Bitty
Tampa,#2Author of original report
Fri, May 25, 2012
I've already experienced Acree's idea of the truth: like not mentioning when you installed the replacement AC unit the truth about R-22 being a refrigerant that was known in 2008 to be in the process of being phased out in the coming years) so I could select a different unit than the one suggested by Acree (that, yes, uses R-22). Or having the technician tell me one thing, write the very same thing on the invoice only to overwrite it to reflect something less than what I was told (and I have the invoice in hand to back up this fact).
Acree is interested in the truth? Really? And now you are suggesting a showdown at my home between you, a company rep that you will call in (yeah, that will be a really impartial person that you will get to bring in yourself), and the actually transparent AC repair person that I called in for a second opinion... wait, strike that, my knight in shinning armor that made me flutter and swoon as he got my AC to work. Hahaha!, now, that's really funny, I mean, really, get on Jay Leno's show before you miss your chance at your 15 min. of fame. Who knew that the company's president fancies himself a comedian?
Anything else coming out of your side will be pointedly ignored. I am not a fool - I have come across 1 person at work and 2 friends of friends who also have experienced problems with the quality of service that Acree provides. Not interested in any offers you make at this point. My last words about this episode: Buyer beware!
Jack
Tampa,#3REBUTTAL Owner of company
Wed, May 23, 2012
As a consumer, if I received two differing opinions on a diagnosis, I would want to know who is telling me the truth. I mean, isn't that really the point of this forum, to protect consumers from people who mis diagnose or lie when making a diagnosis. What better way to find out who is telling the truth, than a meeting as we have suggested.
We stand behind our diagnosis and remain more than willing to prove our diagnosis is correct. We are even willing to go as far as to have the manufacturer of the product send a representative to the meeting to give thier opinion as well.
We are more than confident that this meeting would clear our name by proving that the leak exists.
Our offer stands should you decide you really want to know who is telling you the truth.
Bitty
Tampa,#4Author of original report
Thu, May 10, 2012
I have a copy of the Acree invoice in my hand, and it is very easy to see where the "technician" wrote "Found System out of Freon" but then overwrote "Low on" over the words out and on. So he said one thing and wrote something else: likely staff has been instructed never to put certain things or use certain words in writing. I was here and I know what the technician told me. There is a limit to what can be written in most of the client satisfaction sites and I cannot detail all the checks that the "night in shining armor" did to verify the system's integrity. By the way, that is a very condescending and patronizing phrase as it is applied in reference to damsels in distress and shows what little respect the owner of Acree has toward female customers - we, of course, could not possibly know anything about things mechanical, and make poor choices based on emotional weakness and need someone with a Y chromosome to bail us out - even though my father worked on industrial boilers, heating and cooling equipment for a living and I did pay attention to what he taught me. I'll take my "knight in shining armor" any day over the Acree technician who spent about 20-25 minutes to determine that I had a leaking coil while my "shining armor knight" spent a total of 90 minutes methodically eliminating possible causes (and showing me his findings at every step). One other thing that really showed me what Acree is all about - they installed a unit that uses a refrigerant that, at the time of the installation (2008), was known to be on its way to be phased out, meaning production would be stopped completely (R-22). It will be available for some time because R-22 must be recovered and recycled during servicing or replacement of existing equipment that requires its use, but guess what has happened and will co ntinue to happen to the cost of R-22 should you need to recharge a system? - it has gone up!!! So regardless of availability, it is more expensive to replace. What do you do with your existing inventory of new equipment that uses R-22... well, you sell it to customers without telling them of the impending change! Thank you, knight in shining armor, for informing me of this and other things that I was never told by Acree in 2008.
I'll pass on the Acree offer: fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. I don't want anyone from your company anywhere near my home. I'll chalk up the cost of the "diagnostic fee" to an education in what Acree is all about, and I'll keep telling others to seek AC help elsewhere.
Jack
Tampa,#5REBUTTAL Owner of company
Thu, May 10, 2012
As the owner of the company, we stand behind our work 100%. The devices we use to locate leaks are of the highest quality. We have them checked annually for accuracy. The only less fail able means of leak detection is inserting dye into the system and allowing it to operate. When the refrigerant leaks out, so does the dye which is then visible by a UV light.
Additionally, any research on the internet will show the unusual coil leak issues that our plaguing the air conditioning industry for the past few years. They are so bad that in some cases, the manufacturers are assisting homeowners by paying the labor for them.
We have been in business for over 45 years. I cannot tell you how many times the "knight in shining armor" rides in to save the day and tells a client that the leak doesn't exist, only to be there to "rape and pillage" when the compressor fails due to the damage done by the leak they never repaired.
When we run into these cases, and when the client choses to contact us looking for a resolution, we offer the same thing. I will have one of our managers meet the other company at the home and we will prove our diagnosis. If we cannot prove the existence of a leak, then we will pay all the expenses incurred by the homeowner up until that point as a result of the misdiagnosis. In 55 meetings with other companies, we were found to be mistaken only 1 time, which was a failure of the leak detector.
We make that offer to this client as well. We will meet the "project manager" and prove the existence of the leak.
We have a written policy about mis diagnosis and lying to clients and I can assure you that if our tech says there is a leak, there is one and we can and given the opportunity, will prove it.