;
  • Report:  #559991

Complaint Review: Sanford Pollack - Lincoln Nebraska

Reported By:
Ripped Off - Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
Submitted:
Updated:

Sanford Pollack
1003 H Street, Lincoln Nebraska 68508 Lincoln, 68508 Nebraska, United States of America
Phone:
402-476-7474
Web:
Categories:
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good? What's this?

Unprofessional, Standard of service is below that of an average educated attorney, He will not help you with a defense, His appeals have no merit, then filed in (Unpublished opinions) because he will not argue constitutional violations or arguments with merit on your appeal. He is a waste of good money! He will ruin your chances of success in the Nebraska legal system!!!!!!



5 Updates & Rebuttals

Lincoln

Lincoln,
Nebraska,
United States
2022 Updated Lost cases

#2Consumer Comment

Wed, March 09, 2022

State v. Mrza 926 NW 2d 79, 302 Neb. 931 - Neb: Supreme Court, 2019 - Google Scholar … Affirmed. Sanford J. Pollack, of Pollack & Ball, LLC, Lincoln, for appellant. Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Kimberly A. Klein, Lincoln, for appellee … Court, “no merit to the assignments of error” Appeal Lost

State v. Mohammed Neb: Court of Appeals, 2018 - Google Scholar … Affirmed. Sanford J. Pollack, of Pollack & Ball, LLC, for appellant. Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Kimberly A. Klein for appellee. RIEDMANN, BISHOP, and WELCH, Judges … Court, “Sexual advances and assaults on minor children are serious offenses.” Must not of been to serious! {Pollack Appeal Lost} Thanks to a Lancaster district court judge Mohammed was discharged from parole after only 4 years. Did Mohammed really think Pollack would win this appeal? Just put the money in your bank account call it good.

State v. Carter Neb: Court of Appeals, 2019 - Google Scholar … Judge. Affirmed. Sanford J. Pollack, of Pollack & Ball, LLC, for appellant. Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Matthew Lewis, for appellee. MOORE … Court, “Finding no error in the district court's denial of the motion to transfer to juvenile court, we affirm.” Appeal Lost

State v. Moreno 947 NW 2d 330, 28 Neb. App. 581 - Neb: Court of Appeals, 2020 - Google Scholar … Affirmed. Sanford J. Pollack, Lincoln, of Pollack & Ball, LLC, for appellant. Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Siobhan E. Duffy, Lincoln, for appellee … Court, ”….. sound basis for retaining Moreno's case in district court.” Appeal Lost

 


Annoyed

Lincoln,
Nebraska,
United States
Sandford Pollack, Pollack & Ball

#3Consumer Comment

Wed, December 13, 2017

IN RE INTEREST OF SEBASTIAN D., Neb: Court of Appeals, Filed April 26, 2016,  Sanford J. Pollack, of Pollack & Ball, L.L.C., for appellant.  Assignment of error is without merit. The juvenile court did not err in adjudicating Lillian-Jo as a child within the meaning of § 43-247(3)(a).  LOST


Consumer

Nebraska,
USA
Published Lost cases 2015 Pollack & Ball

#4Consumer Comment

Thu, January 14, 2016

IN RE INTEREST OF GAVIN S.

23 Neb. App. 401 - Neb: Court of Appeals, 2015 - Sanford J. Pollack, of Pollack & Ball, L.L.C., for appellee Daniel S. Court finding that clear and convincing evidence shows that termination of Lacy's and Daniel's parental rights is in the children's best interests. Sanford Pollack waste of money time Lost.

 

 

IN RE INTEREST OF CASSANDRA B.

290 Neb. 619 - Neb: Supreme Court, 2015 - John C. Ball, of Pollack & Ball, LLC, for appellant. Joe Kelly. Prior court ordered that temporary legal and physical custody of both children should remain with Nebraska's Department of Health and Human Services. She appeals from an order of the separate juvenile court of Lancaster County prohibiting her from homeschooling Moira until further order of the court. John Ball waste of money time Lost.
 

These are only the published lost cases. Many Lost cases in Nebraska go unpublish hidden from the public.

Report Attachments

Lincoln Resident

Lincoln,
Nebraska,
USA
More lost cases, what a waste of time and money!

#5Consumer Comment

Tue, July 03, 2012

State v. Dunkin, 283 Neb. 30 - Neb: Supreme Court, 2012-  Sanford Pollack Postconviction appeal.  Lost

IN RE INTEREST OF JAY S, Neb: Court of Appeals, 2011- Sanford Pollack Clients lose parental rights, control. Lost

IN RE INTEREST OF ELIZABETH S., 282 Neb. 1015 - Neb: Supreme Court 2012- Sanford Pollack Clients parental rights terminated and affirmed. Lost


Omaha,
Nebraska,
USA
Incompetent Representation

#6Author of original report

Tue, October 18, 2011

Sanford J Pollack, Pollack @ Ball,  this is the type of services you will recieve. State v. Biggs, 2001 NE 90 Sanford Pollack refused to file an appeal for client.  Appeals Court rules client can't prove it.

 McCray v. Pollack, 2002 NE 181, Legal malpractise claim against Sanford Pollack. Court rules McCray failed to present expert testimony on his behalf. ( Fact, If a lawyer screws your case up, you will have a hard time finding another attorney to take the stand and say so.

 State v. Conrad, 2003 NE 61, Sanford Pollack represents Appellant on Appeal, his appeal has no merit. Lost

State v. Feldhacker, 11 Neb App 872, Sanford Pollack represents Appellant on Appeal, briefs don't comply with Neb. Supreme Court rules, his appeal has no merit. Lost

In re Interest of Sarah L, 758 N.W 2d 48, John Ball of Pollack @ Ball for Appeallant, appeal Lost.

Sanford Pollack is an expert at screwing clients cases up. Counties appoint this lawyer for that specific reason, to screw your case up, to argue meritless claims on appeal, even if you have claims that could win, he will lose. Most of his cases are keep in unpublished opinions. Do your research!

He and his law office make a living off the system. NOT by helping clients. He knows how to screw your case up and get away with it, he's had years of experience. Don't make the mistake of hiring this law office, your throwing money away, if your oppointed this attorney they appointed him to make sure you lose.

Search for additional reports

Reports & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
Also a victim?
Repair Your Reputation!
//