Amber
Erie,#2Author of original report
Wed, January 28, 2004
Thank you for your response. I am aware of the issue you presented unfortunatly for the company (whether the money was there or not) it gave no notification that it was going to convert the check (electronically, also called check truncation) at it's location. Banks practice this & have slightly different (more less strict) restrictions but as the company's bank was not the one to send it electronically but the company itself it is required by law to provide notice either in the invoice/statement requesting payment or by posting a notice at the location. Neither of which was done by this company. I've called around & it looks like there's a pretty good case. The company may try to rebuttle as you have but that is a seperate issue. Thanks again.
Amber
Erie,#3Author of original report
Wed, January 28, 2004
Thank you for your response. I am aware of the issue you presented unfortunatly for the company (whether the money was there or not) it gave no notification that it was going to convert the check (electronically, also called check truncation) at it's location. Banks practice this & have slightly different (more less strict) restrictions but as the company's bank was not the one to send it electronically but the company itself it is required by law to provide notice either in the invoice/statement requesting payment or by posting a notice at the location. Neither of which was done by this company. I've called around & it looks like there's a pretty good case. The company may try to rebuttle as you have but that is a seperate issue. Thanks again.
Amber
Erie,#4Author of original report
Wed, January 28, 2004
Thank you for your response. I am aware of the issue you presented unfortunatly for the company (whether the money was there or not) it gave no notification that it was going to convert the check (electronically, also called check truncation) at it's location. Banks practice this & have slightly different (more less strict) restrictions but as the company's bank was not the one to send it electronically but the company itself it is required by law to provide notice either in the invoice/statement requesting payment or by posting a notice at the location. Neither of which was done by this company. I've called around & it looks like there's a pretty good case. The company may try to rebuttle as you have but that is a seperate issue. Thanks again.
Amber
Erie,#5Author of original report
Wed, January 28, 2004
Thank you for your response. I am aware of the issue you presented unfortunatly for the company (whether the money was there or not) it gave no notification that it was going to convert the check (electronically, also called check truncation) at it's location. Banks practice this & have slightly different (more less strict) restrictions but as the company's bank was not the one to send it electronically but the company itself it is required by law to provide notice either in the invoice/statement requesting payment or by posting a notice at the location. Neither of which was done by this company. I've called around & it looks like there's a pretty good case. The company may try to rebuttle as you have but that is a seperate issue. Thanks again.
Richard
Chalmette,#6Consumer Comment
Tue, January 27, 2004
...especially on New Year's Eve. Chances are that the company closed early and transmitted the conversions about noon or so, before the bank's bookeeping cutoff. An attorney will tell you that you are the one at fault for writing a check without sufficient funds to cover it. I once worked at a store which made a practice of cashing large checks immediately after the customer left. You need to assume that the check will be deposited immediateley. I learned that lesson the painful and expensive way.