coast
USA#2Consumer Comment
Wed, October 10, 2012
You are correct; the car was not purchased there. I made an error.
Philip Seldon
New York,#3Author of original report
Wed, October 10, 2012
The judge's knowledge of the law also appeared to be deficient - she completely disregarded the testimony of the expert witness who testified that the age of the car had nothing to do with the transmission blowing up and that the transmission had been recently been rebuilt.
Also, the expert testified in detail exactly how the high 2500 idle speed caused the transmission to blow up explaining in detail how it caused the pump to increase presure on the torque converter, etc. He testified that Uptown Motors was negligent and was completely at fault.
The judge was required to accept the testimony of the expert and find in my favor but she disregarded the expert and went on her own misguided opinion that the car was old, etc.
I will be filing a judicial complaint against this judge when I have the time to do this as her total disregard of the expert who she qualified as an expert clearly was judicial misconduct.
While I lost in court, this RipOffReport.com forum provides for justice. There are many Google Reviews that complain about Uptown Motors and I will be reposting them on this website for all to see so that they will know to AVOID UPTOWN MOTORS AT ALL COSTS.
BEWARE OF UPTOWN MOTORS AND ANDY BUCZEK
Niko234
Alexandria,#4Consumer Comment
Wed, October 10, 2012
First, that car is a classic and the OP said he took to the business to have it serviced. He DID NOT buy the car from there. You obviously have little knowledge of the repair business and how it works. This mans claims sound completely legitimate. The owner of the company in question clearly performed faulty work and deserved to be sued. Now the comment about the judge well, that may be a little extreme. As a mechanic he is bound to follow what the customer would like done. They may make suggestions however, they are supposed to do what the customer orders. Clearly this guy was out to make a quick buck on the back of a hard working person. No where does it say that this person bought the car from this business. It is a repair facility NOT a car dealership. Troll somewhere else or pick up a book and learn a thing or two about car repair. To the original poster you were ripped off, sorry about the outcome of the trial.
The Outlaw Josey Wales
Golden Meadow,#5Consumer Comment
Wed, October 10, 2012
koast has done it again, useless rebutt
coast
USA#6Consumer Comment
Wed, October 10, 2012
"the judge who was a woman with no knowledge of cars" Her knowledge of the law (not her gender) was a factor. I'm sure she reminded you that you agreed to a final sale on an AS-IS purchase. Why didn't you mention that in your report? How many miles did you road test the 51-year-old car?