;
  • Report:  #1165514

Complaint Review: Seeker Fishing Rod Company - Oxnard California

Reported By:
Ryan Dolan - San diego, California,
Submitted:
Updated:

Seeker Fishing Rod Company
900 Graves Ave Oxnard, 93030 California, USA
Phone:
800-373-3537
Web:
Seekerrods.com
Categories:
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good? What's this?

I purchased a Seeker Fishing Rod from Turners at the Fred Hall Boat Show in San Diego, CA in March of 2014 for roughly $180.  I took the pole fishing for the first time in June 2014.  I went to cast the pole for the first time and it made a popping noise and the lure didnt go anywhere.  I looked at the pole and it had popped open and broke right below the bottom eye.  I contacted Turners and they instructed me to contact one of the owners named Eric Maulhardt, and they gave me his email address.  I emailed Eric and he instructed me to send the pole in and that they would replace it, please read the emails:

Ryan,

I am sorry about the rod breaking.  Every now and then we have defective fiberglass or workmanship.  Please send the rod back to us at 900 Graves Avenue, Oxnard, CA 93030.  We will get you a new one.  Please include youe name, address and phone number in the box.

Again, I apologize for the inconvenience.

Eric

On Jun 20, 2014, at 2:07 PM, Ryan Dola wrote:

> I was at the Fred Hall boat show a few months ago and picked up a Seeker fishing pole from Turners after stopping at the Seeker Boothe to get a recommendation of which pole to buy for the reel that I purchased. Long story short, I took it out a few days ago and went to cast it for the first time and it exploded below the bottom eye. The pole is completely shot now. I don't know why this happened,  I have never had problems with a Seeker before.  I was told by Turners that I need to send it into you guys to get a replacement.  Can you send me all of the info I will need. I did not keep the receipt or anything, but I know the guys at Turners and they know that they sold it to me, I can dig up my credit card bill if I absolutely need to. 

A week or so later I went to the post office to send the pole as instructed by Eric.  The Post Office only had a smaller box that would fit only the bottom half of the pole so I emailed Eric to ask if he needed the entire pole or if it was OK if I only send the small portion.  Below is the email transaction:

Eric I just went to the post office and the only box that would fit this pole will only fit the bottom half of the broken pole. I could either 1) send just the bottom or 2) break the top half into a 3rd piece so it will fit in the box. Let me know.

ERIC MAULHARDT

Jul 7
 
   
to me
 
 
 
 
 
Ryan,
 
Send the broken section, please.
 
Now I do not see anything here that states that he needed me to send the entire pole (its almost 8' and I dont know where I would get a box for it).  At this point I seperated the rod at the break point and shipped the bottom half to Seeker.  They received the bottom half and then Eric handed the problem off to a guy named Jason Hawes who I guess works in shipping.  Jason informed me that he could offer me a rod for 1/2 price.  I told him that I should get a new one at no cost as originally promised because the rod broke on my first cast.  Then Jason states that I do not qualify for a free replacement because I was supposed to send the entire rod in so that they could assess the damage and decide if it was a factory defect or not.  This makes sense but the question is: Why when I asked Eric if I should break the rod in half so it could fit in the box, why did he say "Send the broken half".  What does that mean?  If he would have said to send the whole thing I would have done it.  So they used that as an excuse not to replace one of their poles that literally did not even last one cast.  They gave me the run around, and now I am out the entire cost of the pole, AND the shipping that I spent to send it back to Seeker after Eric said he was going to replace it.  Needless to say I will never be buying a Seeker again!  Below is the entire email string:
 

 

     
to me
 
 
 

I JUST SPOKE WITH THE OWNER ERIC. HE TOLD ME THAT WE WOULD HAVE NEEDED TO SEE THE WHOLE ROD BEFORE YOU BROKE IT THAT WAY WE COULD HAVE INSPECTGED THE SLINTERING ROD.. UNFORTUNATLY BOTH ENDS OF THE ROD NEEDED TO BE INSPECTED. 

 



5 Updates & Rebuttals

fishmeluck

Long Beach,
California,
USA
Not a Rip-Off

#2Consumer Comment

Sun, February 26, 2017

Seeker is a leading fishing rod manufacturer in Southern California. I own and use several of their rods, and can vouch for them being high quality products. Seeker also provides excellent customer service. The reported problem sounds like a misunderstanding to me, but not by Seeker.

When you asked Seeker if you could break the rod in half so it would fit in the box and Seeker told you to "Send in the broken half", Seeker obviously meant that you should send in the two pieces of the upper half of the rod. You did say that it was the tip of the rod that you broke on the first cast, and obviously Seeker would want to look at the tip and the section just below it, to see how the rod might have broken. Or, you could have just sent in all three pieces, but I can't imagine why you would think Seeker would want the lower half!

Also, "Jason in shipping" probably expects to see whole rods come in, not half a rod. If you had sent in the upper half of the rod, you could probably have worked things out, seeing as how the owner told you to send in the broken half. But really, common sense suggests you should have known what half of the rod Seeker wanted to look at.


