;
  • Report:  #697018

Complaint Review: Arizona Board of Behavioral Health Examiners/Debra Rinaudo/Patricia Reynolds/Tina Zepeda - Phoenix Arizona

Reported By:
Anonymous - Anonymous, Arizona, United States of America
Submitted:
Updated:

Arizona Board of Behavioral Health Examiners/Debra Rinaudo/Patricia Reynolds/Tina Zepeda
3443 E. Central Ave Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
Phone:
Web:
Categories:
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good? What's this?
I have experienced the same as what was reported on January 18, 2010 report.  The Arizona Board at that time was not interested in the truth or protecting clients.  They were interested in and did ruin my career based on false allegations. 

As described by a member of the APA ethics committee, attorneys general threaten loss of license unless a professional submits to signing a consent agreement which has no basis in fact.  This is happening across the country.  It needs to stop today.  Coersion is something a police officer cannot do, and yet this same theme happens over and over to mental health professionals and no one is doing anything about it. 

These boards either need to be disbanded for their abuse of authority or replaced and reworked so that groupthink and Milgram studies/Philip Zimbardo's studies do not apply to our very profession!

No one in authority seems to have any ability to make a difference with this board.  The flurry of attorneys around this board is nothing but a feeding frenzy.  These attorneys do nothing but fold to the board and charge exorbitant amounts of money.

No appeal against this board has ever worked.  Why is that, Arizona? 

I am not surprised to hear of what is reported of Debra Rinaudo.  She and Patricia Reynolds ignored and hid the truth many times in my case.  These are destructive people.  How can people like this be trusted with any type of power or authority?! How can anyone with this dishonesty keep their job and represent a state entity?  This is inexcusable. 

This board covered up, ignored the truth on so many levels.  This is nothing less than corruption.  First amendment rights say that a person has  a right to pursue a profession of their choice and that if anyone is to come against their profession of choice, that the person has a right to be heard by a 'fair tribunal'.  This board had no relationship to fairness, only to the descriptors which have been assigned for many years - 'witch hunt', 'firing squad', etc.

I am glad someone else is speaking out.  The helping profession should not continue to fear assisting clients in their private practice.  The attorneys who participate in this mauling of good professionals need to develop a conscience and find an honest way to make a living (one can hope). Anyone who cannot use their authority in a good way should not be allowed the opportunity to have it.

Restitution would say that these people should have to make amends for all the losses they have created with so many over so much time.  The law protects them from any action.  This is wrong and needs to be changed.

Their is a time and a place where we will all answer for our actions and deeds.  As I understand it, 'tis better to make those corrections before that time.  I wish for their sakes that they choose this path, but I'm not holding my breath. 

What goes around comes around.  This group given a title and a responsibility could not have failed more miserably than they have.  There is nothing close to justice when it comes to this board and these people who have been named.  I hope they are stripped of any right to have any say over anyone else's life.  This.....would be justice.


17 Updates & Rebuttals

Elizabeth

Tucson,
Arizona,
United States
I agree

#2Consumer Comment

Tue, September 25, 2018

 I am having the exact same experience with this board despite 30 years of a squeaky clean record. The degrading things I heard said about me when my phone was on mute were stunningly unprofessional and inaccurate. I think those of us who have sincerely been treated unjustly by the Arizona Board of Behavioral Health Examiners need to file a class action law suit. Their "investigations" are a joke. They slander, liable and ruin very competent therapists careers, at least they have mine. Enough is enough. Anyone in for a class action suit, we should contact each other. The Arizona Board even has one particular attorney they prefer working with. That doesn't bode well with me regarding "ethics" on their part. I will be checking the posts. If anyone is interested in pursuing this corrupt board, let me know.


Anonymous

Parker,
Colorado,
I am asking for help on your behalf

#3Author of original report

Mon, March 18, 2013

I just wrote to the members of both committees and their chairs, as well as the governor's office.  I asked that they do something to help you - I hope you don't mind. I let them know what you posted here.

 I think the only way this can happen is if you contact them and let them know what you are going through and identify yourself to them.  I shared that your experience is very similar to mine, which shows what the board is doing....over and over again.

  Good luck to you - don't give up.  i hope the reign of terror of this board is almost over.  Those of us affected need to speak frankly and candidly to those who are trying to help and understand how out of control this board, AZBBHE, truly is.

  You can ask to testify in front of the House Health Committee on Wednesday morning, March 20th at 9:00 a.m.  I attached that information for you in case you want to participate.  You can also view the previous board hearings in the Senate that recently took place on the AZ government website so you can see what the senate committee is doing to address this.  

Senator Nancy Barto has created this bill and has been applauded for her efforts.  It is said that the governor is being pressured to veto this billing, cleaning up the incredible abuse of power of this board.  Please contact them and let them know of your experience.  It will be powerful and helpful.  If we all speak up about the incredible injustices, we can all benefit. 

And success is not very far away, thanks to the efforts of the Therapeutic Alliance and other groups who see the great need for change.  You are one of many who have impacted, but I believe that you and I am some others have been the most significantly impacted by this board, where licensing is in peril.  Fight......and win. 


Anonymous

Parker,
Colorado,
You can do something....

#4Author of original report

Mon, March 18, 2013

You might want to contact the Therapeutic Practitioners Alliance of Arizona.  Senate Bill 1374 already passed the Senate and is now being heard in the House Health Committee. There is a hearing on Wednesday, March 20th at 9:00 a.m. in this committee to address what has happened to so many of us.

Please share what is happening to you with the committee chairs and members, as well as Governor Jan Brewer.  What happened to you validates what happened to me and so many others.  Here is the information.  There are so many who have been harmed and this legislature is addressing this NOW!

Legislative Action Alert:  3/15/13

Please call and/or email the House Health Committee Members TODAY and request they vote YES on SB 1374! 

SB 1374:  Board of Behavioral

Health Examiners passed the Senate and moved to the House where it has been assigned to House Health.  This bill, with amendments, is scheduled to be heard in House Health on Wednesday, March 20th at 9AM.  Sign into ALIS in support of SB 1374 at http://alistrack.azleg.gov/rts/login.asp TODAY! 

Contact the House Health Committee members and urge their support of SB 1374. 

Join us at the Capitol Wednesday morning!










House Health



Carter [email protected]

Boyer [email protected]



BrophyMcGee, [email protected]

Lovas, [email protected]

Townsend, [email protected]



Gonzales, [email protected]

Meyer, [email protected]

Steele, [email protected]







Bahney

Dedolph, Policy Analyst

Arizona Council of Human

Service Providers

2100 N. Central, Suite

225





I understand about being single and going through all of this.  It is disgusting and demoralizing and it sounds like the board is still spreading their version of terrorism.  Only for a short time longer.  Hang in there and let the people know who can help!!!!!


