BenRoyal
Fresno,#2Author of original report
Sat, August 06, 2011
However in a way it could be considered a "ripoff' in that Daystar claims to be a religious TV station and since they care not to have anyone read directly from the bible then it seems, to me, that the lack of interest in what is actually stated in the bible(s), especially the Greek history and the jewish history,(visualize these two areas of 'original documents') are where the current intrepertations of the many bibes usually are used to create biblical renditions.
Further, I suppose this need to nit-pick words is moot. So if it would make you more 'comfortable' use your own choice of words.
Might it be suggested that the use of "complaint", "notification of negative biblical policy", "lack of interest in biblical documentation", "desire by Daystar owner(s) to not have the bible read over their station(s)". There may be many other words you might be more comfortable with; these are just a few suggested formats for you to consider rather than the word "rip-off'.
Stacey
Dallas,#3Consumer Comment
Sat, August 06, 2011
Mr Lamb and see about all the trouble he is in!
jamesuss
United States of America#4General Comment
Fri, August 05, 2011
I am rather curious as to where the ripoff is. It sounds to me like your complaint is based on the fact that the owner of a large media conglomerate will not give you your own television show. Is that correct?
Also, the owner of a company like that is; quite frankly, too important and busy to speak to a general member of the public. More especially, a member of the public who is demanding their own television show that consists of some guy sitting there reading out of a book. Not exactly riveting television.