;
  • Report:  #54792

Complaint Review: Princeton Law Firm - My Credit Firm - Salt Lake City Utah

Reported By:
- Bullhead City, Arizona,
Submitted:
Updated:

Princeton Law Firm - My Credit Firm
2825 East Cottonwood Pkwy, Suite 500 Salt Lake City, 84121 Utah, U.S.A.
Phone:
866-329-9704
Web:
N/A
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good? What's this?
Princeton Law Firm said they could remove all bad/poor credit from my credit history. They forged documents from my creditors stating the negative information was to be removed from my credit reports. They sent me these letters stating that all I had to do was wait for the information to be removed. As they had been sent to the credit bureau.

The information never came off my report. When I contacted the credit bureau they informed me they never received such dispute. I contacted my creditors and was told the letters I had were "fake" "forged" That they would never send such a letter. When I contacted Princeton Law Firm, Mr. Glenn Wright said he would look into it that it must have been a disgruntled employee who sent him these letters. I requested a refund of my money. I was told he would speak to his attorney and return my call. He never did.

Marshall

Bullhead City, Arizona
U.S.A.


1 Updates & Rebuttals

Princeton Law Firm

Salt Lake City,
Utah,
United States of America
False Claim

#2UPDATE Employee

Wed, January 12, 2011

This gentleman raises some issues which do not sound entirely credible but occurred during a prior ownership in any event and none of the persons then working for the company any longer do so. The claims are based on hearsay of what this person says other people said but has no supporting actual facts. Even back then this sort of event of "forged" letters simply could not have occurred. Princeton has always had a full refund policy for people desiring to terminate service. We have a proven track record of successfully disputing inaccuracies on credit reports which thereby improves credit scores. This notion of some sort of letter from a creditor which someone says was forged does not really make sense and does correspond with any procedure ever used by the current owners or any prior owner of the firm. If it was purported to be from a creditor, why would he think he it came from someone in Princeton's office? That does not really make sense. At the bottom line, even if what Mr. Wright (who was not an operating employee of the firm but an accountant) stated was accurate (and this seems unlikely itself), Princeton then and now has always had a full refund policy.

Reports & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
Also a victim?
Repair Your Reputation!
//