Shughight

Phx,
Arizona,
Debra Rinauldo, Michelle Clinkenbeard & entire AZBBHE Board are criminals

#5Consumer Comment

Mon, March 18, 2013

I am a licensed Clinician for the past 15 years who has an amazing work ethic, high integrity and a stellar reputation within the field and with peers. AZBBHE has treated myself and numerous other colleagues as vicious, low life criminals by lying repeatedly, imposing unwarranted penalties, defaming our character, demeaning us as individuals and threatening us with the loss of our license if we stand up for ourselves and refuse to I've into their coercion and blatant abuse of their position/power. Like so many before me, I have been "guilty" immediately without any input, questioning of myself or others, investigation of the facts etc. They manipulate, lie, make up their own truths and ruin people's lives! I was previously forced into one of their BS "Consent Agreements" even though I easily jumped though all hoops, passed all "assessments" with their "Specialists" ( cost me 3500 cash for each one...two total) and ad not done ANYTHING REMOTELY RELATED TO CLINICAL PRACTICE! Long story short, it didn't matter what evidence, support, written documentation, testimony etc was presented on my behalf; from day one, they were out to crucify me and did so against ALL evidence given to them including that from the courts. Even after going through all of this, they then reported me to the Nat'l Practictioners Databank under completely false pretenses and stated the exact opposite of everything proved to them. 

At that time I wanted to voluntarily surrender my license. I was disgusted, financially and emotionally strapped and felt that I would never receive any support, due process or a fighting chance should anyone EVER file a complaint about ANYTHING, regardless of how ridiculous it is. I WAS RIGHT! Four years later, a previous client from 2008 in a desperate situation to keep or lose his freedom indefinitely as a 3 TIMES CONVICTED SO who had already been through the Civil Commitment process, made up a ridiculous story and his new therapist, OF ONE DAY, filed a complaint. The beyond judgmental, naive, RUDE,Investigator, Michelle Clinkenbeard decided I was guilty ad that all reported was fact and 100% true and she had never even spoken with me. My interview was a joke, one sided and her mind obviously fixed on the outcome of persecuting me regardless of evidence presented. I was given 2 weeks to find an atty, do investigations etc etc and then present before the Board. She also had the gall to say that I was a "danger to society" and she immediately suspended my license, a must for my now ruined employment. I was ready to surrender my license and be done with these immoral, heartless and despicable people for good. The "offered" consent agreement to voluntarily surrender was full of allegations, assumptions, lies and little to no fact. When I replied, Michelle stated that I never sent it in regardless of my provided proof that I had. She then reoffered the voluntary surrender to instead sed out my hearing notice for a Formal Hearing that I d NOT REQUEST AND DON'T WANT!! It is my right to have a hearing as well as decline one. Instead, not only did she violate her offer and our agreement of a Voluntary Surrender with FACTUAL ConsentbAgreement, she is trying to FORCE me to attend something I know for a fact will be nothing but a demeaning, hurtful, spiteful attack on my character and I have no interest in that. However, if I don't attend this Hearing that I DID NOT REQUEST then she stated that everything she has written (no proof of her "conclusions or supposed fact") is being supported by me as being factual and true. THIS IS COERCION, IT IS LYING, DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER, SLANDER and numerous things not to mention, AGAINST THE LAW! This Board repeatedly gets away with this and ruins jobs, families, reputations, finances and individuals with their callous, immoral and unethical practices. I for one am walking away from a successful career that I worked d**n hard at and it's leaving a single mother with no income and emotionally, financially and mentally depleted. I'm having to start completely over with nothing because of them. I will do WHATEVER IT TAKES to get this out there and get Ms "I already lost a license" Rinauldo" and her team of incompetent so called Investigators exposed, fired and given criminal penalties for all of their deceitful, unlawful behavior. I think they should be held personally responsible for all of the financial hardship wrongly forced upon others and Ms. Rinauldo should NEVER hold any time of public office or position of power again. 

WHO IS READY TO BAN TOGETHER, UTILIZE THE MEDIA, THE PUBLIC FORUMS, OUR WORKPLACES, THE COURTS AND WHATEVER IT TAKES TO MAKE THIS STOP?????? 


Grace & Peace

maricopa,
Arizona,
United States of America
AZBBHE Has Ruined My Life

#6REBUTTAL Individual responds

Sun, January 20, 2013

I was employed by Magellan Health Services for about 3.5 years.  My role as a Clinical Care Manager was to review the medical necessity criteria of enrolled beneficiaries during an inpatient hospitalization at Desert Vista Hospital. When a beneficiary in our clinical judgement did not meet medical necessity criteria 3.14.2 concurrent review, then we refer the case for physician review. In this particular case the person I was reviewing for concurrent review met the SMI criteria and had problems managing diabetic medication on their own.  Upon review the physician determined the beneficiary did not meet medical necessity criteria 3.14.2 for continued stay and issued a notice of action.  A Notice of Action is appealable but basically means that Magellan will not continue to pay for inpatient hospitalization because criteria is not met. At the time Magellan Care Managers had to sign off on the document and send the Notice of Action to the patient and their guardian. Currently, physicians do sign off on the document as they should.  The physician believed that the beneficiary could live in the community in a least restrictive environment with diabetic management in residential as compared to the State Hospital as their AZ Public Fiduciary was ordering the system to pay for. Afterwards, a grievance was filed to Magellan claiming I infringed on the patients rights due to the Notice of Action.  Magellan Grievance Department found the grievance to be unfounded as all the proper steps was taken.
Shortly afterwards (June 2009) I received a call from Patricia Reynolds that a "anonymous" complaint was filed to the Board claiming that I was holding a fraudulent license because I did not report to the AZBBHE that I was employed by Magellan.  What is interesting is that in March of 2009, I renewed my LMSW and listed Magellan as my current employer. Patricia called a former employer that was listed as my present employer Horizon Human Services who report I was terminated for not completing probation.  In fact I reported that I resigned from my position with two-week notice but my employer told me to leave that day. After an argument to advocate for two-week resignation to process & transition my clients to a new therapist, I was asked to leave within 15 minutes or the OP Director was going to call the police. 
I was put on probation by the OP CD after it was reported that my mileage sheets did not add up to my billable hours on one particular day. I had my schedule with me, opened it up and showed him my schedule. I was taught by my practicum supervisor to always turn in your clinical notes on time so I was very (anal) good at that.  I asked to go to my office and pull up CLAIMTRAK to pull up my billable hours for the day in question.  I was told that if I left the office I was fired unless I signed the document. I asked if the probation was appealable. The OP CD told me to sign it and ask HR. I signed the document knowing I was innocent and was instructed by HR to file an appeal to the CEO. 
 
