#20
Fri, September 13, 2002
Shortly after I filed this report I contacted Experian, the Office of the Comptroller of Currencies, one of my attornies and a representative of the Department of Justice. Needless to say, I've learned a few things in the process.
The rebuttal to my original report does not immediately address the actual complaint and is likely intended to distract the reader from the real issue, being misrepresentation on behalf of Wells Fargo. Don't be mislead. It is entirely possible that due to the absence of original paperwork, Wells Fargo has the ability to change crucial information and record it as fact, which can be used against you. The rebuttal states "It's a cost issue". What does that tell you about Wells Fargo? Never mind why they don't keep originals or the Federal regulations supporting it. The bottom line is they destroy original credit card apps. The rebuttal itself is further substantiation that this is true.
I have also been advised that without original documentation, (a national bank) will probably not take a similar case to court - so keep that in mind if you're in a situation where questions over who the guarantor on the account is comes up. One response might be to couter-sue for fraud. In my case, they tried to intimidate me. I recorded all the calls and transcripts are being sent to the OCC along with my complaint.
A few days after I contacted the OCC, et al, my wife received a call at home from Wells Fargo. It was a woman I had spoken to previously who accused me of withholding information with intent to sue Wells Fargo. She told my wife they have taken my name off of the account, informed her that I was never a guarantor and will be contacting all of the credit reporting agencies to remove the report from my credit history.
I contacted her myself and she agreed to send me, within fifteen days, a letter indicating I was never a guarantor on the acount. Again, the call was taped, along with that incredible contradiction.
So you see, if you let them push you around, they will. If you stand up to them, you may be surprised, as I have been, that the Feds are genuinely interested in questionable banking practices and will assist you if you are willing to deliver adequate substantiation of the facts.
Scott
walnut creek,#3UPDATE Employee
Fri, September 06, 2002
Sir, Federal Regulation, Regulations B,Z,M allow financial institutions to keep electronic copies of documents instead of originals. Financial Insitutions are required to retain evidence that all Federal disclosures have been made to the customer. Although the actual record retention requirements for Federal Regulations as far as the length of time required to keep evidence differs slightly among the regulations but it is generally 2 years.
It's a cost issue.... The cost of retaining electronic copies of documents is far less then keeping paper copies.