- Report: #220453
Complaint Review: Officezone Heavenlyoffice Xmission laminationplus Paper-cutter-store Generalgraphic - Kaysville Utah
-
Author Confirmed
Why?
Officezone Heavenlyoffice Xmission laminationplus Paper-cutter-store Generalgraphic
1142 West Flint Meadow Drive Kaysville, 84037 Utah, U.S.A.
Phone:
801-927-3026
Web:
N/A
Categories:
Business Rating:
(0)
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good?
Officezone, AKA Heavenlyoffice, AKA Xmission,AKA Laminationplus,AKA Paper-cutter-store, AKA Generalgraphic rasies the price after you order product. total scam Kaysville Utah
Below are a list of the same web pages run by a scam company.This company tries to raise the price after a sale -
http://www.officezone.com/ptrotar.htm
http://www.heavenlyoffice.com/ptrotar.htm
http://www.xmission.com/~ozone/ptrotar.htm
http://www.abcosolutions.com/ptrotar.htm
http://www.laminationplus.com/ptrotar.shtml
http://www.paper-cutter-store.com/ptrotar.htm
http://www.generalgraphic.com/ptrotar.htm
D
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
U.S.A.
http://www.officezone.com/ptrotar.htm
http://www.heavenlyoffice.com/ptrotar.htm
http://www.xmission.com/~ozone/ptrotar.htm
http://www.abcosolutions.com/ptrotar.htm
http://www.laminationplus.com/ptrotar.shtml
http://www.paper-cutter-store.com/ptrotar.htm
http://www.generalgraphic.com/ptrotar.htm
D
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
U.S.A.
1 Updates & Rebuttals
Phillip
Bountiful,Utah,
U.S.A.
Oh really?
#2Consumer Comment
Mon, October 22, 2007
I find this report questionable on several levels. First, of course is the date of the report. Nearly a year old, no follow up information or reports have been filed on this company/companies. Next is the broad nature of the accusations and the sparse nature of the evidence or information. Example, did they 'rip-off' the person specifically or did the filer simply receive a hearsay report from a friend or colleague? Did he/she have actual dealings with all of the listed entities to insure that the problem, if any, is general or endemic to the corporation as a whole? Was a pattern of policy ascribed to the entire corporate entity based on rancor over a single incident, that may or may not have been as serious as the person filing the report insists? I would like to stipulate that the report itself lacks merit because it makes broad, overly general accusations and provides no details to support the accusations what so ever!! It's like saying, "Those people are bad!" It doesn't really mean anything he/she provides no details or instances of said people being 'bad'. Lol!