I went to my office pulled up CLAIMTRAK and bamm there they were just as my calendar reported. I made copies then met with my supervisor. She reported that stuff like that happens at HHS all the time and to just go with the flow. She looked at my CLAIMTRAK report and concurred that the report appears to indicate I did in fact see more than 2 people that day.  After my appeal and multiple emails to the CEO, I decided to resign because I was hurt & angry.  An interesting fact is that one week before I was placed on probation I did ask the CEO how could our Chief Financial Officer who was arrested x 2 for stalking women could work for an agency working with vulnerable people.  My last day was 11/02/2006.
 
I was not licensed at the time by the Board and submitted my application to the Board notarized on October 24th but somehow they claim they didn't receive it until 11/13, 11 days after my resignation/termination.  In my initial and renewal application for my LMSW I did not accurately list my dates of past and present employment as I did not refer to a resume as I should have. In fact I was off a year not just reflecting HHS but all my jobs before and after.  I admitted that I did not document the dates with careful review but did not intend to mislead the Board. The SW Committee voted to revoke my license.  I did not have an attorney at the time as I did not fully understand the gravity of the situation. During this entire time I was employed by Magellan and updated my supervisor and our utilization manager of the Board proceedings. I contracted an attorney to represent me at the Board hearing.
 
At the Board hearing my attorney did represent me well.  The Board voted to refer the case back to the SW Committee. During the Board hearing a Board member expressed she thought it was interesting that HHS reported that I was fired because on Monday, 10/30/2006, I was reported not to have shown up to work and that they didn't know where I was until Wednesday so they fired me on Thursday; however, an email from HHS was submitted to the Board by HHS HR that contradicted their own claim because an email from the OP CD to the CEO on 10/30 reported that I had called in sick that day.  The requests for information by my attorney to have the same information the Board has was not granted because they felt that I could retaliate against HHS.  
 
We go to the SW Committee and I'm given a consent agreement. They attempted to require that I only work at an OBHL. My attorney was successful in adding "MAgellan" to the list of employers because if he didn't I would have been forced out.  Appears there was a Pub Fid. attempt to remove me from Magellan. The CA was to be accepted by the Board. The day of the Board meeting I actually had the flu and called in that morning to report my absence. I even went to my doctor. I was told that I did not have to be there unless for some reason the Board decided to ask questions. The Board did decide to ask me a question and my absence was not reported. The question from the Board was why did I not submit an employment verification.
 
My case was sent back to the SW Committee.  My claim was that I did send an employment verification to MAry Wilson via email and had a copy of the email. The SW committee voted to revoke my license again and ordered me to may a large amount of money for not fulfilling my CA. Later I get a letter in the mail that reports that the SW Committee has issued a letter of caution for my behavior. In the meantime I'm having poor luck locating an approved supervisor.  The CA mandates that I find a supervisor who is licensed at the independent level or higher. I called MAry Wilson who reports a LPS or LCSW could supervise me.  I found a LPC at Magellan who would supervise me.  The SW Committee chair denied her based on that she only had 3 hours in clinical supervision. I was given an extension so that my supervisor could complete more hours in clinical supervision.  I resubmitted her name and she was denied again because she completed 7 hours of clinical training in 1 day. 
 
Next I called AZBBHE to find out what they are requiring of a supervisor.  I also sent emails to AZBBHE to clarify what they want.  I was told by Debra not to call or email any staff member at the Board anymore. I found another supervisor who is an LCSW. I submitted her name for which she too was denied based on she only had 6 hours and to resubmit. MY attorney had talked to Debra who reports that if I was to verify through Magellan IT that I did forward the email to the AZBBHE then they would accept my employment verification as opposed to taking the case to superior court (which I should have because she lied to us). During the SW committee hearing it was apparent she had lied to my attorney because she reported to the committee that the Board IT could not verify I sent the email despite a letter from Magellan IT Manager reporting that I did. My proposed supervisor had completed an additional 6 hours for a total of 12, as it was finally made clear what specific supervision hours they wanted. Debra also reported to the committee that I fraudulently attempted to qualify my supervisor by initially reporting she had more clinical hours than was approved by the Board.
 
In fact at the last hearing, my case was scheduled for the third case for review, instead my case was passed until the very end. This cost me an extra $2500 in attorney fees.  What was interesting is that there was only one person in the audience. She was the supervisor of the Pub Fid who filled the grievance against me.  This entire case was messed up.  They withheld information from my attorney, Debra introduces new information after your 5 minutes of floor time and you have no chance to defend yourself. The Board shouldn't even act upon anonymous complaints.  I had no ground to stand on because my attorney and I could not prepare our defense. My license was suspended for 24 months and I lost my clinical position with Magellan.  I'm not even able to find an on-call position because my license is on restriction.  I'm lost what to do because I have no money, to the point I can't even pay my mortgage.  I do know this, in the end KArma is a b***h and I hope I have an opportunity to watch.


Anonymous

Parker,
Colorado,
USA
Response to Gogettem in Scottsdale

#7Author of original report

Thu, November 15, 2012

This is quite a comprehensive push to make changes.  I had no idea that there was such good organization to fight against the beyond punitive actions of the Board.  I don't feel any member or the executive director should be able to keep their positions with the typranny against practitioners they have shown over and over again.  No 2nd, 3rd or 4th chances, they need to be gone.

When is the best time to try to get remedy?  How far in the future can we expect that our good names are restored along with full privileges?

It sounds like these?/this organization is doing a broad sweep of the problems with this board.  I had the idea, too, for practitioners who have been negatively affected to have recourse.  If this was developed in 2008, it shows that no one has been able to successfully find remedy.  It sounds like with these bold actions, that something(s) are finally being done.

It is funny that the board was given little time to respond.  I found that I was treated in this way.  The complainants were given all the time they needed, slandering and lying all the way through.  I was barely given any time to defend myself.  I wondered why I even wasted my breath.  They didn't believe me or anyone who could should that I was not guilty of what they were accusing me of.  My atty said he had never seen anyone treated like this in 20 years of his defending medical doctors.  He was appalled.

I recognize the name of Rory Hays as attorney. 

It sounds like this is well organized.  I hope that this is sustained, because under pressure and lawsuits, Debra Rinaudo just grows a new skin.  She doesn't seem to be impacted when anyone comes against her because no one ultimately has shown that they have power to change anything.  My atty said that out of all of the appeals, NONE of them worked, so the system is a failure in this way. He said it would cost $40K to do it with no hope of a good outcome.  The powers that be are as corrupt as they can be and in my mind, the only remedy is to relieve them of their responsibilities.  If a person or organization cannot handle power well, they should have ANY power or ANY way to impact people's lives.

I applaud you for organizing and taking this on and letting others know about it.  This is a long time coming and I hope that it has success to overturn what Sen John McCain has said about this board - that they have had complaints about it for the past 20 years (that was some time ago).  Replacing the bad seeds may not be the answer, if this is the case, in comparison to the 6 years of problems (how long she has been director, maybe?).  Anyway, this is a long term, chronic problem....and it sound like somebody or somebodies will finally stop the bleeding.  It sounds like Debra Rinaudo is finding out that she had better act right.  But what about all of the loss she has already created?  If she had to make restitution for just myself, she'd never be able to make it up to me - financially, and in all other ways.  There has been so incredibly much loss.

