Complaint Review: William Alan Montgomery Aka Bill Montgomery Aka Bryan Kos - Burlington Ontario

I would like to respond to Mr. Montgomery's rebuttal. On November 14, 2002, judgement was given to the Plaintiff, my son Nathan in the amount of $10,000. plus pre and post judgement interest, costs, and an amount for inconvenience. $10,000 is the maximum one can claim in small claims court or the judgement would have been much higher. The total that Mr. Montgomery now owes our son is over $13,100. Mr. Montgomery's denial of this judgement is based on the fact that he has filed 2 motions attempting to get the judgement overturned. It is inaccurate to say that this matter has not been heard. A judgement and assessment is recorded. On March 4/03 a judge of the Toronto Small Claims Court adjourned our Examination hearing to allow for Mr. Montgomery's motion. Mr. Montgomery, did not attend his own motion and so on April 29/03 we were once again present for an Examination hearing. For anyone not familiar with the process, Examination hearings are held after a judgement is given in favour of the Plaintiff (usually), for the purpose of the Plaintiff being allowed to question the defendant under oath as to his assets. That fact that we have had several Examination dates indicates that we do indeed have a judgement. Also on April 29/03, Mr. Montgomery was cited with contempt of court by the judge. His hearing for this is on July 29/03 @6:30 p.m. at Toronto Small Claims Court at 47 Sheppard Ave. At this hearing I understand that Mr. Montgomery will be given one final opportunity so answer our Examination questions. Finally, it is true that Mr. Montgomery has filed a second motion for the same purpose as the first one. We don't expect he will win this especially if he once again chooses to be absent. Mr. Montgomery has admitted that he was taken to Small Claims Court by a lawyer for not paying his bill. He subsequently paid according to him $500. which would indicate that the suit was settled in favour of the lawyer. My earlier comments about this therefore, are just. Incidently, the copy of the invoice that I have from this lawyer showed a balance of $1,934.89. Mr. Montgomery's defence indicated that he admitted to $674. not $500. In any case, he does have this judgement against him as well as our own. I also stand by my comments that Mr. Montgomery coerced and threatened my son. Mr. Montgomery has been discredited in a court of law. That's all I have to say on the matter. It is my hope that anyone dealing with this man in the future will be cautious. We would appreciate any information that anyone can provide on this man's assets that could help us collect on our son's judgement. Please contact us at: (905) 681-2453.

I would like to respond to Mr. Montgomery's rebuttal. On November 14, 2002, judgement was given to the Plaintiff, my son Nathan in the amount of $10,000. plus pre and post judgement interest, costs, and an amount for inconvenience. $10,000 is the maximum one can claim in small claims court or the judgement would have been much higher. The total that Mr. Montgomery now owes our son is over $13,100. Mr. Montgomery's denial of this judgement is based on the fact that he has filed 2 motions attempting to get the judgement overturned. It is inaccurate to say that this matter has not been heard. A judgement and assessment is recorded. On March 4/03 a judge of the Toronto Small Claims Court adjourned our Examination hearing to allow for Mr. Montgomery's motion. Mr. Montgomery, did not attend his own motion and so on April 29/03 we were once again present for an Examination hearing. For anyone not familiar with the process, Examination hearings are held after a judgement is given in favour of the Plaintiff (usually), for the purpose of the Plaintiff being allowed to question the defendant under oath as to his assets. That fact that we have had several Examination dates indicates that we do indeed have a judgement. Also on April 29/03, Mr. Montgomery was cited with contempt of court by the judge. His hearing for this is on July 29/03 @6:30 p.m. at Toronto Small Claims Court at 47 Sheppard Ave. At this hearing I understand that Mr. Montgomery will be given one final opportunity so answer our Examination questions. Finally, it is true that Mr. Montgomery has filed a second motion for the same purpose as the first one. We don't expect he will win this especially if he once again chooses to be absent. Mr. Montgomery has admitted that he was taken to Small Claims Court by a lawyer for not paying his bill. He subsequently paid according to him $500. which would indicate that the suit was settled in favour of the lawyer. My earlier comments about this therefore, are just. Incidently, the copy of the invoice that I have from this lawyer showed a balance of $1,934.89. Mr. Montgomery's defence indicated that he admitted to $674. not $500. In any case, he does have this judgement against him as well as our own. I also stand by my comments that Mr. Montgomery coerced and threatened my son. Mr. Montgomery has been discredited in a court of law. That's all I have to say on the matter. It is my hope that anyone dealing with this man in the future will be cautious. We would appreciate any information that anyone can provide on this man's assets that could help us collect on our son's judgement. Please contact us at: (905) 681-2453.

