Jason
london,#2Consumer Comment
Thu, March 16, 2017
Jason
london,#3Consumer Comment
Tue, March 14, 2017
Karen
Birmingham,#4REBUTTAL Individual responds
Mon, October 31, 2005
I still have all of the correspondence that took place between myself and Robert of NY. I certainly did reply to each and every one of his questions and concerns. In our correspondence, Robert from NY revealed that he had purchased $7000 worth of inventory from a company called "IMG" and felt he had been 'ripped off' by that company. I'm not quite sure why he chose to write a rip off report about Wade World Trade as we have nothing to do with IMG. When Robert asked if Wade World Trade was affiliated in anyway with IMG I assured him in very plain language more than once that we are not affiliated nor have we ever been, with IMG or any other company. Wade World Trade has always been Wade World Trade and has never been affiliated with any other corporation. In the report to this website, Robert of NY complains that when he phoned two people listed on the Wade Trade website as Wade Trade agents, the people he contacted didn't know what he was talking about. As we clearly state on our website and as I clearly stated in an email to Robert of NY, we protect our clients' privacy by changing their names. This is something that is routinely done and completely ethical. It would be unacceptable to put our clients private information such as name, address and telephone numbers in our advertising. I have on record all of the correspondence that took place between Robert of NY and Wade World Trade (both UK and US offices)and will be glad to share it with anyone who has any doubts about Wade World Trade. While I understand Robert's frustration in dealing with IMG, I fail to understand how he could make such libelous statements about Wade World Trade.
Karen
Birmingham,#5REBUTTAL Individual responds
Mon, October 31, 2005
I still have all of the correspondence that took place between myself and Robert of NY. I certainly did reply to each and every one of his questions and concerns. In our correspondence, Robert from NY revealed that he had purchased $7000 worth of inventory from a company called "IMG" and felt he had been 'ripped off' by that company. I'm not quite sure why he chose to write a rip off report about Wade World Trade as we have nothing to do with IMG. When Robert asked if Wade World Trade was affiliated in anyway with IMG I assured him in very plain language more than once that we are not affiliated nor have we ever been, with IMG or any other company. Wade World Trade has always been Wade World Trade and has never been affiliated with any other corporation. In the report to this website, Robert of NY complains that when he phoned two people listed on the Wade Trade website as Wade Trade agents, the people he contacted didn't know what he was talking about. As we clearly state on our website and as I clearly stated in an email to Robert of NY, we protect our clients' privacy by changing their names. This is something that is routinely done and completely ethical. It would be unacceptable to put our clients private information such as name, address and telephone numbers in our advertising. I have on record all of the correspondence that took place between Robert of NY and Wade World Trade (both UK and US offices)and will be glad to share it with anyone who has any doubts about Wade World Trade. While I understand Robert's frustration in dealing with IMG, I fail to understand how he could make such libelous statements about Wade World Trade.