Thank you again for all of this hard work to remedy what has been a terrible situation for many.  I will note the websites you are referring to and if you can keep me posted as to developments, or I will find them through the resources given, this will be much appreciated.  Gogettem.....that's a great name!


Gogettem

Scottsdale,
Arizona,
United States of America
Look for my post with info

#8Consumer Comment

Thu, November 15, 2012

I just posted the info I promised you.  It should be up on this site by tomorrow.  Keep your eyes out for it.  I think I titled it "Complaints against Debra Rinaudo and Board".


Gogettem

Scottsdale,
Arizona,
United States of America
A place for complaints against Debra Rinaudo and Board

#9Consumer Comment

Thu, November 15, 2012

As promised, I am providing you some information.  At the bottom you will find 2 websites that may be useful for you.

It was a good day for behavioral health practitioners and the Arizona Council for Human Service Providers (ACHSP)!
As you know, the stakeholders have been meeting with the Board of Behavioral Health Examiners to remedy multiple concerns, including issues around reciprocity, supervision and curriculum. The stakeholder group has grown significantly since July 2012 and includes representatives from all four professional organizations, representatives from ASU, NAU, University of Phoenix, Ottowa University, Prescott College, CACREP specialists, and other interested organizations. The stakeholders have
unanimously agreed on a variety of state statute changes that will be presented to legislators. These include a change to the current Reciprocity/Reciprocal License statute which will eliminate the need for one year of clinical supervision, changes to the curriculum statutes that also provide an opportunity for educational institutions to seek prior program approval,
additional definition of terms, clarification of supervision requirements and much more. In fact, the ACHSP has proposed a comprehensive restructuring of the Board and the establishment of an impaired professionals program (something
that was agreed to and written into statute in 2008).

Today, the BBHE went before the Committee of Reference of Joint Legislative Audit which makes recommendations on the continuation of the agency, any conditions for continuation and the length of time before the agency's next review. Prior to
this appearance the BBHE procedures were scrutinized by the Office of the Auditor General. The Auditor General presented their findings as did a number of professionals and stakeholder group members. Additionally, the ACHSP and its
attorney, Rory Hays, briefly presented proposed changes. The Committee of Reference members asked questions of the speakers and then asked the BBHE to respond. The BBHE was given comparatively little time to present it's case and
the members of the Committee of Reference expressed grave concerns about the BBHE processes and performance. The BBHE's executive director and its lobbyist were openly chastised for not being responsive to its members and seeking
statutory remedies when there have clearly been issues for at least the past six years.

The outcome was that the BBHE will continue to be open to making necessary changes and the Committee of Reference asked them to "fully embrace the changes we recommend....". The Committee of Reference agreed to review the BBHE again in four years and to have the Auditor General monitor them every 6-18 months.

The next steps will be to continue meeting with the stakeholders and revise and create new statutes which will be turned into a Bill that must pass both the House and the Senate. This will happen over the next six months. During that time, you may be asked to write to your legislators in support. We will continue to keep you updated and share additional information received from the ACHSP.

Best regards,

Therapeutic Practitioners Alliance of Arizona

P.S. We are developing a website to keep you informed. www.tpallianceofaz.org
What information would you like to see on the website?

I would also like to announce AICA. A clearing house for complaints against board staff or board members. John
Butler is your contact person.

Hopefully we will have our Web site up with a complaint form on the site with email.  Here is the site   AICA-AZ.COM

I hope this helps you.  Keep me posted.  And spread the word.  


Anonymous

Parker,
Colorado,
USA
Debra Rinaudo

#10Author of original report

Thu, November 15, 2012

I think it was the state of Washington or somewhere similar where she practiced law and was accused of ethical violations.  She oved to Arizona after this and has been coming against practitioners for quite some time, with no oversight whatsoever.  THe board has been referred to as a 'firing squad', 'lynch mob' and other such descriptors.  I would have to agree with these sentiments.  They have no interest in listening to the truth.  Their rampage is to take out practitioners as quickly and as harshly as possible.

There is a post from in these reports from a person who directly worked with Debra Rinaudo.  With all of these events, justice must be served somewhere and this group needs to be taken out of power since they don't seem to know how to judge fairly.


POOR AND WRONGLY ACCUSED CLIENT WO

los angeles,
California,
USA
Despite this effort, human trafficking remains a tragic reality with wide-ranging social, economic and legal implications that affect all segments of society.SEPTEMBER 29 2012 FATHER GARY ROSENTHAL IS

#11UPDATE EX-employee responds

Thu, November 15, 2012

Despite this effort, human trafficking remains a tragic reality with wide-ranging social, economic and legal implications that affect all segments of society.SEPTEMBER 29 2012 FATHER GARY ROSENTHAL IS THE CHILDRENS BEST INTEREST

UPDATE Monday, October 08, 2012

TO THE PRESIDING IN JUSTICE HONORABLE JUDGE OF THE SUPREME COURT  IN 366.26 HEARING WITHOUT PRIOR NOTICE

CASE NOS.

J067944

J067945

J067946

J067947

RE: MINUTE ORDER DATED 09-18-2012 FOLLOW UP ON MY REQUEST SENT LAST WEEK FOR EMERGENCY HEARING  OF

REQUEST FOR EMERGENCY REHEARING OF 09-12-2012 HEARING To prevent and combat trafficking in persons; and

(b) To protect victims of trafficking in persons, especially women and children, from revictimization.

THAT SHOULD INCLUDE FATHER OF ISAIAH AND TIFFANY AND SOPHIA AND ALISA V.   UNLESS A REHEARING IS GRANTED MY 4 CHILDREN INCLUDING 8 YRS OLD CHILD WITH SEVERE HEARING IMPAIRMENT WILL CONTINUE TO BE REMOVED , CAUSING IRREPERABLE HARM BY VCHSA AND CWDA DIRECTOR BARRY ZIMMERMANS SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEE PERSONAL INVOLVEMENT AS SHE REMOVED OUR CHILDREN AND SUPERVISES THE 0914-2010 FILING CASE J067944 AND OBTAINED RESTRAINING ORDERS FOR EVERY SINGLE EMPLOYEE AND CO EMPLOYEE OF THE HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE AND PROHIBIT A DISABLED FATHER PUBLIC SERVICES AND AGENCY REFUSES TO HONOR HIS VISITATION RIGHTS IN THE AGENCYS DISCRETIONARY CHOICE OF ITS ABUSE TO IRREPERABLY HARM HIS CHILDREN WHICH ALSO HARMS THE LOVING FATHER WHO RAISED THEM WELL UNTIL DETENTION BY ERRONEOUS NEGLEGT ALLEGATION OF VIOLENCE .

