEREFORE, THIS PROVES THAT KAREN DARNELL IS LYING, END OF STORY PERIOD! Sincerely Luis Ewing’s "Sexetary”, the future Mrs. L.Ewing * * * * * * Luis Ewing home office phone: 1 - (360) 335-1322 Luis Ewing cellular phone: 1 - (253) 226-3741 SKYPE: Email1: [email protected] Email2: [email protected] Email3: [email protected] PLEASE SEND ALL $$$ GREEN 18 U.S.C. § 8 FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE $$$ CASH ONLY DONATIONS BY FEDERAL EXPRESS ONLY TO: Luis Ewing c/o 4731 State Route 109, (City of) Moclips, The State of Washington [98562]

First of all YOU MR EWING  are LYING ..I did EVERYTHING YOU ASKED ME TO DO with NUMEROUS trips to the courthouse for everyone to laugh at me until I found out that YOU CANNOT FIRE A COURT APPOINTED LAWYER LIKE YOU SAID AND LIKE YOU SENT ME TO FILE A DOCUMENT IN WHICH THE JUDGE "TOSSED OUT"  like you instructed me to do.

Another thing Mr Lewis is I am no DRUNK this was my PAST ""do you not have a past?"" All your threatening emails about how you ARE GOING TO POST ALL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION ONLINE FOR THE WORLD TO SEE WOW..do you think in saying this that people will HIRE YOU, better think again,  I KNOW IF I READ IT I WOULDNT IF PEOPLE ARE SMART THEY WOULDNT EITHER ALL THEY HAVE TO DO IS MESSAGE ME.

IF you are trying to make a living ONLINE like you did with me $7500 isnt chicken feed then I suspect you should act a little more professional. Isnt it against the law for a so called TRIBAL lawyer use your PERSONAL INFORMATION LIKE YOU SAID let me read the mail again....""YOU are going to REMOVE ALL YOUR NEGATIVE POSTS ABOUT ME on that report or I will post online YOUR DATE OF BIRTH, YOUR DRIVERS LICENSE NUMBER AND YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER AND YOUR COURT CASE NUMBER ALL OVER THE INTERNET WHICH PROVES YOU ARE A LIAR"" (word for word)

Number one ISNT THAT AGAINST THE LAW AND OMG I HAVE PROOF OF WHO DID IT IF IT IS DONE BY EMAIL ADMITTING TO IT. Isnt that like a Fereral offense or something? I know there is some wrong to it and I HAVE THE PROOF IT WOULD BE YOU!!!. If your crazy nut brain would of not spoke before you listened I was being nice to you and you ruined it all. I am ONLY TELLING THE TRUTH. ALMOST EVERY CONVERSATION YOU AND I HAD WAS EITHER EMAIL OR MESSENGER SO i HAVE WHAT YOU HAVE. 

ITS LIKE I SAID I PLED GUILTY AND GOT 6 MONTHS FOR $7500 wow geese thanks! NOT ...i PLED GUILTY BECAUSE LIKE i SAID YOU CANT HELP NO ONE LIKE YOU SAY YOU CAN WITH A COURT APPONTED LAWYER. If I knew that before you rushed me to send you CASH AND FEDX IT TO YOU I wouldnt of hired you(I have proof and pictures)so call me what you will I just know you brag way too much to not really know half the things you should when it comes to law, what a snotty attitude! And what makes me upset is how you use GODS WORD to try to get people to turn you way and believe you..real scammers do that. Guess you have experience huh, you got me!!

 DO NOT LISTEN TO THIS DRUNKEN LIAR KAREN A. DARNELL, SHE NEVER EVEN TRIED TO USE LUIS EWING’S AWESOME WINNING MOTIONS THAT WON MY FELONY ASSAULT CASE IN LOUISIANA, THE TRUTH IS THAT KAREN A. DARNELL CHICKENED OUT AND PLED GUILTY, END OF STORY PERIOD! – When I read this false report about Luis Ewing, I immediately knew this lady Karen Darnell was a liar so I contacted Luis Ewing to hear his version of her false story. The TRUTH is that KAREN DARNELL is a DRUNK DRIVER with A LONG HISTORY OF NUMEROUS DRUNK DRIVING OFFENSES and we all know that "severe alcoholics” like Karen A Darnell have absolutely NO CREDIBILITY. It’s easy to tell that KAREN DARNELL IS LYING because she did NOT provide the Court Case Cause Number in the Commonwealth of Kentucky District Court Division II, so I contacted Luis Ewing to get the actual case number so that I could verify and confirm for myself whether or NOT her claims were true or false and I discovered that Karen Darnell’s claims were false. The first thing that everyone should notice is the fact that this liar Karen Darnell did NOT provide you the Court Case Cause No. ____________, because she did NOT want you to find out that she is lying. The facts are that the court records and court files clearly show that Karen Darnell never even tried to use Luis Ewing’s awesome winning motions, she never even noted them up for a motions hearing because she "chickened out” and "got scared” of the judge. The court records and files clearly show that she pled guilty and never even tried to use Luis Ewing’s awesome winning motions. The judge in my case in Louisiana told me the same thing, that I could not represent myself, that if I could not afford to hire my own attorney that I would have to accept a public defender, but I stood my ground like Luis Ewing told me to, so how come I prevailed and won my Felony Assault Case? Karen A. Darnell’s case was a rinky dink Drunk Driving case and my case was a much more serious case for Felony Assault so how come I won my Felony Assault Case in Louisiana when my judge made the exact same threats to me that I could not represent myself? Luis Ewing’s written instructions for oral arguments are so easy to follow, especially "when you’re sober” and not "drunk” or "hung over in court”? I overcame my judge because I stood my ground so how can it be Luis Ewing’s fault if this liar Karen Darnell "chickened out” and "got scared” of the judge and just let the judge tell her what to do? It’s NOT Luis Ewing’s fault that this liar Karen A. Darnell is so gullible and just let the judge walk all over her because she "chickened out” and "got scared” of the judge. It’s easy to tell that this lady Karen Darnell is a liar because she didn’t give out her Court Case Cause No. ___________? I will provide you the info, here it is . . . "Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Karen A. Darnell, Cause No. 16-M--01435” . . ., so please call up the HARDIN CIRCUIT COURT CLERK AT THE HARDIN COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER, 120 EAST DIXIE AVENUE, ELIZABETH TOWN, KY 42701-1975, at telephone: 1 - (270) 766-5500, and Order a Certified Copy of the Court Docket No. 16-M--01435, and you will have . . . "CERTIFIED PROOF THAT KAREN A. DARNELL IS A LIAR” . . . because the "certified copy” of the court docket clearly shows that Karen Darnell NEVER even noted up Luis Ewing’s awesome winning motion for a motion hearing with oral arguments, KAREN DARNELL NEVER EVEN TRIED, KAREN A. DARNELL JUST PLED GUILTY! Karen A. Darnell: Telephone: 1 - (502) 544-7050 E-mail: