rsquirt
Phelan,#2Consumer Comment
Fri, January 08, 2010
in response to the report dated 12.12.2009 that the letter from weinstein & riley is to confirm a debt to NCA . as to the debt owed you will mark 0.00 that a copy of the receipt from the amount paid be included .that look for a letter of dispute on the internet and fill in the information as for account number adress and demand that the firm provides you with the information of the account that is now double
the point is that based on the rosenthal act they must provide information of the account which they do not have and or nca failed to clear the account .this attempt to collect is not nca it is first bank who won a law suit against nca thjat now the assets of nca belong to first bank and they are continuing in the same fashion nca collected debt aquired with unfair debt collection practice .
that i myself being a victim from such criminmal action by nca and now the attorneys for the court appointed receiver robb evans trying go collect the assets of nca .
that i am a victim of id theft and and my debt to nca is above 60.000.00 and the judgements were granted with only my name is the correct information.the account numbers are not related to the creditor that now weinstein & riley trying to collect .the retailer is not proper the amount owed is not the same as the amount of judgement granted.the letter to confirm the debt were responded with letters of dispute and if not responded with in 30 days and the failure to provide the demanded information to show proof that the debt owed to nca is true and valid the attorneys failed to respond to the dispute .that in the debt was paid a receipt should clear the obligation .if resource for a attorney are available then you should contact one ,they do not take such case on assigment they call it risky because no gurantee excist
getting hit from behind in a traffioc collition they will jump on the case ,here it takes work and the collection issues are not profitable
good luck