IEP TEAM PARENTS PARTICIPATION TO FULL INVOLVEMENT OF FATHER ROSENTHAL AND WITH MOTHER VELASCO ON SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL AND WRONGLY ACCUSED OF ABUSE OR NEGLECT .

AND SELPA SPECIAL EDUCATION DAY CLASS DID NOT UNDERSTAND THE MSW DORA SAENZ BELDEN AND QUESTIONS AND CRIED FOR MOMMY AND ON 08-13-2010 DADDY WAS IN LOS ANGELES HELPING THE KIDS GRANDMA AND I GARY ROSENTHAL RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR ASSISTANCE IN EMERGENCY HEARING OR REHEARING GRANT FOR DUE PROCESS VIOLATIONS TO  DISABLED DAUGHTER AND THE

 FATHER WITH DISABILITIES THAT DO NOT AFFECT THE GOOD PARENTING OF HIS 4 VELASCO ROSENTHAL MINORS. IN CASES    J067944 THRU J067947. Despite this effort, human trafficking remains a tragic reality with wide-ranging social, economic and legal implications that affect all segments of society.

 The Palermo Protocol defines human trafficking as:

 [] the recruitment, transportation, transfer, harbouring or receipt of persons, by means of the threat or use of force or other forms of coercion, of abduction, of fraud, of deception, of the abuse of power or of a position of vulnerability or of the giving or receiving of payments or benefits to achieve the consent of a person having control over another person, for the purpose of exploitation. Exploitation shall include, at a minimum, the exploitation of the prostitution of others or other forms of sexual exploitation, forced labour or services, slavery or practices similar to slavery, servitude or the removal of organs.

 This definition is structured around three major elements:

 ?  ACT: Human trafficking involves the recruitment, transportation, transfer, harboring and/or receipt of a person.

 ?  MEANS: It can be the threat or use of force, deception, abduction, the abuse of power or a position of vulnerability, or other forms of coercion.

?  PURPOSE: The purpose of human trafficking is exploitation, which can include the prostitution of others, forced labor, slavery or servitude.


 While EHTN uses this definition as the basis of its work, we look at trafficking in a broader context acknowledging that trafficking can occur on a small scale without organized criminal involvement and that women, children and men can be trafficked within as well as between countries

The return of EACH VELASCO - ROSENTHAL CHILD to his or her parent would not create a risk of detriment to the safety, protection, or physical or emotional well-being of the child, and the child's placement in foster care is unnecessary and innapropriate.

WAS NOT HOME TO STOP THE ABUSIVE SOCIAL INJUSTICE BY HSA EMPLOYEE OF BARRY ZIMMERMANS DIRECTION TO REMOVE CHIILDREN IN ANOTHER APARTMENT AND TOOK IT UPON HERSELF TO CAUSE THE REMOVAL OF OUR 4 BEAUTIFUL WELL RAISED ADORABLE HAPPY WELL NOURISHED AND THRIVING CHILDREN


PARENTS INCOME PROPERTY AND STOCK OWNERSHIP OF OUR FAMILY SAVINGS THAT WERE DEPLETED BY HSA TRANSFER OF ALL FUNDS FROM BANKS AND US TREASURY INTO HSA TRUST ACCOUNT COMMINGLED FOR REMOVAL OF OUR CHILDREN UNJUSTLY AND UNREASONABLY OFFEREED SERVICES CONTRACT IN BREACH BY CREATION OF SELF REFERED MSW SAENZ-BELDEN AND ERRONEOUS REPORT BY  SUSAN FELDMAN AND READ TO THE JUDGE TAR  L CODY BY CHILD ATTY ANDREW WOLF THAT PREJUDICED THE GOOD PARENTS THAT LOST CHILDREN FOR NO VALID REASON AND KEPT APART BY MALFEASENCE AND MORAL TURPITUDE  ON 09-12-2012 BAD FAITH GRANT OF GUARDIANSHIP WITHOUT NOTICE WHILE I CALLED IN WEEKLY TO REQUEST NOTICE FOR HEARING DATE AND NO  VISITATION TO FATHER THAT IS SUFFERING PTSD AND SEPERATION ANXIETY MISSING MY CHILDREN

FATHER GARY R. ROSENTHAL SR. DOES NOT DESERVE TO LOSE CHILDREN AND CHILDREN LOVE AND MISS THEIR FATHER AND  Reluctance to leave home.

To prevent and combat trafficking in persons; and

(b) To protect victims of trafficking in persons, especially women and children, from revictimization.

CHILDREN ARE SUFFERING NEEDLESLY DEPRIVED OF THE PARENTS

 Difficulty maintaining balance in their lives.

 Difficulty sleeping.

 Difficulty communicating thoughts.

 Low threshold of frustration.

 Limited attention span.

 Poor work performance.

 Headaches/stomach problems.

 Tunnel vision/muffled hearing.

 Colds or flu-like symptoms.

 Disorientation or confusion.

 Difficulty concentrating.

 Fear of crowds, strangers, or being alone.FATHER,GARY ROSENTHAL   Depression, sadness.

Mood-swings and easy bouts of crying.

 Feelings of hopelessness. Overwhelming guilt and self-doubt.

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

I SWEAR TO GOD I DID NOT GET ANY COURT NOTICE FOR THE SEPT 12 2012 HEARING FROM COURT UNTIL AFTER THE HEARING TOOK PLACE IN BAD FAITH AND WAS CHANGED BY SECRET MEETING AGAINST ME TO PRECLUDE MY ABUNDANCE OF EVIDENCE IN MY FAVOR SHOWING BEYOND A SHADOW OF A DOUBT THAT I AM A REALY GOOD DAD AND MY CHILDREN AND I ARE SUFFERING AND WILL SUFFER IRREPERABLE HARM IF IN GUARDIANSHIP

(O VISITATION IS ORDERED) AND VCBH dr.cogbill Increased use of drugs/alcohol.

