- Report: #1384365
Complaint Review: Federal Prison Alternatives - cleveland Ohio
-
Author Not Confirmed
Why?
Federal Prison Alternatives
5888 highland hills dr cleveland, Ohio, USA
Phone:
614 7870875
Web:
wwwRDAP.com
Categories:
Business Rating:
(0)
Tell us has your experience with this business or person been good?
FEDERAL PRISON ALTERNATIVES Patrick boyce RDAP Cheat liar and prior felon, Can't help with RDAP all lies cleveland Ohio
This guy will tell you what you want to hear.He can get your Federal Intmate off much eralier with his help and he lies about having Bureau of Prisons contacts to get ann inmate qucicker in the Drug program to get up to 12 months off. All lies and he uses a crooker partnet called paul davis ( if that is his real name). They push till they get your money and then never call you and lie about ,its gonna work, a mongth or two,then that passes and then just a while longer. Even his phony testimonies on hs site www.RDAP.com are phony, i called them and they had nothing good to say about this crook. He was an investment embezzalar in 2012 and seems ca't do anythging legal still.
There are man y like him that according to Bureau Of prisons in Washing to i spoke to said they are all scams. Already contacted the DA in Ohio and the IRS. I am not done yet .
1 Updates & Rebuttals
Patrick Boyce
Ohio,USA
Matter Resolved
#2REBUTTAL Owner of company
Wed, August 30, 2017
The challenge I have with this method of negative posting is that anyone can post whatever they want, whether it is based on facts or not. This post is full of inaccuracies but I am not going to address those here. The fact of the matter is that this client’s son was accepted to the RDAP.
The client was obviously not upset because of this fact but because he felt his son did not get into the program as quickly as he would have liked, which I explained is something that is not within our control.
Despite the fact that his son's admission timing will have absolutely no negative impact on his early release date, I realized that the client was unsatisfied so I decided that the right thing to do was to provide this client with a refund because he based his assumption on inaccurate information provided by a naive former employee, who I terminated upon learning of this.
This client received his refund check immediately and this matter is resolved; so I would appreciate it if this post were removed. I believe in always doing the right thing, I have done so for over a decade in this business and have many satisfied clients who will attest to this fact.
-Patrick
