Robert
Buffalo,#2Consumer Comment
Thu, June 05, 2008
I didn't believe your report as it was written. The faxing to the court explains things. Good luck with the other stuff.
Echo434
San Antonio,#3Author of original report
Thu, June 05, 2008
Sorry I thought I had mentioned that. I guess was just overly excited that I had actually fought them and won. On to the next one, Asset Acceptanct and windstream communications.
Robert
Buffalo,#4Consumer Comment
Wed, June 04, 2008
I'm glad you were able to get it fixed so quickly. I knew something was missing - you faxed the documents to the court. Your report didn't indicate that. Seems to me the judge decided to reverse himself/herself- glad to learn that!
Echo434
San Antonio,#5Author of original report
Wed, June 04, 2008
I had documents to show the origional date of the debt, I faxed those to the judge. And they didnt mail me the documents back they faxed them. They dismissed them, they were illegally garnishing my wages. Believe it or not, I dont much care. Its off my credit report and I got my money back they took.
Robert
Buffalo,#6Consumer Comment
Wed, June 04, 2008
Let's see. To garnish wages, there has to first be a successful lawsuit followed up with an enforcement order (usually after a substantial period of time whereas the money judgement is not satisfied.) It seems very doubtful to me that ANY judge would vacate or "dismiss" a judgment based on a HEARSAY telephone call. Judgments cannot be dismissed; they may be vacated or stayed, but not dismissed. It is also very unlikely that a letter would have been received the next day. The USPS is not normally that quick. Gotta wonder what is the real story.