HONESTLY , I AM A GOOD FATHER AND MY CHILDREN LOVE ME AND AS A GOOD FATHER WHO EARNED STRAIGHT A IN US HISTORY AND

BY THE US CONSTITUTION I ASK THAT THE VENTURA SUPERIOR COURT REVIEW CASE J067944

PLEASE GRANT A REHEARING FOR THE PREJUJDGE HEARING DATES 09-12-2012 THAT TOOK AWAY MY RIGHTS WITHOUT THE RIGHT TO DO SO AND DENY MY RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS

NO DANGER EXISTED PRIOR TO DETENTION OF 4 WELL RAISED HAPPY CHILDREN All this is pertaining to the Ventura County human services agency that unlawfully a illegally removed my children around one disabled eight year old child case name alisa c. velasco et al in case no. J067944 AND SIBLING CASES 45, 46 , 47, AND EXTRAORDINARY WRIT CASE B239800 only misses the special education school over AND skips Rosenthal good parenting good parenting skills , vary by my step parenting class and other parenting classes that resulted in awarding custody, full custody of my son Gary Richard Rosenthal jr. and finding that I AM a good parent. Each and  every Youth and most others in Camarillo Province and in the area housing authority projects: Ellis terrace apartment community written statements within our community including neighbors and close tenants in the community are of agreement that gary Richard Rosenthal is a good parent.  And gary is someone who takes very good care of his children and in spite of racism and discrimination by the area housing authority of ventura county ca. and the asset manager maria bibian and the site tech sheleena lee  mission to discredit union of velasco -rosenthal parents unit at apt #103 ejection from the retialiatory assisted eviction help of karol shulkin that since 2004 enlisted and Dora Saenz Belden, a master social worker and National Association of social worker 2009 board member and director of section G of the California chapter of National Association of social workers , whereas master social worker Dora Saenz Belden arrived and served herself up on the incorrect assumpyion at the wrong apt 103 while reports where to detain 3 children in apt 201 on August 13, 1010 but self reffered and used illegal unlawful entry in our unit 103 through opening screen door break in unnanounced and uninvited traspass covered up in falsifing reason and use of erroneous means to fulfill her title i-ve tuition based fund allocation requirements is actually misused misappropriations in federal funds by tari l. codi to remove our children and egregious in nature . but the reports say otherwise that she was supposed to be an apartment 201 two zero one that which means UNNECCESSARY SEPERATION OF MY FAMILY of the day FALSE IMPRISONEMENT began BEFORE the day the year 2012 began the two years ago and that the 2010 INJUSTICE AUGUST 13 TO both of us is that the dora belden memo said" the McKinney-Vento my goal inform me that began the events that now made all of us homeles and deprived us a good family and had the memo said the McKinney-Vento my goal was to be somewhere and mailed me or gave me prior

 notice that would include that VOAA idea that the help it is designed by dora team of mdt to provide

a new home, may have worked better but .

 not be given notice no later than what who and where to be or go and instead issued notices that

were not valid and in bad faith and the amazing thing for the competitive games while indicating that to the public that THERE IS KIDS TO BE REMOVED IF YOU HAVE 4 OR MORE THAT ARE GOOD LOOKING that's the scary truth and traces that MOSIO  company used by H.S.A. leaves in the computer AND CELL PHONE THE HSA-HHS-HSA USED TO ATTACK AND STOP ME FROM SENDING OR RECIEVING WHILE THEY COPY MY EVIDENCE ELECTRONICALLY THEN HIDE MY FILES FROM ME IS ALSO PRIVACY VIOLATIONS AND IF DELETED ALSO VANDALISM, ROBBERY,  DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY, RECIEVING STOLEN GOODS, AND TRESPASSING PLUS UNJUST ENRICHMENT FROM HIPPA VIOLATIONS STEM FROM BARRY ZIMMERMAN CWDA CORPORATE ESPIANAGE OF AN INSIDERS FINANCIALLY SEXUALL RELATIONSHIP WITH DORA SAENZ BELDEN SIMILIAR TO PARTNERSHIP AND CONTRACT RELATIONSHIP BUT WITH ULTERIOR MOTIVES COSTING TAXPAYERS IN CA MILLIONS AND FEDERAL TAX PAYERS NEARLY 1.7 BILLION when of an order by a judge AFTER ORDER IS BIASED BASED BY FEMALE JUDGE T.L. C. AGAINST ALL MALE PARENTS that a PUBLIC AGENCY body ENTERTAINS AS SUCH INHUMAN SERVICES at various degrees of her choice, thus can circumvent the courts with judge friendships but with no improvement of the law nor adherance thereto but the mere appearance of it , is included to hold those agency employees unnaccountable of their fraudulent and coercive transactions, contemporeanously perjure themselves away from recusal and accountablity  by use of frivolous injuctive orders for financial gain by courts own officers and one in judicial capacity also allows and/or unjust and  deprivation orders against good well raised children and issues workplace violence orders against parents who have done no wrong to beg for their visitation rights and ignored as such is the case as recently as of the 25 month case terminated dependancy for time rerstricted financial reasons and redated minute orders in altered transcripts without requesting noticed augmentation in case no. j067944 09-13-2010 to filing 09-1-2010 changed 09-14-2010 to terminated 09-12-2012 and issue more orders after dependancy is listed terminated in minute orders of case j067944 is fraud upon and by the ventura county superior court in oxnard CA. juvenile courts use of ABUSE of discretion. H S A FORGERY OF CASE PLANS AND ICWA SIGNATURES AVOID TRIBAL INTERFERANCE TO GAIN INTEREST THEREBY  ABROGATING CONTRACT LAW then contract termination preceeded by hsa contract deviation is to obstruct and obscure the more important public interest . 

I GARY ROSENTHAL AM THE VICTIM AND I REFUSE TO ACCEPT THAT I WORKED FOR 24 YEARS AND PAYED TAXES FOR HSA NON TAX PAYING PUBLIC AGENCY EMPLOYEES TO DO THIS FRAUD AND PRECLUDE MY TESTIMONY BY ITS ISSUE OF WORKPLACE INJUCTIONS, THAT ALLOW HSA COMMISSION OF CRIMES THEREAFTER ACCUSING AND CHARGING ME OF THOSE CRIMES THE H SA DID FOR ERRONEOUS ARREST AND/OR FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND TO DISCREDIT ME AND PREVENT THE TRUTH ON THE RECORD .

