- Report: #592642
Complaint Review: mygenevawatch.com / Tom Slocum - Glendale, CALIFORNIA 91205 Internet
Reported By:
Marc -
Stafford, Virginia, United States of America
Submitted:
Updated:
-
Author Not Confirmed
Why?
mygenevawatch.com / Tom Slocum
511 E. Harvard St. Suite #5 Glendale, CALIFORNIA 91205, 91205 Internet, United States of America
Phone:
877-872-9911
Web:
www.mygenevawatch.com
Categories:
Business Rating:
(0)
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good?
mygenevawatch.com / Tom Slocum 511 E. Harvard St. Suite #5; Glendale, CA 91205 CO. charged citi-m/card-$94.98 & kept after I rept fraud-my info phish used by unk-I return-watch2-CO, Internet
my info seems to have been hacked/phished/by Unknown Subj.Co claims free trial subscript order by my email + credit card.Card stmt had Co charge $94.98. parcel from com 2 my mail. Wrote Refused/Return-2 Sender on 22 jan 2010. before today I never went to co site. article # sent & returned 420225569101148008600511385652.
I wrote to company to ask for a refund>. parcel returned to CO by USPS about 23 jan. my credit card charged $94.98. Sat, February 20, 2010 2:45:33 AM company RE: THANKYOU 4 CANCELLATION -PLEASE REFUND. Tom Slocum replied to my email. My email told him fraud made it seem as I was ordering a watch - I was never at his site. He presumed I was lying in order to keep nearly $100. They deposit perhaps millions from all the duped people who actually visit the site and obviously, from fraud victims like me. There intent is to keep as much money as possible for as long as possible. They earn and keep all they interest as there money. Slocum could not admit fraud ever resulted in people like me getting billed or else they would be obligated to return funds. They can't earn money they don't keep and deposit. The free watch offer is the enticement for the scam. Slocum also could not even acknowledge the watch was returned. Had he done so, he would also have to admit that the return is tantamount to a cancellation of the offer. With the return of the watch, even if it exceeded a certain number of days, would still be ethically compelled to revoke the agreement- if they were concerned about fairness in the first place. It was a scam, pure and simple, right from the outset!