Dave

Newport Beach,
California,
USA
Rod Replacement

#3Consumer Suggestion

Mon, September 07, 2015

Seeker should authorize its retailers to take returns.  Turners should be able to tell if the damage was caused by a flaw in their manufacturing process, or by consumer neglect.  If a retailer cannot tell if the damage was caused by a manufacturing process then Seeker should teach them.  Shipping is another matter.  Therefore, on borderline cases the retailer should communicate directly with Seeker for a final determination.  

Car windows are responsible for a lot of broken rods, as well as big fish causing a rod to hit the rail. That is not the manufacturers fault.

In the end the manufacture and retailer's goal should be to have satisfied customers.  They should go out of their way to insure customer satisfaction. Total customer satisfaction is in their best long-term interest.  On the other hand, there are people that try to abuse the system.  I'm not in a position to judge this case, but want to identify possible solution(s) to avoid further problems.  

1.  If the consumer was able to return the rod to the retailer, the retailer could have determined the cause of damage and resolved the matter.  

2.  If the consumer was on a cattle boat, the Captain could have determined the cause; or if the consumer was went out of a landing, the landing tackle shop could have made the call and this information could have been passed along to Seeker or its retailer.

3.  If the consumer was not close to any Seeker retailer or Seeker facility, Seeker could have requested the consumer to email photos of the broken rod with close up photos of the area where the break occurred.  

Seeker is a reputable company, unfortunately, manufacturing flaws occur, and there are people that will try to abuse the system.  Seeker should have a clear written protocol to be followed.  Perhaps one should be added to their website if one does not exist. 

Bottom line, if I were Seeker or the retailer, I would want to error on the side of the consumer, unless there was clear evidence the consumer was taking advantage of Seeker.  It is sad this incident reached this point, especially, if the consumer is telling the truth.


Diego Sanchez

Chicago,
Illinois,
WOW TYG

#4General Comment

Tue, July 29, 2014

I definately see a rip off here.  Hey TYG, your post is offensive, I wonder if you would talk like that in a face to face situation?  The owner did not say anything about the rod having to be evaluated, in fact he made it seem very easy, and hassle free to get a replacement.  Thats what I got from reading the email anyways.  You shouldnt have to go out of your way to fix a problem that you did not cause.  You were proactive and did the right thing to post it here.  I dont fish, but if I did I would not consider this company, thanks for the post.


Ryan Dolan

San diego,
California,
what?

#5Author of original report

Mon, July 28, 2014

Do you not see where he said "send the broken half". I work 10 hour days, don't have time to go around looking all over for boxes. A multi million dollar company should replace a rod that breaks on the first cast. And also shouldn't a company offer to pay for shipping since it is their fault I have to ship it? Are you sure you don't work for the company? 


Tyg

Pahrump,
Nevada,
How???

#6General Comment

Mon, July 28, 2014

 How exactly is this in ANY WAY their fault?? Seems pretty easy to understand. They said send in the broken piece. One would think that YOU as a functioning adult would understand just by looking at your fishing pole which was the broken part. Its YOUR laziness that has caused this issue for you. All YOU had to do was find a box measuring roughly 4 feet and you could have sent the pole in. BUT!!!!! YOU did not do this. YOU scapegoat the post office and say THAT is all they had. Did you ever think to MAYBE go to a place that SELLS BOXES???? I happen to KNOW that UPS sells 5ft tubes. No, you made the BIGGEST mistake you can. YOU chose a CHEAPER form of shipping and DID NOT go beyond that. When THEY deny your claim because YOU did NOT send in everything needed, THEY are the badguys because YOU are too ignorant to figure out "Send in the broken piece". AND too cheap to go outside your little box and go to someone else to ship it. You can stop playing the victim ANYTIME!!! Ok we get it, your fishing pole failed. All that was asked of YOU was to send it in to them. YOU DID NOT DO THIS!!!!! So how in ANY stretch of the imagination can you sit there and bash them for what is YOUR FAULT???? It always amazes me at EXACTLY how dumb people like YOU are. YOU were given a simple set of instructions and you screwed that up. Perhaps you should be looking in the mirror here instead of bashing a company because YOU couldn't follow directions. The GREAT thing is that if THEY don't like what amounts to your fanciful story they can sue you for it. All YOU have done is show the entire web going public that YOU cannot follow directions and in turn bash innocent parties for your ignorance. Since the web by definition is a media outlet, what you have done can get you into a buttload of trouble. Not the grab your ankles cause your cellmate wishes to greet you, but definatly in the Im going to pay for this for awhile category. It may be only a civil suit, but its STILL a crime. YOU cannot use the web in this manner. Its NOT about YOUR freedom of speech, it IS about accepting responsibility for YOUR actions and being INNOCENT until proven guilty. People like YOU tend to think THEIR rights are above everyone elses. Remember.....WE ARE ALL EQUAL!!!!! and he instructed me to send the pole in and that they would replace it, ..........right there in black and white is the instructions that YOU chose to circumvent. The Post Office only had a smaller box that would fit only the bottom half of the pole ........which means that YOU stopped there and since the post office did not have the size you needed it MUST be their fault. All you had to do was go to another post office or a mailbox store or a UPS or a FEDEX. Once again the American Consumer seeks to blame others for THEIR issues. NO RIPOFF HERE!!!! Just someone who couldn't or wouldn't follow the directions given to them and places a ton of excuses out there as to WHY its not their fault.

Reports & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
Also a victim?
Repair Your Reputation!
//