 THEREAFTER HSA EXTRACTING THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS FROM MY CHASE BANK ACCOUNTS BY TELEPHONIC IMPERSONATION IS IDENTITY THEFT FOLLOWED BY HSA COMMINGLING FUNDS BY HSA CONTRIVED DIRECT DEPOSIT OF FEDERAL FUNDS INTO MY BANK IN JULY 2011 WHERAS MY INFO WAS USED BY HSA AND HSA FALSE REPORTING EMERGENCIES BY HSA USING MY NAME IS THEREBY HSA AND ITS OWN MISREPRESENTATION OF FACTS BY HSA , DONE TO ENCOURAGE THE COUNTY OF VENTURA DISTRICT ATTORNEY INVOLVEMENT AND FILING FRIVOLOUS CRIMINAL CASES OF H S A OWN CREATION FUELED BY ULTERIOR INTEREST MOTIVATED BY SUSAN FELDMAN DRUG COURT MDT STATE AND FEDERAL FINANCIAL GAIN. AND AGAINST INNOCENT PARENTS FOR ASCERTING A RIGHT IS A CRIME IN ITSELF AND I RESPECTFULLY REQUEST A REHEARING OF THE UNNOTICED HEARING THAT PREJUDICED GARY ROSENTHAL, THE MALE PARENT THAT RAISED MY PREVIOUSELY THRIVING CHILDREN PROPERLY THE ISSUE IS AS I AM NOT IN DENIAL JUST A VICTIM OF DENIAL. DENIAL TO DUE PROCESS ON MULTIPLE UNDISCLOSED SECRET HEARING DATES AND THE RECENT 05-21-2012 WITHOUT NOTICE CHANGED TO MST RECENT 09-12-2012 HEARING WITHOUT PRIOR NOTICE TO FATHER FOR CASE J067944. THIS WAS DISCOVERED IN THE MINUTE ORDER I RECIEVED DATED MAILED 09-18-2012 . AND RECIEVED 1 WEEK AGO AFTER CLERK SENT TO WRONG ADDRESS AND POST OFFICE SENT TO ME BY FOREWARDING BECAUSE OF PREVIOUS TRICKERY BY HSA AND I ANTICIPATED THEIR GAMES AND DECEPTION EARLY ON AND I WENT TO THE POST OFFICE AND ASSURED MAIL FOREWARDING CARDS WHERE FILLED OUT AGAIN FOR ALL MY PREVIOUS  ADDRESSES TO MY PO BOX 19185 IN LOS ANGELES CA 90019.  I ALSO HAVE PROOF THAT THE AGENCY AND THE CLERK KNEW MY ADDRESS AND REFUSED TO SEND ME NOTICE ON PURPOSE AND I HAVE PROOF OF MY BI-WEEKLY REQUESTS AND JUVENILE CLERK RESPONSES STATING THAT SHE WOULD SEND ME THE REQUIRED NOTICE THAT I DID NOT RECIEVE AND PREVIOUS MINUTE ORDERS THAT I HAVE NOT RECIEVED ACCORDING TO MARY LOU AND HER SUPERVISOR AT CLERK OF SUPERIOR COURT OF CA. COUNTY OF VENTURA , 4353 VINEYARD IN OXNARD CA .   805 981 5977

 ALL REFERENCES cites the commission OF HSA AND CWDA AND ITS NEGLECT TO RESOLVE THIS MATTER IN EACH CHILDS BEST INTERESTS IS AND WAS MY PRIMARY CONCERN AND WE AS PARENTS NURTURED AND WELL RAISED OUR HAPPY LITTLE ONES AND ENSURED THAT EACH CHILD WAS STABLE AND EDUCATED AND HAPPY PARENTS TO SEE EACH CHILD THRIVE UNTIL SELFISH GREED FOR THE DOLLLAR AND PRIDE OF MSW

DORA SAENZ-BELDEN WAS ADAMITT THAT SHE WASNT IN

THE  WRONG

APT  103 INSTEAD OF

201 AND REMOVED OUR 4 PRECIOUS WELL RAISED HAPPY CHILDREN

09-15-2010

TODAY IS 09-27-2010

PLEASE BE FAIR AND DO WHATS RIGHT AND JUST

1.  The return of EACH VELASCO - ROSENTHAL CHILD to his or her parent would not create a risk of detriment to the safety, protection, or physical or emotional well-being of the child, and the child's placement in foster care is unnecessary and innapropriate.

1. THE ACTUAL factual basis for this conclusion is stated on the record WHEREAS ALL BUT MARSDEN HEARING OMMITTED AND DELETED OR ALTERED BY COURT AND ITS REPORTING ERRORS.

1. NOT INCLUDED IN TRANSCRIPTS IS UNFAIR PRACTICES AND PROCEDURAL MISCONDUCT THAT

 

1. BY FRAUD UPON THE COURT BY SHELLEY WATKINS FAILURE TO TRANSCRIBE THE WORDS OF SELECTED LITIGANTS AND JUDGE TARI L. CODY

1. JUDGE YELLS OUT LOUD THAT THE PARENTS ARE LIARS BUT WE HAD  NOT SPOKE YETAS JUDGE GOES OFF AND THEN DEMANDS OFF THE RECORD NUMEROUS OCCASIONS DURING CASE J067944 HEARINGS AND EX -PARTY HEARINGS AND COMMUNICATIONS WITHOUT NOTICE.

1. CUSTODY AND ORDERS CHILDREN PLACEMENT IN GUARDIANSHIP WITHOUT MERIT IS CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT  AND

2. Permanent plan MUST BE NOTICED !

1. FATHER WAS NOT AWARE AND I DID CALL AND THE COURT REFUSED AND THE JUDGE , AND LAWYERS PROCEEDED IN BAD FAITH TO REMOVE ALL 4 OF MY PRECIOUS CHILDREN.

  EACH VELASCO - ROSENTHAL CHILD OF 4 MISSING , FATHER GARY ROSENTHAL  AND NOTICES ARE MISSING FOR THE CUSTODY HEARING WHERE I AM WILLING AND ABLE TO PROPERLY PARENT MY CHILDREN AND OUR FAMILY PRAY FOR ME WHEREAS JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY FOR MY CHILDREN AND FAMILY AND OUR CIVIL RIGHTS AND 4TH 8TH 14TH AMENDMENTS OF THE US CONSTITUTION AND OF ITS ENORMOUS POWER TO GRANT BY ITS ENUMERATED POWERS

PRAYS FOR REHEARING AND/OR EXTENSION SO THAT I MAY BE NOTICED AND HEARD BY NOTICED HEARING AND INJUCTIVE RELIEF OR ANY OTHER REMEDIES IF AVAILABLE , SUCH AS  PETITION TO REVIEW AND /OR REHEAR CASE J067944 THRU J067947

,LEAVE OF COURT ,

 TOLL THE STATUTE, EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE STATEMENT ON APPEAL AND I AM ATTEMPTING TO SAVE MONEY AND NOT SPEND EXCESSIVE AMOUNTS OF THE COURTS MONEY SO I AM EAGER TO QUICKLY RESOLVE THIS DILEMA AND BY HOPING TO EXHAUST ALL STATE AND COUNTY REMEDIES PRIOR TO PROPCEEDING TO FEDERAL INTULUCATORY JURISDICTION OF THE SUPREME COURT THAT ASDVISED ME TO GO THIS ROUTE 1ST.

THE ATTORNEY

 RICH CUSH GIMAN

BAR #  64125

 FALSITIES TO MISLEAD GARY ROSENTHAL TO HIS DETRIMENT IN SEVERAL LETTERS TO INCORRECT COURT DATES PURPOSELY TO HAVE ME DRIVE OUT TO VENTURA 66 MILES AND 66 MILES BACK TO LA AFTER HE TELLS ME TO GO HOME AND GIVES ME CASH AND NO NEXT COURT DATE TILL AFTER COURT DATE IS OVER AND MINUTE ORDER TELLS OF THE HEARINGS THAT I WAITED TO RECIEVE NOTICE FOR BUT NOTICE RARELY WAS GIVEN AT ALL AND IMPROPERLY DIRECTING ME TO INCORRECT HEARING DATES AND INCORRECT TIMES AND EACH TIME I WAS ABLE TO ASCERTAIN THE DATE CORRECTLY IT WAS DELAYED OR CONTINUED TILL I MISSED NEXT HEARING BY NOT HAVING ANY NOTICE  EXCEPT FOR THE REVIEW HEARING FOR 6 AND 12 MONTH AND THE VISITATION TURNED MARSDEN HEARING WHERE MY ATTORNEY AND I HAD A COMPLETE BREAKDOWN IN COMMUNICATION SO OBVIOUS THAT I HAD NO IDEA WHERE THE CASE HAD GONE TILL I PETITTIONED FOR EXTRAORDINARY WRIT AND RECIEVED THE RECORD IN 2012 AND I WAS SHOCKED THAT THEY HELD SO MANY HEARINGS WITHOUT THE PARENT THAT WAS WILLING AND ABLE TO AND NOT AFFORDED AN OPPORTUNITY TO ATTEND.

