I was in my dissertation stage when Walden removed me from the program. They asked that I write a letter for re-entry and I did - I was never notified of the reason for not being able to get back into the Program. In fact, I had to keep emailing the Academic Advising Counselor who was working with me before he was able to find a letter in which he said was mailed to me, I found that to be interesting since the letter never arrived here at my house. But when I asked for the reason for denial of re-entry into the program - No one ever got back to me.
The Academic Advising Supervisor told me to get one of my Professors to write me a letter. I told her that wasn't one of the requirements for re-entry. Walden took my years of payment and time spent on my Ph.D. and gave me nothing. I have a big student loan and nothing for it... but Walden has now more professor and larger base and because of mine and other funds.
mouse
Missouri,#2Consumer Comment
Mon, November 26, 2018
Judge Not:
Walden screwed me over financially and time wise. She or he probably doesn't have the answers for many reasons. Don't blame the victim unless YOU TOO have all of the facts.
Chaiya
Virginia,#3Consumer Comment
Tue, June 26, 2018
I have a higher expectation for the report quality from someone who is (or was) in a Ph.D. program. Your report, however, is unclear but rather a rant.
First, you did not tell the reader why you were removed from the program in the first place. The removal reason may shed some lights to why they denied the re-entry. Second, the first AAC should have been able to tell you the reason if the person found the letter. He claimed to "send" you a "physical" letter, so it is very likely that he has seen its content. I don't believe that a letter is already printed and put inside an envelope when he found it (too odd). Why didn't you ask for the reason right there and then? Third, from your report, the first AAC and the second AAC are different persons (the first is he and the second is she). Couldn't you keep in touch with the first AAC? Last, why couldn't you get a letter from your professor when the second AAC asked you to do? It shouldn't be a problem at all regardless your knowledge of requirements. However, for this last question reason, then it goes back to the first question -- why were you removed from the program?
Your report is not a report at all but rather a kind of rant. With your education level, you should have known better that writing a report like this requires you to prove what you claim/accuse. I have no doubt that the uinversity does something wrong, but the burden is on you to prove it. If no further information of your proof, then this is not a report.