Kevin
Houston,#2Consumer Suggestion
Sat, May 12, 2007
I would appeal your ruling to the appeals court.. If you did not have evidence of a payment schedule from the lender, under rules of discovery, you should be entitled to those.. If the defendant never turned those over to you, then make that case to the appeals court to overturn the lower court's decision.. Hope that helps.. But realize.. once you try a case in one court and is sided against you, you must appeal to the next level court.. Remember.. since the appeals court will not hear NEW evidence on its face, you can say that the judge erred in his/her ruling because the payment schedule was not provided under discovery.. They can remand or send the case back down to the lower court to re-examine..
Kevin
Houston,#3Consumer Suggestion
Sat, May 12, 2007
I would appeal your ruling to the appeals court.. If you did not have evidence of a payment schedule from the lender, under rules of discovery, you should be entitled to those.. If the defendant never turned those over to you, then make that case to the appeals court to overturn the lower court's decision.. Hope that helps.. But realize.. once you try a case in one court and is sided against you, you must appeal to the next level court.. Remember.. since the appeals court will not hear NEW evidence on its face, you can say that the judge erred in his/her ruling because the payment schedule was not provided under discovery.. They can remand or send the case back down to the lower court to re-examine..
Kevin
Houston,#4Consumer Suggestion
Sat, May 12, 2007
I would appeal your ruling to the appeals court.. If you did not have evidence of a payment schedule from the lender, under rules of discovery, you should be entitled to those.. If the defendant never turned those over to you, then make that case to the appeals court to overturn the lower court's decision.. Hope that helps.. But realize.. once you try a case in one court and is sided against you, you must appeal to the next level court.. Remember.. since the appeals court will not hear NEW evidence on its face, you can say that the judge erred in his/her ruling because the payment schedule was not provided under discovery.. They can remand or send the case back down to the lower court to re-examine..
Kevin
Houston,#5Consumer Suggestion
Sat, May 12, 2007
I would appeal your ruling to the appeals court.. If you did not have evidence of a payment schedule from the lender, under rules of discovery, you should be entitled to those.. If the defendant never turned those over to you, then make that case to the appeals court to overturn the lower court's decision.. Hope that helps.. But realize.. once you try a case in one court and is sided against you, you must appeal to the next level court.. Remember.. since the appeals court will not hear NEW evidence on its face, you can say that the judge erred in his/her ruling because the payment schedule was not provided under discovery.. They can remand or send the case back down to the lower court to re-examine..
Myron
Austell,#6Author of original report
Sat, May 12, 2007
This type of lending behavior is not normal, I have paid off two vehicles both having numerous late payments, very late, yet being able to pay both off on time. One of them being a high interest loan at 20% interest with a sub prime lender, paying $4,000 in interest 4x less then this rip-off Credit Union. This Credit Union has somthing to hide, this is why they have not responded to a single request of explanation. It is not normal to pay an additional $16,000 on a $24,000 loan at 9.9%. -Please think from a consumer standpoint.
Mike
Radford,#7Consumer Suggestion
Sat, May 12, 2007
The industry standard is the simple daily interest loan. When you're not paying off on schedule, you end up being charged more interest as well. Then you are charged more interest on that unpaid interest. This makes the additional amount owed considerably more than just the total of missed payments. There are online calculators that will "amortize" a loan and show how it is normal to pay more interest at the beginning, because you owe more money at the beginning. Your situation, because it has so many complex factors, is going to be difficult to compute for yourself but I think the numbers would end up the same as what the CU says. There's plenty of profit for them doing it by the book. They have no compelling reason to cheat. They should have tried to explain it to you better though.