AND 

SUSAN RATZKIN CA STATE BAR # 123480 PROCEEDED IN BAD FAITH BY EMAILING A REQUEST TO MEEET WITH ELIZABETH VELASCO AND LITTLE DID SHE KNOW IT WAS TO TRICK HER INTO COURT WITHOUT HER TELLING THE OTHER PARENT ON 09-12-2012 HEARING WHICH TOOK MY CHILDREN FROM ME WITHOUT NOTICE FOR THAT SPECIFIC DATE AND THIS WAS DONE FOR FINANCIAL REASONS AND TIME CONSTRAINTS CONTRARY TO THE CHILDS BEST INTERESTS

any information that SSA has furnished or disclosed about or prospective claimANT on FEDERAL DISABILITY AND

CA STATE BAR # 85144 ROBERT GARCIA WHO TOLD GARY TO STAY QUIET OR LOSE KIDS AND ACTUAL WORDS STATED WERE "GARY , DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT I HAVE MORE EXPERIANCE IN THIS COURT ROOM THEN YOU NOW SHUT THE f**k UP

80460 CA STATE BAR #OF CARLOS JESUS NEJERA is no longer involved after state bar complaints.

UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THE FORREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT

GARY ROSENTHAL 

--------------------------------                                   -----------------------------------

 

The Palermo Protocol defines human trafficking as:

 

[] the recruitment, transportation, transfer, harbouring or receipt of persons, by means of the threat or use of force or other forms of coercion, of abduction, of fraud, of deception, of the abuse of power or of a position of vulnerability or of the giving or receiving of payments or benefits to achieve the consent of a person having control over another person, for the purpose of exploitation. Exploitation shall include, at a minimum, the exploitation of the prostitution of others or other forms of sexual exploitation, forced labour or services, slavery or practices similar to slavery, servitude or the removal of organs.

 

This definition is structured around three major elements:

 

?  ACT: Human trafficking involves the recruitment, transportation, transfer, harboring and/or receipt of a person.

 

?  MEANS: It can be the threat or use of force, deception, abduction, the abuse of power or a position of vulnerability, or other forms of coercion.

 

?  PURPOSE: The purpose of human trafficking is exploitation, which can include the prostitution of others, forced labor, slavery or servitude.

 

While EHTN uses this definition as the basis of its work, we look at trafficking in a broader context acknowledging that trafficking can occur on a small scale without organized criminal involvement and that women, children and men can be trafficked within as well as between countries.

 

 


Anonymous

Parker,
Colorado,
USA
Scottsdale Gogettem

#12Author of original report

Wed, November 14, 2012

Who is driving the investigation of BBHE?  Is there going to be restitution for those who have suffered at their hands?  Who does one appeal to for redress or restoration?


Gogettem

Scottsdale,
Arizona,
United States of America
Debra Rinaudo

#13Consumer Comment

Wed, November 14, 2012

More information is going to be posted within 48 hours.  You are not alone.


Anonymous

Parker,
Colorado,
United States of America
Please tell me more - Scottsdale Gogettem

#14Author of original report

Wed, November 14, 2012

Please tell me more about the hearings of the BBHE at the Arizona capitol.  I just faxed another letter to Gov. Jan Brewer asking for this to be remedied since so many practitioners have been negatively impacted by Debra Rinaudo and the AZ Board of Behavioral Health Examiners.  I am asking her to restore what was lost - reinstating licenses and removing bad/false reports. Also, to make sure that practitioners do not have to continue living in fear while practicing. Prosecutorial misconduct has definitely taken place in these situations - refer to Dr. Martin H. Williams' (as member of the APA Ethics Committee) website referring to article 'Victims becoming Victimizers' - how Attorneys General are forcing pracitioners to sign consent agreements full of false allegations or lose their licenses.   I hope this information will be added to what is being looked at currently.

Please tell me what is going on at the capitol.  Thank you for letting me know that this is finally being discussed after all of this time.




Gogettem

Scottsdale,
Arizona,
United States of America
Status...

#15Consumer Comment

Tue, November 13, 2012

Please stand by.  Things are happening as of this morning's hearing's of BBHE at the capitol.... Time to start reviewing some of the past damage they have done.


Anonymous

Parker,
Colorado,
United States of America
This is in support of Gogettem in Scottsdale

#16Author of original report

Fri, November 09, 2012

I understand that Debra Rinaudo was investigated by a private investigator who found that she had ethics violations while practicing law.  My understanding was that she was told she could not practice law in AZ, but the 'deal' that was struck was that she could be a director for the mental health board!  So now she is accusing everyone else of ethics violations when there are none.

It is also my understanding that you cannot sue a board member or anyone who complains against you.  The scale is tipped, so practitioners cannot defend themselves.  AG's offices are stating that you either sign a consent agreement full of false allegations or you lose your license.  See Dr. Martin Williams' website with what is happening across the country.  

If a class action suit would work, please let me join in.  Thank you.


Gogettem

Scottsdale,
Arizona,
United States of America
Debra Rinaudo

#17Consumer Suggestion

Fri, November 09, 2012

I have learned of some information pertaining to some ethics violations that Debra Rinaudo may or may not have.  Does anyone know anything about what Debra Rinaudo's previous ethics violations were?  Was this while she was an attorney?  We have some licensed or previously licensed professionals that have expressed an interest in moving forward with a class action lawsuit pertaining to the actions and tactics of the BBHE.  Any info would be appreciated.  Thanks! 


Gogettem

Scottsdale,
Arizona,
United States of America
Debra Rinaudo

#18Consumer Suggestion

Fri, November 09, 2012

I have heard that Rinaudo has some ethics violations of her own, while an attorney.  Does anyone know anything about what Debra Rinaudo's previous ethics violations were?  Was this while she was an attorney?  An attorney in Arizona?  We have some licensed or previously licensed professionals that have expressed an interest in moving forward with a class action lawsuit pertaining to the actions and tactics of the BBHE.  Any info would be appreciated.  Thanks! 

Reports & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
Also a victim?
Repair Your Reputation!
//