Complaint Review: AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE - Modesto California

Are you STILL talking? Holy cannolli, even a train comes to a stop.

Why not tell the truth? Why not say, "I tried to be witty, and I used a bunch of words that I dont understand, and I used them incorrectly. Im an idiot." Thanks Rex. You are finally right about something!!!

If my parents named me "Meglio" I would have changed my name. Seriously. Maybe you've changed your gender to match the name. Whatever works for you, pal. Score a point for Meglio. I type so quickly that I omitted some words and "oenophile" appeared in an improperly structured sentence. You're still an idiot. I'm not the only one here that feels this way. Read all the other replies to your posts on this board. Do you have anything constructive to add to mortgage fraud discussions here? Anything at all? We're done here.

Well Rex, in an attempt to be witty you made yourself look uneducated again. Oenophile is a noun, but you used it as an adjective. You were using "oenophile" to describe your type of indulgence, which is grammatically incorrect. That would be like me saying, "Rex's sexual proclivity leads him towards man indulgences," WHEN REALLY, IT SHOULD READ "Rex's sexual proclivity leads him towards manLY indulgences." Did this little grammar lesson help you? Oh, and I was right about the 100% thing. While you responded, you didn't address the lack of logic in your post. So in essence, you didn't respond. Oh, and by the way, the first month of law school at Beasley - and most of the other top 25 law schools in America - involve refreshers on modus ponens, truth tables, syllogilistic thought, and the like. But then again, you thought Meglio was a woman's name, so I guess I should temper my expectations when it comes to your skills of comprehension.

"I am 100% POSITIVE THAT YOU WILL NOT RESPOND TO THIS POST..." You are incorrect. You are not 100% anything except 100% full of BS. I never said there were symptoms. You've re-drawn my analogy to fit your own argument. Start over, padawan. It is disappointing to learn that you didn't pass the bar exam, Meglio. I'm also sorry to hear that it took you a month to finish your logic and analogy exercises. At the time of my writing, I was in a state of post-dinner oenophile indulgence. I will continue to handicap my replies to you. There's no reason to accept you as anything more than a reprobate hirsute simian providing us with examples of spurious conjecture.

I am 100% POSITIVE THAT YOU WILL NOT RESPOND TO THIS POST OUT OF EMBARASSMENT. Let me - since you are a bit of an intellectual dilettante - explain the difference between understanding your credit and your driving history, and understanding your health. In the former two instances, you KNOW if you pay your bills on time. You KNOW this because all your bills comes with due dates, and if you go past the due dates, you are going to have credit issues. You ALSO KNOW if your driving record is bad because YOU KNOW if you have been pulled over in the past and given tickets for driving offenses. Now, if you have certain symptoms and the doctor tells you that you have a certain disease, even though you never had it before, you dont KNOW that the doctor is wrong in his diagnosis. You DONT KNOW because illnesses are often genetic, which means you couldn't trace the effect (the disease) to a certain cause (lifestyle, risky behavior). Also, there are countless diseases whose causes CAN NOT BE IDENTIFIED. However, since you can easily link the cause and effect of bad credit and a bad driving record, YOU KNOW that when someone tells you that you have bad credit - even though you pay every bill on time - that they are lying. Rex, in law school, the first thing you do is a month's worth of logic and analogy exercises. The purpose - of course - is to be able to make sound arguments, and identify large "leaps in logic." The fact that you are unable to identify the logical leap in your analogy shows a serious inability to think critically. I think you might want to refrain from future discussions that involve semantics.

Meglio - If you see a doctor and the doctor incorrectly tells you that you have an illness, yet you have never had that illness before... Then, you deserve to pay the bills for the treatment of that non-existent illness? Because you BELIEVED the doctor? You have confirmed to us here that you ARE retarded.

You seem to have a comment for everyone on here. How do you know what AMQ does if you didn't work there? Because you probably did and ripped off customers as well. You seem like the type. Always putting people down while not knowing all the circumstances of why they are where they are. AMQ loan officers make up plenty. That's how they get their ill-earned commissions. By ripping off the elderly and the uninformed. Whatever ... I don't need to explain that to you. You know all about that. You say you would deserve whatever for being that retarded. Well, guess what dude ... you ARE retarded. Your responses surely indicate that. So go blow off your steam somewhere else where it might be appreciated but I don't know where that would be. People who feel the need to cut others down are insecure with themselves. That comes out in your words. I guess I should feel sorry for you but I don't. See ya.

Brainwashing someone to think their credit is bad is NOT what AMQ does. They go over a clients "hurts," which are things that are adversely affecting a client's financial situation. EVen people with the best credit DO have these hurts. A loan officer cannot MAKE THAT STUFF UP. A client knows if they pay all their bills on time. If a client is dumb enought to believe their credit is bad even though they KNOW they pay all of their bills, then they deserve to move forward with that mindset. If someone told me I had a bad driving record even though I've NEVER had a traffic ticket, and I BELIEVED IT - then I deserve whatever I get for being that retarded.

Brainwashing someone to think their credit is bad is NOT what AMQ does. They go over a clients "hurts," which are things that are adversely affecting a client's financial situation. EVen people with the best credit DO have these hurts. A loan officer cannot MAKE THAT STUFF UP. A client knows if they pay all their bills on time. If a client is dumb enought to believe their credit is bad even though they KNOW they pay all of their bills, then they deserve to move forward with that mindset. If someone told me I had a bad driving record even though I've NEVER had a traffic ticket, and I BELIEVED IT - then I deserve whatever I get for being that retarded.

Brainwashing someone to think their credit is bad is NOT what AMQ does. They go over a clients "hurts," which are things that are adversely affecting a client's financial situation. EVen people with the best credit DO have these hurts. A loan officer cannot MAKE THAT STUFF UP. A client knows if they pay all their bills on time. If a client is dumb enought to believe their credit is bad even though they KNOW they pay all of their bills, then they deserve to move forward with that mindset. If someone told me I had a bad driving record even though I've NEVER had a traffic ticket, and I BELIEVED IT - then I deserve whatever I get for being that retarded.