Barbara
ewing,#2Author of original report
Mon, January 17, 2005
The Department of Consumer Protection notified me that Mr. Lesslie said there was metal debris in the yard and a hedge and so he could not see the boundary of my property and therefore, he is not responsible for missing the illegal well on my property. Surveyors in NJ are not required to check the boundary lines of property for home buyers if there is anything on the boundary line like a hedge. There was no metal debris in a flat yard, with a walk way between two houses. The only item on the boundary was a hedge with a wire fence behind it. The fence was very old but not debris. The well was on the boundary with the fence and in plain sight. The Department of Consumer Protection did not find it important the the fence is on my survey although the only way to see the fence is to go behind the hedge. Further, the Department did not find it important that the surveyor did not put out markers which I requested, a violation of state law and they did not find it pertinent that I had contracted with a Mr. Johnson to do my survey and not Mr. Lesslie. I asked the Department to find out who hired Mr. Lesslie and that was not important. It was not important that I, as a home buyer, was told I had an underground well next to the kitchen and it turned out that I had an illegal above-ground well. The information given to my home inspector was false and we were not able to evaluate the real well. AT closing, as is claimed the the NJ Society of Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors on their website, one should have an accurate survey to protect buyers from misrepresentation by land surveyors. The Society states that the surveyor will check historical records and public records and do research and help buyers from making costly mistakes. The Department of Consumer Affairs appears to be saying that this is not the purpose of a surveyor and that it is not relevant that a buyer would hire a land surveyor to help them determine the condition of their property if the land surveyor decides he does not want to check the bounary. But, he did check the boundary because he put the hedge and the fence on the survey. Therefore, the Department of Consumer Affairs simply ignored the question as to why the well was not put on the survey, and why Mr. Lesslie did not check public records. The title search available to Mr. Lesslie states the home has a private well. Mr. Lesslie told me he thought I had City water. The Department of Consumer Affairs also added that Mr. Lesslie used a crew. I suspect Mr. Lesslie's crew missed the well and that I, as the consumer in this matter, is to endure the loss of the value of my home because Mr. Lesslie was too lazy to look at the boundary himself. I had requested of Mr. Johnson to be at the survey since I had already seen the bad effects of insect inspections and those trying to sell really bad houses to women like myself, first time home buyers. I believe the reason that Mr. Johnson did not do the inspection was because he did not want to have the consumer at the survey. Mr. Lesslie got into the picture and, as I suspected, used someone else like a student (crew) to do a survey on a small lot in the City. This is not a hudge project and it is really irresponsible for the Department of Consumer Affairs to simply discount that a professional surveyor did not do his job -- which is obvious -- and tell me, the consumer "touch luck."