Complaint Review: Autograph Magazine Live - Internet

Now, they have a “new” moderator who uses the name WASCHER.  Some might think that is an alias but it is actually short for Wendy Ascher.  She raises dogs in Appleton Wisconsin. 

Read another blog on ripoff reports on Julien’s Auction that came under attack by Steve Cyrkin where her name came out.  Interesting read how that site provides a forum for them to attack the owner of Juliens with very little substance and lots of unproven speculation so it seems that relied on some suspect authentication services.

So what did they do, make one a moderator of his autograph blog.  From there she can bias, harass, make statements about others, and opine on autographs and even the law.

Now where does a Dog Groomer from Appleton Wisconsin who raises dogs get all her insight?

According to her;

“Correct.  Steve and I are trying to implement ways of making the sight more user friendly. Allowing people to go off hammering each-other with personal insults instead of talking like adults, isn't a healthy atmosphere.  But it's also hard to control.... and neither of us can be right there on the threads at all times, nor do we know what someone is about to do... until after it happens.  So how to we stop this type of behavior?”

Yet, she condones nasty attacks from the followers as well as instigates it more often than not.  If someone throws it back, she delves into their information while harassing them to identify or deletes them yet many of the followers who do the same remain anonymous and verbally attack others who aren’t part of the circle.

“Moderator note:  Loren has been removed for offensive language.” Although Wendy Ascher allows offensive language about others who are regulars to the blog.

This part time moderator, so she says, “I don't get "dragged" anywhere--if I read a post and it feels sarcastic, I'll step in to watch how it plays out.”

But if you post a comment about her it gets deleted like this one’ “by Jadzzo MJ Wascher the moderator (she is a psycho that 24/7 dedicates her time to attack and discredit any person she feels is not going to be a client of her PERSONAL FRIEND.  Michael Jackson justice/ wendy ascher (she was banned and her poisonous comments removed)."

Checking the blog referenced it does appear Wendy can no longer post on it as all references seem to be blank.  Didn’t take to long for that comment to disappear.  In its place was now a comment from Wendy.  Another member must have seen it as that member asked for clarification.  No response from Wendy Ascher, aka Wascher.who also says, “I'm usually one of the biggest skeptics of people who show up to defend their items--follow my moderating - and you'll see that. “ except when she is asked to explain.

Does she really act as a moderator?  Doesn’t look like it.  Appears she is merely a part time lackey.  Does she have experience in anything related to autographs?  Wendy responded to one member that she maintained other blogs not related to autographs.

Maybe we should just ask this recording secretary Wendy Jo Vandynhoven but what would be the point!  “its a weekend, ya know what goes on on weekends?  Dog shows. “  But that’s right Wendy already noted her experience, “My hobby & love, is the sport of purebred dogs & dog showing in conformation.  I run several Dog Club/Dog Club members websites, as well as own/moderate several private dog lists for my breed, and have been doing this for about 12 yrs.” And “Also as a non-collector (but very interested in the hobby) - please know that my helping out is totally neutral and unbiased.   I believe he runs a very good site here, and in no way plan to do anything but help him keep it that way.”

Neutral.  Unbiased!  Wait a minute, I’m confused.  Is this non-collector moderator who often casts aspersions of others, opines on autographs while letting her followers use vile language, and act immature know anything about autographs since she is often involved in discussions about them really neutral?

If you follow Wendy it appears she really lied in all the above as she fancies herself as a world authority on Michael Jackson.  So why would she get tossed off of a Michael Jackson blog?    What might happen if someone simply created aspersion about her breeding dogs as nothing more than a puppy mill?  apps.akc.org/apps/club_search/index_master.cfm?action=refresh_index&active_tab_row_A=1&active_tab_col_A=1&fixed_tab=1&club_id=6136

Would that be fair?  Probably not, but the way she conducts herself and cast aspersions as if she is an expert is what that site seems to allow.  Or as her motto;” If you don’t like our sense of humor, tell  us so we can laugh at you”.  Maybe I’m not as confused as I thought or maybe Wendy is confused.as she looks;