I would like to respond to Mr. Montgomery's rebuttal. On November 14, 2002, judgement was given to the Plaintiff, my son Nathan in the amount of $10,000. plus pre and post judgement interest, costs, and an amount for inconvenience. $10,000 is the maximum one can claim in small claims court or the judgement would have been much higher. The total that Mr. Montgomery now owes our son is over $13,100. Mr. Montgomery's denial of this judgement is based on the fact that he has filed 2 motions attempting to get the judgement overturned. It is inaccurate to say that this matter has not been heard. A judgement and assessment is recorded. On March 4/03 a judge of the Toronto Small Claims Court adjourned our Examination hearing to allow for Mr. Montgomery's motion. Mr. Montgomery, did not attend his own motion and so on April 29/03 we were once again present for an Examination hearing. For anyone not familiar with the process, Examination hearings are held after a judgement is given in favour of the Plaintiff (usually), for the purpose of the Plaintiff being allowed to question the defendant under oath as to his assets. That fact that we have had several Examination dates indicates that we do indeed have a judgement. Also on April 29/03, Mr. Montgomery was cited with contempt of court by the judge. His hearing for this is on July 29/03 @6:30 p.m. at Toronto Small Claims Court at 47 Sheppard Ave. At this hearing I understand that Mr. Montgomery will be given one final opportunity so answer our Examination questions. Finally, it is true that Mr. Montgomery has filed a second motion for the same purpose as the first one. We don't expect he will win this especially if he once again chooses to be absent. Mr. Montgomery has admitted that he was taken to Small Claims Court by a lawyer for not paying his bill. He subsequently paid according to him $500. which would indicate that the suit was settled in favour of the lawyer. My earlier comments about this therefore, are just. Incidently, the copy of the invoice that I have from this lawyer showed a balance of $1,934.89. Mr. Montgomery's defence indicated that he admitted to $674. not $500. In any case, he does have this judgement against him as well as our own. I also stand by my comments that Mr. Montgomery coerced and threatened my son. Mr. Montgomery has been discredited in a court of law. That's all I have to say on the matter. It is my hope that anyone dealing with this man in the future will be cautious. We would appreciate any information that anyone can provide on this man's assets that could help us collect on our son's judgement. Please contact us at: (905) 681-2453.

I would like to respond to Mr. Montgomery's rebuttal. On November 14, 2002, judgement was given to the Plaintiff, my son Nathan in the amount of $10,000. plus pre and post judgement interest, costs, and an amount for inconvenience. $10,000 is the maximum one can claim in small claims court or the judgement would have been much higher. The total that Mr. Montgomery now owes our son is over $13,100. Mr. Montgomery's denial of this judgement is based on the fact that he has filed 2 motions attempting to get the judgement overturned. It is inaccurate to say that this matter has not been heard. A judgement and assessment is recorded. On March 4/03 a judge of the Toronto Small Claims Court adjourned our Examination hearing to allow for Mr. Montgomery's motion. Mr. Montgomery, did not attend his own motion and so on April 29/03 we were once again present for an Examination hearing. For anyone not familiar with the process, Examination hearings are held after a judgement is given in favour of the Plaintiff (usually), for the purpose of the Plaintiff being allowed to question the defendant under oath as to his assets. That fact that we have had several Examination dates indicates that we do indeed have a judgement. Also on April 29/03, Mr. Montgomery was cited with contempt of court by the judge. His hearing for this is on July 29/03 @6:30 p.m. at Toronto Small Claims Court at 47 Sheppard Ave. At this hearing I understand that Mr. Montgomery will be given one final opportunity so answer our Examination questions. Finally, it is true that Mr. Montgomery has filed a second motion for the same purpose as the first one. We don't expect he will win this especially if he once again chooses to be absent. Mr. Montgomery has admitted that he was taken to Small Claims Court by a lawyer for not paying his bill. He subsequently paid according to him $500. which would indicate that the suit was settled in favour of the lawyer. My earlier comments about this therefore, are just. Incidently, the copy of the invoice that I have from this lawyer showed a balance of $1,934.89. Mr. Montgomery's defence indicated that he admitted to $674. not $500. In any case, he does have this judgement against him as well as our own. I also stand by my comments that Mr. Montgomery coerced and threatened my son. Mr. Montgomery has been discredited in a court of law. That's all I have to say on the matter. It is my hope that anyone dealing with this man in the future will be cautious. We would appreciate any information that anyone can provide on this man's assets that could help us collect on our son's judgement. Please contact us at: (905) 681-2453.

Having read the statement made about me by Judy in Burlington I have the following to add; My companies are not corrupt and the vague defamitory statements made about me by Judy such as "breach of contract, failure to pay for services rendered, misrepresentation of facts, deception" are untrue and unfounded. Judy mentions "2 successful lawsuits: 1) for unpaid legal fees 2) for breach of contract (2002)" - It is true that I had a misunderstanding with a $500 lawyers invoice in 1995, the matter was dealt with in small claims court and I subsequently paid the $500 invoice. The second matter Judy refers to is before the courts presently and has not been heard yet, so it is premature on their part to suggest that they have been successful in their small claims court suit against me. Judy also states "Our son was coerced" and "then threatened" which is not true. My e-mail address is posted in Judy's rant and I would appreciate it being removed - [email protected]